|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 September 2017, 02:59 AM
|
#61 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: ma
Posts: 27
|
Sub no date
|
|
|
|
16 September 2017, 03:25 AM
|
#62 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Ken
Location: Europa
Watch: 216570
Posts: 693
|
Well red r, rather than hearing us squawking, what are your current thoughts?
__________________
"My center is yielding, my right is retreating. Excellent situation, I am attacking" Ferdinand Foch |
|
|
|
|
16 September 2017, 03:12 PM
|
#63 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 30
|
Can't go wrong with a sub!
|
|
|
|
|
16 September 2017, 03:38 PM
|
#64 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,254
|
What did the OP go for?
|
|
|
|
|
16 September 2017, 03:41 PM
|
#65 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Close to Rolex AD
Posts: 3,474
|
Submariner 114060
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
20 September 2017, 04:18 AM
|
#66 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 1,262
|
Explorer every time.
|
|
|
|
|
23 September 2017, 10:38 PM
|
#67 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 449
|
Tough choice... I'd go with the Explorer. IMO suits perfectly every occasion, from casual to dressy.
Best regards, Mr. Gonzalez |
|
|
|
|
24 September 2017, 01:09 AM
|
#68 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: London
Watch: 116610LN & 214270
Posts: 490
|
The Explorer 39mm is the more versatile watch to wear compared with the Sub. I have both and that's my opinion from experience.
Regarding a Sub date vs no date. I can recall a an AD saying to me that in his opinion a Rolex is not a Rolex unless it has a cyclops! For sure a cyclops does make the watch obvious that it is a Rolex, to all and sundry! |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
