ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
22 April 2017, 07:26 AM | #91 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Wow another blast from the past thread...
|
28 April 2017, 06:56 AM | #92 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
Quote:
So true in fact I've ordered a SS 5711 today. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
28 April 2017, 05:26 PM | #93 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
|
28 April 2017, 05:38 PM | #94 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
Thanks Lapince, it's really grown on me since I noticed a very good client of mine wearing one, when I commented on it he handed it to me and when I felt the weight and he just casually told me that it was a 5711p. That was a year ago and since then its really caught my attention.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 April 2017, 07:36 PM | #95 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Quote:
|
|
21 June 2017, 11:06 PM | #96 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: here
Watch: 214270 Mk1
Posts: 916
|
Great post! Thanks a lot
__________________
here to learn |
21 June 2017, 11:32 PM | #97 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
This is a great thread. I am toying of buying either a 5711 or 15202. I have 6" wrists. Here is a wrist shot. Thoughts?
|
21 June 2017, 11:37 PM | #98 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,831
|
|
22 June 2017, 12:25 AM | #99 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
|
22 November 2017, 01:42 AM | #100 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: shopping
Posts: 1,461
|
Quote:
My vote goes to the 15202. I would love to "trade up" one day from my 15300!
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
|
22 November 2017, 02:53 AM | #101 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 3,200
|
I've owned both.
15202>5711. |
22 November 2017, 05:50 AM | #102 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
Quote:
.......that moment when you realise that you’re talking total bollocks. |
|
22 November 2017, 06:13 AM | #103 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,058
|
RO was designed as a fashion forward watch, that was it's raison d'être. It was built to be groovy, for the young wealthy elite, man of the world and so on... and the fact that it is still considered to be, at least by some, 45 years later is fairly extraordinary.
|
15 September 2021, 06:01 PM | #104 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Texas
Posts: 14
|
Thanks for sharing. I can't argue with any of your points.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.