What would you rather own?

[2bigalow]

Are we talking gray prices or AD prices?

[douglasf13]

Originally Posted by KeithP

Rolex. A 36 OP with a black dial, let’s say, or a 34 Date… timeless classic… either a forever heirloom piece. Most expensive Tudor will be cool for a while.

If we’re not talking about price and being able to sell it, I’d probably pick the black 36mm OP over every other current Rolex, let alone Tudor.

[AF_Rob]

I love the OP and the BB 58 over any other Tudor. So, I guess cheapest Rolex.

[KeithP]

Originally Posted by douglasf13

If we’re not talking about price and being able to sell it, I’d probably pick the black 36mm OP over every other current Rolex, let alone Tudor.

[garyk]

Originally Posted by Chewbacca

I’m not really sure?

Maybe a base OP and S&G Chrono perhaps?

My wife has the S&G Chrono on Bund and I must say, it’s a pretty cool watch…don’t know if I would trade any of my Rolexes for it.

[garyk]

Originally Posted by kieselguhr

We’re talking current production right?

If the most expensive Tudor came with a brushed gold bracelet with T-fit, I would buy it over the cheapest Rolex for sure, maybe even over the most expensive Rolex.



Come to think of it, I would buy and wear the cheapest Tudor over the cheapest Rolex as well.

This one looks amazing!

[GB-man]

Neither for me.

[dba]

Originally Posted by turkeysub93

Rolex everyday of the week and twice on Sunday

This exactly. Never a Tudor.

[shaunylw]

Cheapest Rolex i would wear would be an OP, no thank you. Extremely basic and boring. Would rather spend $3500 and wear a bb58.

If you like the OP, that’s awesome. I wouldn’t look at what is the absolute least expensive Rolex i can buy. Nobody will notice it, nobody cares. I would rather buy whatever i like for whatever it costs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[csaltphoto]

In short? Cheapest Rolex.

Might need my flame suit for this opinion... But in the AD's I've been in, current Tudors just don't compare well to Rolex. It might be that the Tudors are typically displayed less advantageously than the Rolexes and might fare better in a Tudor boutique. Or it might be that the differences in design/finishing are much more apparent in person. I don't know what it is honestly. I think Tudors photograph extremely well but just don't blow my hair back in person. I know they are both a very good watch and good value.

I do like the older Tudors where they used a lot of Rolex parts and ETA movements. But not really interested in vintage.

[norcalctr]

That’s an awesome easy one, the Rolex.

[noshame]

Least expensive Rolex because the OP36 Silver just happens to be one of my favourite pieces!

[Slimpee]

Originally Posted by kieselguhr

I was about to say that I would take a OP 41 over the most expensive Tudor but then I saw this photo.

I change my vote to the gold BB over an OP.

If the gold BB isn't an option, I would go with an OP 41.

[omar-rye]

I googled “the most expensive Tudor sold” and I got this Submariner big crown




I would definitely take this over the cheapest Rolex (if paying for it wasn’t in the equation)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SS Oyster]

Rolex


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[espanol]

Some people care about the Rolex cache. To me, it means nothing. In fact, I find the new wave of Rolex enthusiasts to be rather obnoxious. Not gatekeeping, but the whole Youtube watch scene, and instagram hype buyers are not my speed.

I'd buy any Tudor or Rolex that I enjoy, regardless of price. Both are great brands.

[AEV]

Rolex for me.

[Krash]

I just don’t like that gold BB58 with green dial.

Sorry, but it’s just not me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[OYptL]

Rolex OP any day. Something about those 904L bracelets and cases.