ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 May 2020, 02:21 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 27
|
Seamaster 300m Ceramic
Hi,
I have a current model 40mm Railmaster and am thinking of getting the 43.5mm Ceramic Seamaster. I have 6.5 inch wrists and am thinking it might be too large? Anyone got one with skinnier wrists and have you any pics? What do you think of this piece in general? Thanks! Sent from my ANE-LX1 using Tapatalk |
24 May 2020, 03:25 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 12,903
|
I can't speak to how it wears but it's a beautiful watch. I especially like it on the OEM rubber strap. Black, white, blue can't go wrong. It's a bargain at that price point too, especially secondhand
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk |
24 May 2020, 03:48 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Doug
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Daytona BLNR SubLV
Posts: 2,249
|
Quote:
The SMP Diver 300 ceramic is 42mm. There is a 43.5mm PO. The SMP is not as tall and would wear smaller than PO. Do you want the SMP or Planet ocean? Here is a video of my white SMP on a 7.25” wrist. https://youtu.be/nWfddteRR7I Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
24 May 2020, 04:34 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,435
|
OP, I'm thinking it will be a little too large for you but I guess it depends on your wrist...if its flat or round. I have a 7 1/4 wrist and it looked to big on mine.
|
24 May 2020, 05:04 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 27
|
Sorry, i meant the ceramic and titanium cased seamaster, which is a bit bigger.
Sent from my ANE-LX1 using Tapatalk |
24 May 2020, 05:17 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Doug
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Daytona BLNR SubLV
Posts: 2,249
|
Quote:
Oh, the no date! Sweet watch! My AD salesperson wears one with a sub 7” wrist. Looks nice and wears smaller because of rubber strap. If it were bracelet it would wear larger. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
24 May 2020, 05:18 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 27
|
Yeah, it looks really stealth and a lot more expensive than it is IMO
Sent from my ANE-LX1 using Tapatalk |
26 May 2020, 02:01 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 16
|
300m black ceramic is my favorite omega piece at the moment. It’s next on my list!
|
26 May 2020, 03:09 AM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Randy
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,917
|
I believe the OP is referring to this Seamaster Diver 300, which is 43.5 mm.
https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/w...21092442001001 |
27 May 2020, 04:59 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,132
|
I have the 42mm seamaster 300m (newest model wave dial with 6'oclock date) in blue and it fits nicely on my 6.5 inch wrist. I would consider this the "maximum largest watch" that would make sense on my dimension of wrist, but thanks to the lug design and short lug-to-lug length it actually wears nicely even in the 6.5 inch wrist range.
Only thing I did not like was the metal bracelet which is too heavy and has rough/sharp edges. Swapped out for rubber strap and result is perfect summer watch :) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.