ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 October 2012, 06:34 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
|
3 October 2012, 06:51 AM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: gary
Location: nyc
Watch: 1016 (1968)
Posts: 55
|
now, that is a really nice looking bracelet watch. the bracelet butts seamlessly to the case ends, as it should. the hong kong model appeared to have uneven edges, and the butt ends to the case had a soldered look. maybe it was just bad photography. my take on bad photography is, it hides defects, whether intentional or not. you be the judge. anyway, i hope the beauty of this watch is not just skin deep.
|
3 October 2012, 07:01 AM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: gary
Location: nyc
Watch: 1016 (1968)
Posts: 55
|
p.s. to my previous post
i previously posted comments on this watch, but one more thing. the star markers are an unfortunate detail on the dial. it gives the watch a carnival look that detracts from vintage charm of an inelegant handmade watch. mho.
|
3 October 2012, 02:39 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,000
|
Here's one for you Gary ...
Another one of those nasty star dials
|
3 October 2012, 11:15 PM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: gary
Location: nyc
Watch: 1016 (1968)
Posts: 55
|
what's missing from this dial? hmmm...weather report...soup of the day...appointments...
horoscope...blood pressure...emoticons...did i miss any? diamonds!!! preferably on the bezel. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.