ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 February 2017, 12:03 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,383
|
Something I'm appreciating more and more about Rolex
It's the comfort and fit, especially for a guy with skinny wrists like me (6.3 inches). I'm happy their "core" pieces have kind of stayed in that 36-40mm zone, and coupled with good bracelet design, I feel like basically every Rolex I've ever worn or tried on has been very comfortable.
I've kind of taken that for granted, expecting that from all watches, and I've been doing a lot of watch shopping lately and realized that's far from the case, even for watches around 40mm that I would "expect" to fit my wrist. |
13 February 2017, 12:05 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,649
|
They are the best IMPO plus add Glidelock Clasp WOW!
|
13 February 2017, 12:06 PM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,231
|
Quote:
|
|
13 February 2017, 12:11 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
|
I totally agree. I have a mid 1990s DayDate, early 2000s DateJust, a new GMT and they all fit perfectly. Not so much with a new Sub I tried on. It was disappointing as the AMEX card was ready for action.
|
13 February 2017, 12:14 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
|
It's funny you should say that. I wear a 16570, which is often considered one of the more comfortable professional models, yet it still feels a little heavy, and the back protrudes more than my first generation Omega Aqua Terra 2500. That thing is thin, light and feels like silk. I do still notice a big difference between my 16570 and my 16610, let alone the newer, heavier models.
|
13 February 2017, 12:20 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Edward
Location: USA
Posts: 857
|
I've been thinking about this lately, especially as I've been lusting after a Panerai Luminor. I struggle to imagine a better fit than my 214270.
|
13 February 2017, 02:11 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: the tide roll in..
Posts: 1,138
|
In my experience, most Rolex fit like a glove and wear like a dream
|
13 February 2017, 02:52 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,180
|
|
13 February 2017, 03:15 PM | #9 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,859
|
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, overall the finishing on dial and hands was whoa...above patek that cost 5x as much imho. But the cases seemed unusually thick. |
|
13 February 2017, 03:26 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
|
6.5 inch wrist here too and couldn't go any bigger.
Grand Seiko does have amazing fits indeed. Some of them like the anti-magnetic Milgauss equivalent are super thick. But some of the normal Hi beats are a good size.
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.