ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 January 2020, 09:43 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Earth
Posts: 180
|
3135 real trooper
Kinda a cool to think my 1989 date just and my 2019 sub both have the 3135 movement. Both +/- 1 sec a week.
Pretty amazing to think a 30 year old movement is keeping time as good as a new one. Like I said...3135 is a real trooper. |
8 January 2020, 09:48 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Midwest
Watch: BLNR, SD43, OP31
Posts: 424
|
Quote:
#dontscrewwithsuccess |
|
8 January 2020, 09:49 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ryan
Location: DMV
Watch: LVc
Posts: 2,050
|
|
8 January 2020, 09:56 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
|
Pretty awesome...tried and true.
|
8 January 2020, 10:25 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Nik
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,166
|
Real workhorse
|
8 January 2020, 10:32 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,183
|
I agree it's a great movement.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
8 January 2020, 10:56 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southeast
Watch: Divers, GMT
Posts: 2,144
|
Agree
|
8 January 2020, 11:30 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
You're right, but I expect nothing less from the 32xx series. Just give it some time to prove itself.
|
8 January 2020, 12:14 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Watch: Rolex, Omega
Posts: 256
|
If there’s a new model I might add a no date but I love my last year 3135 in this model sub.
Newer isn’t necessarily better. But I have an open mind, as said above time will tell. This is an article I came across comparing the 3135 to 3235 by a watchmaker. Pretty interesting read. https://quillandpad.com/2019/11/19/w...ich-is-better/ |
8 January 2020, 12:26 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,455
|
Quote:
Ashton happens to be a TRF member and regularly contributes to the forum |
|
8 January 2020, 12:31 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 276
|
Agreed. The 3135 is an outstanding, proven movement. It's power reserve has been sufficient for a very long time.
|
8 January 2020, 11:07 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,360
|
And with routine maintenance it will still be powering Rolex watches for ad infinitum.
It really is a mechanical marvel that these things are machined and fitted to such precise tolerances that they work very so efficiently, but most of all just flat out keep going. A friend of mine has his grandfathers Day Date from 1974, its runs just fine and it’s only been serviced twice! |
8 January 2020, 11:14 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Eastwest
Posts: 1,322
|
That it is....
|
9 January 2020, 12:47 AM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 3,688
|
I think the anticipation around the new movement is around a 70 hour PR. IMHO 40 hours is pretty low For modern watches costing ~$10k. Many will say it doesn’t matter, but I’ve found the difference is setting your watch Monday morning after not wearing it over the weekend vs it still running.
__________________
Current watches: 116718ln, 116500 black dial, 40mm Breitling Chronomat MOP dial “A man with one watch always knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.” |
9 January 2020, 03:18 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Alan
Location: Northern, CA
Watch: 116334
Posts: 2,215
|
I agree, I would be happy to have a watch with 3135 movement, it's time proven and probably easy to service when needed. The 70 hour reserve time on the newer movements is impressive. I do own a watch with 3255 movement and it incorporates all the latest improvements. But I am also okay with winding my speedy pro.
__________________
Rolex 116334 126600 228235 |
9 January 2020, 03:37 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Ian
Location: Hamburg
Watch: Sub 14060
Posts: 1,120
|
And so is the caliber 3000 in my 1996 Sub 14060! It keeps excellent time (just serviced at my RSC last summer). They're both solid, tough workhorses, and I certainly haven't babied mine! It will probably outlast me...
|
9 January 2020, 04:18 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Ozone
Watch: DD, DJ, SubC Date
Posts: 1,666
|
The 3135 is my preferred movement at the moment. There have been lubrication issues with the initial run of the 3235, which has resulted in the need for warranty work on new watches. No such issue with the 3135. Also, a big shout out to the 3055 movement which powers my 1986 DD ... still going strong within COSC specs.
__________________
"Never complain about the air-conditioning on a private jet." - Michael Nesmith |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.