ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 March 2011, 06:58 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Milan
Location: Sydney
Posts: 898
|
Nice shots everyone, here is a couple more.
190 I currently own. And the 292 I let go. |
30 March 2011, 07:18 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Wow - I know a 341 is massive to Start with and those wrist pix are simply amazing.
Amazingly... massive on that wrist. 341 is an amazing piece of kit and not many people can pull it off. Am I the only thinking that is just too big by looking at those writ pix? Thanks for the pix through. Nice to see some real life pix. My apologies in advance, but I mean - size matters, but wearing a "clock sized watch" just isn't cool. I'm sure it isnt an image Panerai intended. I will probably get flamed from some people for this, but hey... Nice pix everyone. /I will get my coat on the way out |
30 March 2011, 08:03 AM | #33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
|
Quote:
+1. NO OFFENCE INTENDED & APOLOGIES IN ADVANCE..... Thanks for showing your watch & posting the pic's: ....but as an unashamed Panerai Virgin I honestly thought those were 'joke shots' which had been photo-shopped or something. I honestly don't mean any offence & I'm sure it's a remarkable timepiece of great horological & monetary value......... I just don't think I could wear it & I'd be surprised if anyone could 'pull it off' in real life. Sorry. (Note to mods: Can we get some kinda "Peace" smilie or something?!? )
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards. Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb........... It's about how well you can bounce!! TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010 |
|
30 March 2011, 08:14 AM | #34 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 675
|
|
30 March 2011, 08:48 AM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
|
Quote:
To make a long story short the watch was originally made for the Egyptian navy and was intended to be worn on the outside of those big bulky diving suits.. Also it was commissioned design for panerai to come up with an indistructable watch.. Please keep in mind that this watch was intended for active field work only and only a few originals still exist from the original 50 watches made. People love panerai bc of it's history and the unique and classic styling of the watch... It's models like the 341 that represent the birth of such styling into a modern form factor.. The 341 happenes to be one of the most controversial watches that the company has made to date due to it's size.. It's meant as a collectors piece.. If you truly know the brand then you would understand especially after seeing some of the huge wrist compasses and depth gauges they used to make as true tool pieces. But I can see why people think it looks rediculous when they really don't understand the history behind panerai.. It's not like this is a regular production.. |
|
30 March 2011, 09:06 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Quote:
yes, i know the same can be said for a Rolex DSSD or Omega PloProf or (insert naother classic/re-issued diver here), but how many people actually dive with one... |
|
30 March 2011, 09:06 AM | #37 | |
Vacated
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Marc
Location: Connecticut
Watch: PAM 111 'N'
Posts: 2,558
|
Quote:
__________________
NAWCC Member Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Executive Dorklehead |
|
30 March 2011, 09:16 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Here's an oldie but goodie:
|
30 March 2011, 09:20 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
|
|
30 March 2011, 09:22 AM | #40 |
Vacated
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Marc
Location: Connecticut
Watch: PAM 111 'N'
Posts: 2,558
|
Hell yeah we could pull that watch off, Bruno!
__________________
NAWCC Member Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Executive Dorklehead |
30 March 2011, 09:26 AM | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
|
|
30 March 2011, 10:43 AM | #42 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Brampton
Watch: Panerai PAM 268
Posts: 31
|
|
30 March 2011, 11:28 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
|
|
30 March 2011, 11:29 AM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
|
Quote:
thanks for the support! at least someone gets it! |
|
30 March 2011, 11:40 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
__________________
member#3242 |
30 March 2011, 11:54 AM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
|
Quote:
if panerai thought this watch to be truly logical for this day in age for real use, then it would be a regular production.... its only rated to 100 meters which is nothing.. i would never dive in this watch and don't know anyone else that would... the DSSD is great because regardless if you're going to dive down that far, at least you know it will. which is an incredable watch with alot of engineering behind it. thats what i see when i look at the DSSD which is why i bought one. i think its amazing how rolex designed the DSSD. i look at the DSSD is more of an instrument then a watch. infact its an instrument with great styling . at the time in the 50's when the egiziano was being made, it was considered state of the art.. now, its not. it's purely for collectors who truly understand the tools panerai used to make... not just watches as stated before.. if you understood that then im sure you would be thinking different and saying different things then you are now. if you say you know and understand the history of panerai then what your saying makes no sense. its a huge watch, you have made that clear... there are a bunch of other models for you to choose from... so what does it matter really if panerai came out with a one time production watch of this size for die hard fans? since you obviously have stated your feelings about the 341, then surely you can understand the market the 341 appeals to.. you said and i quote "clock sized watch" just isn't cool. I'm sure it isnt an image Panerai intended to answer that. it is exactly what panerai meant to do when they made it in the 50's and when they made it now.. nothing has changed about it. so please don't say you understand and already know all the history about the egiziano when all you're saying is "it's a clock sized watch" heres another perfect example the pam 300 mare nostrum. originally panerai made in a much smaller version for a re-launch in 2003 which was not true to the original design conceived by panerai in 1943 . panerai had never launched the mare nostrum as it was only a prototype back in 1943.. they launched it years later in a smaller version in 2003. now for 2010 release they have relaunched it in the original size of 52mm. now if i were to remove the crown protector off my 341, it would be close in size to the mare. heres a pic of the earlier version and the new version side by side so you can see how much larger the watch is. now you might not like that watch either due to the size, but my point is, history is history. if you truly understood the history then you would not be putting the 341 down. you would see the vintage nostalgia panerai was aiming for. heres a group shot of all the original instrument pieces. way back then the egiziano was considered and still considered a piece of equipment rather than a watch. panerai was smart enough to think of putting their diving instruments on straps so the divers didnt have to hold them in their hands. panerai are the pioneers when it comes to stuff like this. not trying to convince anyone to like this watch, its just when i hear comments like "its a clock sized watch" or "it looks rediculous" i just want to share some info to make anyone understand why it is of that size.. |
|
30 March 2011, 12:02 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
that 300 is soooo money. I wish they'd make it in 44
__________________
member#3242 |
30 March 2011, 12:16 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
|
|
30 March 2011, 01:03 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
Yeah, they did in 42mm. I would like a modern reasonable price 44.
|
1 April 2011, 02:11 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 116
|
|
1 April 2011, 02:20 AM | #51 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Quote:
now, if a random someone wearing an Egyptian on his/her bare wrist, then it may give an impression of "a clock sized watch" - simply because would look big and it was not used for its purpose/intention. but then again - how many people actually use their watch for its original purpose/intention nowadays? i admit - i'm one of them. |
|
1 April 2011, 10:54 AM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jon
Location: New England
Watch: --Rolex--
Posts: 2,391
|
This is my 232!! I have a small wrist but surprisingly it wears very well even on mine!!
|
1 April 2011, 11:30 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: TIAN
Location: Shanghai,China
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1
|
268
|
1 April 2011, 11:56 AM | #54 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
|
Quote:
but i guess its just when you had said "just isn't cool. I'm sure it isnt an image Panerai intended. " that got me flustered. so i felt the need to let you know it is exactly what panerai meant to do and it is cool, because of the history behind it. |
|
1 April 2011, 12:20 PM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Nice pics, love the rad 210!
|
1 April 2011, 01:32 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 61
|
PAM 322 and PAM 309
|
1 April 2011, 11:51 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
322 and 309
__________________
member#3242 |
4 April 2011, 02:26 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Nice photos!
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
2 June 2011, 02:33 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 116
|
|
2 June 2011, 02:44 AM | #60 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,529
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.