ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RLXSTR · 29 February 2012, 05:21 AM

$89.95 and a free case. Okay, Deal.

bewithabob · 29 February 2012, 05:57 AM

that's a stinker.

z0mghenry · 29 February 2012, 01:35 PM

I think my G-Shock looks better and for less money

IIIJFRIII · 24 March 2012, 05:18 PM

I would not give 9 cents for that ugly piece of crap. If someone gave me 9k to wear the watch, along with the watch for free, I still wound not wear it. That thing is f-cking horrible looking.

Passionata · 24 March 2012, 05:53 PM

One of the ugliest watch ever seen

Adam K. · 24 March 2012, 09:00 PM

I just ralphed in my mouth a bit....

Reese's TimePieces · 9 April 2012, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSW

Where's a good facepalm when needed!

Right here:

One of the ugliest watches I have EVER seen in my life.

ebxchange · 10 May 2012, 05:44 PM

Looks good if it's only $500.

gutjam · 13 May 2012, 04:14 AM

Sorry, this is just obnoxious and ugly

BH13GMT · 13 May 2012, 04:19 AM

Perhap Rolex should start selling sunglasses!!!

I did check the dateto see if it was the 1st of april

romex · 21 June 2012, 04:59 AM

I just couldnt wear that..how on earth could they justify the price..

ocwatching · 21 June 2012, 08:36 AM

here you go...

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSW

Where's a good facepalm when needed!

Monte Cristo · 21 June 2012, 04:34 PM

if it was in rose gold and had a clear case back I would think about it...

Nah I'm just playin

How · 22 June 2012, 12:49 AM

Royal Oakley (please get this thing) Offshore...

Blue Owl · 22 June 2012, 02:47 AM

What a heck! I'll buy one.....

bewithabob · 22 June 2012, 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bewithabob

that's a stinker.

maybe I will feel better if I order one

Br290e · 24 June 2012, 04:28 AM

not nice at all. and waaay overpriced

cubangeek · 16 July 2012, 12:35 PM

Only thing that comes to mind is: WHY?

Rodentman · 16 July 2012, 11:28 PM

For that $ I'd be looking at something a little classier, like a JLC...

iDuc · 17 July 2012, 12:05 AM

But they do make some sweet Watch cases, of watch vaults :)

2th Dr · 17 July 2012, 06:18 AM

The Oakley website says it's COSC, but then further down it says accuracy of +/- 12 seconds a day. Did COSC standards change???

threemonkeys · 17 July 2012, 10:45 AM

Older post. But it's nice to see that ugly is still ugly.

I'm guessing they modeled this fine specimen after someone's stylish can opener.

Just saying.

AmbSteve · 19 July 2012, 02:26 PM

Ugh, and with the valjoux movement you know they just slapped it in the case and put the brand name on it. Who's gonna pay that much for something that they basically just pieced together from other sources?

watchking123 · 3 August 2012, 07:34 AM

way way overrated!!!

HOHO · 25 August 2012, 05:06 AM

Come on ,
That CAN'T cost $9K

ryanluo23 · 29 August 2012, 08:58 PM

makes me wonder who will buy it

Rashid.bk · 31 August 2012, 05:23 PM

honestly, not even free. worse case, I'd take it, sell it, add another $10 and a coupon from sundays paper....should have enough for a ten pound bag of cat food.

Puffy · 31 August 2012, 06:30 PM

horrible looking thing

fail

handsfull · 1 September 2012, 01:08 PM

Ish.

Ticking Away · 1 September 2012, 01:32 PM

Wait 6 months and Invicta will copy it for $199 with value pays. In 8 months you could but it on DOD sites for $49.

29 February 2012, 05:21 AM	#61
RLXSTR "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Donald Location: Texas Watch: Sub5513 / Choc1675 Posts: 826	$89.95 and a free case. Okay, Deal. __________________ '66 5513 Meters First \| '77 1675 Chocolate \| '85 DateJust 2-Tone \| Omega Planet Ocean Chrono XL Orange \| 1978 Omega Speedmaster 1st Walk on the Moon

29 February 2012, 05:57 AM	#62
bewithabob "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Bob Location: Dallas, Texas Watch: Daytona Meteorite Posts: 3,413	that's a stinker. __________________ meteor flying to Earth onto my wrist... 116509 Daytona Meteorite, 116520 Daytona Black, 116710 GMTIIC, 16013 DATEJUST, CARTIER SANTOS 100 W20090X8, IWC Big Pilot, IWC Top Gun "Everything works out in the end. If it hasn't worked out, it's not the end."

