ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 February 2020, 12:54 AM | #121 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 237
|
Too bulky for me, but love the polar dial.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 February 2020, 12:56 AM | #122 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 111
|
I have one and I love it actually.
|
11 February 2020, 12:57 AM | #123 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Spain
Posts: 133
|
I prefer 16570 !!
|
11 February 2020, 01:03 AM | #124 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Middle East
Watch: Rolex / Tudor
Posts: 3,590
|
Agree with you on wrist size vs case size. I wish I can convince my eyes to accept the look of the 40mm case on my wrist buy so far I failed.
The SD43 came in the game and when I tried it on I immediately felt the need to have one. The Explorer 42 is a stunning watch and goes so well with different types of straps that pictures you shows prove the point. Also love the GMT function which I completely missed it there until so lately ! Quote:
__________________
Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible. |
|
15 February 2020, 04:55 AM | #125 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Culver City, CA
Watch: polar 16570
Posts: 9
|
I was debating between the 2 polar dial models, but I felt the 16570 looked a bit more tidy in terms of the dial, probably due to the GMT hand, and the 16570 was available in my birthyear. But I can appreciate both!
|
15 February 2020, 05:01 AM | #126 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: George
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 216570 Explorer II
Posts: 2,317
|
I've had white and now black. Absolutely a great watch. Size of dial helps legibility for my old eyes.
|
15 February 2020, 05:08 AM | #127 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Seattle
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 777
|
My favorite Rolex. Gets way more wrist time then my Hulk, Daytona or Batman. Just love the legibility and the touch of orange.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Daytona White 116500LN, GMT II BLNR, Explorer II Polar, Submariner 116610LV, GMT II BLRO, Sky Dweller Blue. |
15 February 2020, 05:46 AM | #128 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
I prefer 16570
|
15 February 2020, 06:01 AM | #129 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: arkansas
Posts: 3
|
I just had a call last week from my AD. I'm waiting on a 39mm Explorer and he got in a black dial Explorer 2 and called me to see if I wanted it instead of waiting for the 39mm. It's a great watch and I like everything about it. Its just to big for me so I decided to keep waiting for the 39mm. Been waiting a little over a month now.
|
15 February 2020, 06:21 AM | #130 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: .
Posts: 47
|
|
15 February 2020, 06:34 AM | #131 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Andrew
Location: USA
Watch: BLRO
Posts: 738
|
Love mine!
|
15 February 2020, 06:53 AM | #132 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Arrakis
Posts: 873
|
Not trying to trigger anyone but here is my honest opinion and an opinion only.
The watch is a great looking watch, I truly like it. I would buy one if I could try one on to be sure it would fit my wrist properly. On some larger average sized wrists it looks just fine but on many average sized wrists it looks too big (mainly the white dial). I see picture after picture on smaller wrists and it looks funny no matter how many times I see it, I just can't get used to it. If it doesn't bother the person wearing it, go for it. |
15 February 2020, 09:09 AM | #133 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Florida
Posts: 76
|
Watches are to be worn for the owner, no one else
|
15 February 2020, 11:36 AM | #134 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Ohio
Watch: Vintage DD'S
Posts: 829
|
|
15 February 2020, 12:10 PM | #135 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Tulsa, OK
Watch: Rolex SubC
Posts: 159
|
Just bought mine last week here on TRF. Love it! I have a 8” wrist and large hands and it is perfect. My Sub was just too small.
|
15 February 2020, 01:12 PM | #136 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 349
|
Totally love mine!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
15 February 2020, 03:39 PM | #137 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: london
Posts: 395
|
Exploring
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk |
15 February 2020, 04:48 PM | #138 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
Quote:
|
|
15 February 2020, 05:43 PM | #139 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: London
Posts: 978
|
It's not as universally appreciated as the other models and thats fine. Maybe the face, the case size, the hands? Who wants the same watch as everyone else anyway. Too big for me. So I chose something different
|
17 February 2020, 08:18 AM | #140 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Scotland
Watch: Rolex Hulk
Posts: 436
|
Picked mine up earlier this week from my AD. Great size for me and love the colour Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Enjoying: Daytona, Submariner Hulk, Bluesy, Seadweller, Explorer, White Milgauss, DJ41 fluted and mint green. Oyster Perpetual 41 green dial, Oyster Perpetual 39 grape dial, Tudor BB Harrods edition. |
3 September 2020, 12:08 AM | #141 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: New York City
Posts: 52
|
Is anybody else feeling tons of love for their 216570 in light on the new Sub? Turns out it's not too big after all, the maxi case actually looks better north of 40mm relieved of the squat, chunky lugs and crowded indices. I can't speak for everyone, but 39 years of an American diet has given my wrist enough real estate to accommodate 42mm, imo the steel sports Rolex you can buy at an AD has been the underground champ all along.
|
3 September 2020, 12:10 AM | #142 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Argentina
Posts: 762
|
It is not a watch for small wrists
|
3 September 2020, 01:23 AM | #143 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
|
Exp2 has always been a great watch imo both 5 and 6 digits. I prefer the 40mm Exp2, but both nice
|
3 September 2020, 02:23 AM | #144 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: atx
Posts: 84
|
love my black dial ex 2. even the grey market is starting to get stiffen up on them. used to sell below retail just a few months and now seem to be trending a few 100 over. also, fk the grey market.
|
3 September 2020, 02:26 AM | #145 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,608
|
Next year will see the ceramic bezel version for 50th .
Keep onto these ,vintage April next year. |
3 September 2020, 02:32 AM | #146 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 795
|
The problem with the Exp.II 42mm, is the lug to lug and bracelet end link to end link size.
Its current size puts it out of a comfortable wear for a lot of folks with less than 7” wrist. Anything smaller than a 7” wrist, and you’d have lugs and end links going past your wrist. It looks hideous on my wrist! Ie., the reason I still own a 40mm Exp.II. Love the watch, hate the fit. |
3 September 2020, 02:59 AM | #147 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: DFW
Posts: 193
|
I owned one. The proportions always seemed a bit off. I have larger wrists and liked the larger dial, but the visual seemed off to me. Good value, but I’m not a big fan of it. A 41mm version wi th better proportions could be beautiful.
|
3 September 2020, 03:07 AM | #148 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: london
Posts: 395
|
I love mine
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk |
3 September 2020, 03:23 AM | #149 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Louisiana, USA
Watch: 116710LN, 16800
Posts: 348
|
It’s a cool watch for sure but the GMT with a rotatable bezel just makes more sense to me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
3 September 2020, 03:30 AM | #150 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,159
|
My wrist at 7" I never thought it looked too big. Its very comfortable and sits low. Slim tapered lugs and smaller twinlock crown and guards keep it compact as possible for 42mm. Love the sheen of the finely brushed bezel as well as the taper from 21 to 17mm on its brushed bracelet. I have to say I even like it a little more than my Blnr.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.