ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
14 April 2024, 02:50 AM | #1 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Sudbury, MA USA
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
I bought this new at an AD in the UK in 1997 with the 93150 Oyster fliplock bracelet. Given your experience would you have any idea: 1. Why WSR says that my watch should have a jubilee bracelet when I bought it new from an AD with the 93150 on it? 2. Why the RSC serviced it in 2016 without requiring purchase of a jubilee bracelet? Do you think that owing to some change in rules and procedures Rolex AD/ASC and RSC will no longer service my watch without requiring the purchase of a jubilee bracelet? That would be crazy! The watch is original as-purchased except for the insert & crystal replacement by RSC in 2016! |
|
14 April 2024, 03:11 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 125
|
Quote:
Here is an alternative idea: WSR is wrong. I have seen it wrong before, specifically a serial number coming up with the incorrect model number. That leads me to believe that other errors exist within the database. What I hope to see happen for you is this - Rolex changes the bracelet style in WSR to your 93150. It's not a viable choice on the dropdown menu for me, but I have seen it listed as the correct bracelet for a GMT before. I suspect that Rolex will support the 93150 bracelet on a GMT, but will not allow for the addition of it. |
|
14 April 2024, 03:18 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Sudbury, MA USA
Posts: 30
|
Thank you again for your insight! I'll update the thread when I hear back from the RSC via the AD.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.