***leaked photos & specification (Nautilus 6711)***

[SL BRABUS]

6711/1T-001

Watch:
Self-winding mechanical movement. Caliber 324 S. Sweep seconds hand.

Dial:
Blue sunburst, gold applied hour markers with luminescent coating.


Case:
Titanium. Sapphire-crystal case back. Water resistant to 120 m. Case diameter: 41 mm. Height: 8.1 mm.

Strap:
Titanium bracelet. Fold-over clasp with micro adjustment of 2mm gain on each side of the clasp.



6711/1P-001

Watch:
Self-winding mechanical movement. Caliber 324 S. Sweep seconds hand.

Dial:
Dial: black gradated, gold applied hour markers with luminescent coating.


Case:
Platinum. Sapphire-crystal case back. Water resistant to 120 m. Case diameter: 41 mm. Height: 8.1 mm.

Strap:
Platinum bracelet. Fold-over clasp with micro adjustment of 2mm gain on each side of the clasp.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interested rumors...^^^..

If this were to be true....

Love the clean looking dial with the sunburst blue... Plus titanium case & bracelet for light weight.... And finally micro adjustment clasp...

I'm sure 41mm will fit everyone, just fine...... No different than the 40mm.....

As for the platinum.... It a heavy hitters in my book....

[martinr]

No date?

[enjoythemusic]

Originally Posted by martinr

No date?

Please be patient, as Patek has been busy with their brilliant new concept of crafting new date windows wheels. Soon PP will match all date background wheels to the main dial like many other manufacturers have offered for many decades. Patek simply has not fully tooled up their new equipment yet to make this a reality. Seiko, Paneri, and others have decades of experience here, so be kind as this matching of date wheel to the main dial, even on entry-level pieces, is something very new and innovative for PP (on their entry-level pieces). It'll happen, just please be patient as the wait will be worth it.

[cascavel]

Originally Posted by enjoythemusic

Please be patient, as Patek has been busy with their brilliant new concept of crafting new date windows wheels. Soon PP will match all date background wheels to the main dial like many other manufacturers have offered for many decades. Patek simply has not fully tooled up their new equipment yet to make this a reality. Seiko, Paneri, and others have decades of experience here, so be kind as this matching of date wheel to the main dial, even on entry-level pieces, is something very new and innovative for PP (on their entry-level pieces). It'll happen, just please be patient as the wait will be worth it.

Actually, they do it superbly, as long as the dial of the watch is white. And I don't mean off white or cream or cafe au lait.

[enjoythemusic]

Originally Posted by cascavel

Actually, they do it superbly, as long as the dial of the watch is white. And I don't mean off white or cream or cafe au lait.

Your post almost makes PP sound a bit, dare we say this, Racis... (eh hem) white preferred. Yes, when it comes to date/month/etc inner dials on entry-level Pateks it appears they are indeed very much 'color'-preferred for whites with no regard to dial color or design. Good point Cascavel and many thanks for pointing this out.

Of course, and let's be fair here, PP makes sub-dials with black background so they do offer it on a few products they sell.

[soundserious]

Beauty. That titanium is a grail amongst grails. Wow!

[illiguy]

Wow. The no date would be interesting. I like it.

[Token74]

Amazing, apart from the size.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mockingboy]

Renderings look cooler than the actual watches will

[2nastie]

No date is interesting...

What did I say haha, going PM route for PP... (and titanium). Smart move!

But did we forget... we won't be able to buy this at MSRP anyways!

[sokoloka]

No date makes me interested in a nautilus for the first time ever.

[JerBear]

Wow, definitely interesting. Surprisingly no date (I prefer the date TBH). Any word of MSRP?

[Valedictorian]

Movement downgrade from the new Cal. 26‑330 SC back to the non-hack 324 S seems unlikely.

[djona]

Originally Posted by Valedictorian

Movement downgrade from the new Cal. 26‑330 SC back to the non-hack 324 S seems unlikely.

This. Love the no date though.

[dannyp]

Originally Posted by Valedictorian

Movement downgrade from the new Cal. 26‑330 SC back to the non-hack 324 S seems unlikely.

That seems logical and intuitive, and typically I'd guess that's correct. Except... The lack of a date. While I prefer hacking+date over any other combo, for a non-hacking piece I think dateless is probably preferable in terms of convenience, especially if it isn't a daily wearer.

As far as the logic behind the whole switch, I do have one guess: power reserve. The 324 lists minimum of 45 hours, the 330 only 35. As PR grow across the board (I think Rolex is now up to 70!!) there's a need to compete there, too.

So, when all was said and done, the 324 w/o date makes sense, I think.

[jeffyy]

Originally Posted by Valedictorian

Movement downgrade from the new Cal. 26‑330 SC back to the non-hack 324 S seems unlikely.

this

[pav333hp]

My thoughts...

1. These are just rumors and speculations and nothing official, so I'm not holding my breath just yet.

2. I don't like the feel of titanium on a watch. It feels too light, plasticy and cheap. But I'm also one of those individuals that associate weight with quality.

3. Platinum would be incredibly awesome, but I worry that it will have eye watering price. Last platinum 5711 Nautilus was their 40th anniversary, which imho was absolutely stunning, but also six figure price ($113k). But it's Patek and they aren't afraid to release expensive watches to keep the brand name (latest release was $1M+).

At this point, I suppose we wait and see. I just hope it will be something awesome and reasonably priced. I also hope that the 5711 doesn't suffer the same fate as the steel 5980 (arguably the most beautiful steel Nautilus released to date) that got discontinued and never replaced. I actually hope they still have another steel 5711 replacement - improved, but not discontinued.

[illiguy]

Are the leaks from a somewhat reputable leaker (if that’s even a thing)? Really surprised if the next gen Nautlius had no date. Seems a departure from legacy ...

[Aquinas]

Shame if true - I would have loved to see PP try to sell their complications for a few years without being able to dangle the Nautilus in front of customers.

[uscmatt99]

I love the no-date look and choice of metals. Someone who already owns 10 complicated Patek pieces is really going to love begging their AD for these as well.

[w220]

If true, very nice indeed.

[fsprow]

No date, no sale here.

[fortrtwo]

It is believed that these photos was strongly synthesized from the existing 5711 image.

As a proof of that, what is reflected on the glass at the 3 o'clock index is not the index, but the date window.

haha...

[dannyp]

Originally Posted by fortrtwo

It is believed that these photos was strongly synthesized from the existing 5711 image.

As a proof of that, what is reflected on the glass at the 3 o'clock index is not the index, but the date window.

haha...

Yup! Zoom in, and compare the image to what's on Patek's site: you can even see the reflection of the "8" along the inner rim of the bezel (the date is on "18" on the Patek site).

Now, I still maintain that if there is to be a new Nautilus and no new movement, the 324/no-date combo makes some sense, for the reasons articulated above. However, I'm less convinced that this rumor is grounded in reality.

[RussW]

Titanium seems very unlikely as a normal production watch.

[Bruce_Wayne]

What’s the lug width? That may be a deal breaker for me...lol


Sent from the Waitlist at 6 different ADs

[Tomas Eriksson]

In my opinion it becomes “to symmetrical” without the date window. it needs a date window for the design not to be boring.

[SpaceDweller77]

I am very interested in the Platinum version...

[V25V]

If they do no date, that would be a mistake in my opinion.

[daOnlyBG]

Originally Posted by V25V

If they do no date, that would be a mistake in my opinion.

Agreed.