24 March 2012, 05:53 PM	#65
Passionata "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: N/A Watch: the girls Posts: 7,095	One of the ugliest watch ever seen __________________ Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- newhttps://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE new http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1

13 May 2012, 04:19 AM	#70
BH13GMT "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Paul Location: UK, Dorset Watch: and learn Posts: 2,631	Perhap Rolex should start selling sunglasses!!! I did check the dateto see if it was the 1st of april __________________ Rolex Sub 1680, Rolex GMT 116710LN, Rolex Datejust 16220 Salmon Dial (the Mrs), Tudor BB58, Tudor Pelagos Blue and Several Seiko's ************************************************ *************** "last one in the chopper is a rotten egg" Jonathan Quayle Higgins III

21 June 2012, 04:34 PM	#73
Monte Cristo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Sydney Watch: ing you... Posts: 3,775	if it was in rose gold and had a clear case back I would think about it... Nah I'm just playin __________________ 'I am easily satisfied with the very best' - Winston Churchill

29 February 2012, 01:35 PM	#63
z0mghenry "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Henry Location: GA Posts: 617	I think my G-Shock looks better and for less money

24 March 2012, 05:18 PM	#64
IIIJFRIII Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Long Island N.Y. Posts: 55	I would not give 9 cents for that ugly piece of crap. If someone gave me 9k to wear the watch, along with the watch for free, I still wound not wear it. That thing is f-cking horrible looking.

24 March 2012, 09:00 PM	#66
Adam K. Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: WA Watch: All the Oysters Posts: 811	I just ralphed in my mouth a bit....

10 May 2012, 05:44 PM	#68
ebxchange 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: OC, CA Posts: 5,672	Looks good if it's only $500.

13 May 2012, 04:14 AM	#69
gutjam Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: James Location: New York Watch: 14060M Posts: 29	Sorry, this is just obnoxious and ugly

21 June 2012, 04:59 AM	#71
romex Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: uk Posts: 33	I just couldnt wear that..how on earth could they justify the price..

22 June 2012, 12:49 AM	#74
How "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Melbourne Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960 Posts: 1,554	Royal Oakley (please get this thing) Offshore...

22 June 2012, 02:47 AM	#75
Blue Owl "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: Leo Location: Planet Earth Watch: 16610LV 116610LV Posts: 989	What a heck! I'll buy one.....

24 June 2012, 04:28 AM	#77
Br290e "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Hawaii Posts: 2	not nice at all. and waaay overpriced

16 July 2012, 12:35 PM	#78
cubangeek "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: South Florida Watch: 16520/14060/116200 Posts: 32	Only thing that comes to mind is: WHY?

16 July 2012, 11:28 PM	#79
Rodentman Banned Join Date: Aug 2005 Real Name: ACCT CLOSED Location: - Posts: 1,497	For that $ I'd be looking at something a little classier, like a JLC...

17 July 2012, 12:05 AM	#80
iDuc "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Netherlands Watch: Rolex 14060M Posts: 37	But they do make some sweet Watch cases, of watch vaults :)

17 July 2012, 06:18 AM	#81
2th Dr Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Mark-O! Location: Arlington, TX Watch: Rolex Posts: 12,714	The Oakley website says it's COSC, but then further down it says accuracy of +/- 12 seconds a day. Did COSC standards change???

17 July 2012, 10:45 AM	#82
threemonkeys "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Real Name: Craig Location: Seattle-ish, USA Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc Posts: 7,022	Older post. But it's nice to see that ugly is still ugly. I'm guessing they modeled this fine specimen after someone's stylish can opener. Just saying.

19 July 2012, 02:26 PM	#83
AmbSteve "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: San Angelo, TX Watch: Rlx,Omega,JLC,Breg Posts: 1,699	Ugh, and with the valjoux movement you know they just slapped it in the case and put the brand name on it. Who's gonna pay that much for something that they basically just pieced together from other sources?

3 August 2012, 07:34 AM	#84
watchking123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: ontario Posts: 87	way way overrated!!!

25 August 2012, 05:06 AM	#85
HOHO "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: Toronto Watch: Deep Blue Posts: 260	Come on , That CAN'T cost $9K

29 August 2012, 08:58 PM	#86
ryanluo23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: melbourne Posts: 30	makes me wonder who will buy it

31 August 2012, 05:23 PM	#87
Rashid.bk "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Dallas Watch: 12800ft = 3900m Posts: 11,172	honestly, not even free. worse case, I'd take it, sell it, add another $10 and a coupon from sundays paper....should have enough for a ten pound bag of cat food.

31 August 2012, 06:30 PM	#88
Puffy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 12,485	horrible looking thing fail __________________ Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten

1 September 2012, 01:08 PM	#89
handsfull "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: J Location: The great Midwest Watch: youlookinat? Posts: 2,369	Ish.

1 September 2012, 01:32 PM	#90
Ticking Away "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Nor Cal Posts: 272	Wait 6 months and Invicta will copy it for $199 with value pays. In 8 months you could but it on DOD sites for $49.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode