The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 December 2018, 06:36 AM   #1
ErikLdn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
Which AP to add?

Hi

I am considering getting a Royal Oak next but am undecided as to which reference to add as whilst I like the 15202 it wears quite large (almost borderline for my 6.75 wrist) and the size combined with the many reflecting surfaces makes it almost feel a bit flashy to me and hence I am also considering a 14790 as it’s an elegant watch in that size but downside of that is that I prefer to buy something new and 14790 feels just a tiny bit small and obviously it’s not the size of the original (I don’t like the 15450 due to its thickness).

For reference, current collection consists of PP 5167, Vacheron 47101 in yellow gold, Rolex GMT II and a speedmaster (vacheron and PP gets almost all the wrist time these days)

Appreciate your thoughts!

Erik




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ErikLdn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 07:22 AM   #2
V25V
2024 Pledge Member
 
V25V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,340
I think a 15202 should wear very well on your wrist.
V25V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 07:39 AM   #3
ErikLdn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by V25V View Post
I think a 15202 should wear very well on your wrist.


It does fit well but quite big (maybe I’m getting too used with the nimble 5167 and 37mm VC) and part of the thinking is that if it’s a bit more on the elegant side it will be more likely I use it alongside the aquanaut and the vacheron as my Rolex is currently not getting much time as too similar (steel sport) but not as amazing as the aquanaut and whilst I like to have a few watches I don’t want to have ones lying around not used just for the sake of collecting.

Will try and find some old pictures with 15202 and 14790 respectively




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ErikLdn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 08:09 AM   #4
dwatcher
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Luxury Watches
Posts: 264
Pictures could sure help get better advices
dwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 08:15 AM   #5
vlps
"TRF" Member
 
vlps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 376
the 15202 fits my 6.5 inch wrist perfectly
vlps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 08:16 AM   #6
ErikLdn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwatcher View Post
Pictures could sure help get better advices
working on it
ErikLdn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 08:17 AM   #7
ErikLdn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
Below some photos of 15202 and 14790 on my wrist but note these are for size reference only, I would look to get the watch in steel with blue dial irrespective of what reference I go for










Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ErikLdn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 08:28 AM   #8
AlexWazo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Patek
Posts: 137
I would suggest to reconsider the 15450. I haven’t had any issue with the thickness; it slides under any cuff, sweatshirt, jacket, etc. with ease. And that’s after wearing my PP perpetual for over a year straight.

It’ll be easier to source than a 15202, the movement is more durable for daily wear, it’s so comfortable I honestly forget its there sometimes, and it doesn’t get in the way during any usual daily activities. Plus you can find one new pretty easily if that’s what you desire.
AlexWazo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 08:41 AM   #9
ErikLdn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexWazo View Post
I would suggest to reconsider the 15450. I haven’t had any issue with the thickness; it slides under any cuff, sweatshirt, jacket, etc. with ease. And that’s after wearing my PP perpetual for over a year straight.

It’ll be easier to source than a 15202, the movement is more durable for daily wear, it’s so comfortable I honestly forget its there sometimes, and it doesn’t get in the way during any usual daily activities. Plus you can find one new pretty easily if that’s what you desire.
It's not so much a question of the thickness being a concern from a "convenience" perspective in daily life but rather I just feel it's disproportionate when looking at it from the side (have tried it quite a few times) and since having the aquanaut I've really gained an appreciation for thin watches. Having said that, doesn't hurt to try another time since I'm not in any particular rush!
ErikLdn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 08:56 AM   #10
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikLdn View Post
It's not so much a question of the thickness being a concern from a "convenience" perspective in daily life but rather I just feel it's disproportionate when looking at it from the side (have tried it quite a few times) and since having the aquanaut I've really gained an appreciation for thin watches. Having said that, doesn't hurt to try another time since I'm not in any particular rush!
I really don’t get why people feel that the 15450 is disproportionate. The proportions are right on in my opinion. And the case is relatively thin at 9.8mm.

Give it another try.
__________________
Adam
walds11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 08:57 AM   #11
vlps
"TRF" Member
 
vlps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 376
Here's a comparison for you comparing my aquanaut and jumbo on my 6.5 inch wrist, the 15202 pic is taken a bit closer so appears a bit larger relative


vlps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 09:00 AM   #12
bund
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: US
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikLdn View Post
Below some photos of 15202 and 14790 on my wrist but note these are for size reference only, I would look to get the watch in steel with blue dial irrespective of what reference I go for










Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
15202 looks good on you!
bund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 09:12 AM   #13
ErikLdn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by vlps View Post
Here's a comparison for you comparing my aquanaut and jumbo on my 6.5 inch wrist, the 15202 pic is taken a bit closer so appears a bit larger relative



thanks - very helpful and seeing them like that they look like two watches which complement each other very well.
ErikLdn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 09:13 AM   #14
ErikLdn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by walds11 View Post
I really don’t get why people feel that the 15450 is disproportionate. The proportions are right on in my opinion. And the case is relatively thin at 9.8mm.

Give it another try.
Appreciate the view, as said before maybe I should give it one more try before making a final decision.
ErikLdn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 10:44 AM   #15
Kjp061987
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: PAM512
Posts: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikLdn View Post
Below some photos of 15202 and 14790 on my wrist but note these are for size reference only, I would look to get the watch in steel with blue dial irrespective of what reference I go for










Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Obviously everyone has their own opinion, but to me, that 15202 looks amazing on your wrist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kjp061987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 11:34 AM   #16
toucan
"TRF" Member
 
toucan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NYC
Watch: 5970
Posts: 1,980
15202 looks great!
toucan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 03:36 PM   #17
pyceasyas123
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 68
Agree 15202! Looks great on your wrist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pyceasyas123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 05:57 PM   #18
ragnk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 76
Go get the 15202, it would be nice on you, I got that as a birthday gift for my brother he loves it so much.
ragnk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 06:42 PM   #19
SC11
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
OP must admit I agree with the above and that the 15202 does suit you very well!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ragnk View Post
Go get the 15202, it would be nice on you, I got that as a birthday gift for my brother he loves it so much.
Any sibling spaces going spare?
SC11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 08:56 PM   #20
korneevy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Yev
Location: SG/GVA/NYC/MEL ->
Watch: AP, VC, RLX, BP
Posts: 171
15202 any day of the week. 15400 is way too big and as you said, I also find it’s proportions are off.
korneevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 09:11 PM   #21
Skanse
"TRF" Member
 
Skanse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 257
15202 looks great on your wrist!


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
__________________
AP 15300ST - Rolex Daytona 116500LN - Tudor BB58 - IWC Portugieser chrono IW3714 - Breitling Colt 44
Skanse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 10:27 PM   #22
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,234
202 looks fine on you and v similar to the 67.
AK797 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 10:30 PM   #23
Nick M
"TRF" Member
 
Nick M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 228
The 15202 in the first photo seems to fit you well.

As another reference point, here’s my old 5167 and current 15450. 6.5” wrist

Having had the 5167, the 15450 was the only model in the AP line that gave a similar feeling of “right” proportion on my wrist (and visually).



__________________
"When a man has a world in his hands, you expect to find a Rolex on his wrist."
Nick M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2018, 10:52 PM   #24
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
15202 looks awesome
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2018, 02:27 AM   #25
cascavel
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,857
The 15450 is a beautiful extremely wearable AP which sells for half the price of the 15202 and has none of the quirky movement hassles. In addition it is available with a lot of dial color variations and has a screw down crown for better water resistance.
cascavel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2018, 03:35 AM   #26
CoveWatch
"TRF" Member
 
CoveWatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: SoCal
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 4,535
I agree that the 15202 looks fantastic on your wrist in the pictures! In regards to the 15450, seems you already have doubt so i really don't think trying it on again will change anything, go with whatever you like best! GOod Luck!
CoveWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2018, 08:45 AM   #27
T3F
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 457
The 15202 looks great! I have one and it fits my 6.5-6.75" wrist perfectly. The 15450 would also be a good option and is a bit cheaper and easier to get. In my opinion, the 14790 looks terrible on your wrist -- it's too small and the proportions are all off. Remember that the Royal Oak was designed to fill up your wrist.
__________________
Instagram: @watchadmiral
T3F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2018, 08:55 AM   #28
blacke90
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: AP||Panerai||Rolex
Posts: 759
Saw the photos you posted and you can't go wrong with the 15202 as it looks good on your wrist. Definitely go for it! Skip the 15450 and the 15400. 39mm is the sweet spot. I did however picked up the AP Blue Chrono 26331 recently, interesting enough the Chrono, while physically bigger than the 15400, wears smaller than the 15400. Keep us posted!
blacke90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2018, 02:51 PM   #29
holdtime
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikLdn View Post
thanks - very helpful and seeing them like that they look like two watches which complement each other very well.
PP Looks good AP little big in your wrist.
holdtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2018, 03:26 PM   #30
steeevvvooo
"TRF" Member
 
steeevvvooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London
Posts: 1,365
I went into an AP boutique today. 41mm felt a little big and 37mm too small. Guess I have funny size wrists as I think they look great on everyone else's photos!
__________________
Once you aquire your "grail"... then what?!
steeevvvooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.