ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 February 2010, 11:37 AM | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
|
19 February 2010, 01:16 PM | #62 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
|
|
19 February 2010, 01:55 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
Well each to their own, it has to be personal
preference, but I've known people fly the atlantic just to get that finish!! |
19 February 2010, 02:17 PM | #64 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
|
19 February 2010, 04:14 PM | #65 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Danny
Location: Denmark
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
So the only difference between the 6239 and the 6262 i the the 72 or 727 movment? Last edited by gufle; 19 February 2010 at 04:16 PM.. Reason: Added a question |
|
19 February 2010, 04:21 PM | #66 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
I had to go to my safty deposit box and take some stock. Here is a photo of my rig.
|
19 February 2010, 04:34 PM | #67 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Box, I don't need no stinking box..........
|
19 February 2010, 10:23 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
Great info Jed, an education in vintage, thanks
|
19 February 2010, 11:55 PM | #69 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Quote:
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...ighlight=bevel Here are a couple more pictures. I was drinking a few last night and forgot some I think. |
|
20 February 2010, 12:31 AM | #70 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Quote:
|
|
20 February 2010, 12:59 AM | #71 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
This bevel is horrible IMO. If mine would have come back looking like this........I would have sued them. It seriously reduces the size and shape of the lugs. It's not uniform on the end/corner where the bevel becomes very wide. They took a lot of medal off.
http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767...-%26gt%3B+more |
20 February 2010, 02:36 AM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
Dad's I am not sure what the point of linking to the previous link about polishing the edges of the vintage watches is as it seems many people had different opinions often based on preference. I would rather value the opinion of a few how seem to have real vintage knowledge.
It would be great to see you put your watch on the market with its non original replacements and see if vintage buyers have such a high opinion as you have of your watch. |
20 February 2010, 03:38 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
I would be proud to own both Dennis and Dad's vintage Rolex, just fantastic watches. Even though Dads does go on a bit. Since I found out that I have no place in Pav's will, no more praise for his watches.
__________________
..33 |
20 February 2010, 04:21 AM | #74 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
Thank you for the kind words. I only posed a pic of mine to reply to the post that a 6239 does not have the word "Daytona" written on the dial. Lets remember Rolex did strange things with Daytonas around this time period as far as dials. As Jedly pointed out some can have no Daytona some can have it in several different locations depending on the dial.
Dads, the bevel may not be your cup 'o tea but most collectors would die for a bevel like you showed on nice thick lugs. The DRSD is a beauty and a rare watch indeed. We all have our preferences and should respect another person's as well. JMHO =) maverick |
20 February 2010, 04:31 AM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
sorry dadwatch, if i had known the conversation started with explorer 2 orange hands, i'd have thought to post this up straight away.
I'll say again to you what i said to steve (lol-x) at dinner on monday night, the bevel is factory original, it is how the watch was supplied and how if polished correctly to manufacturers spec it wil be kept. if you dont like it great, it's a free world, polish it out, but to say it has been done from poor workmanship is incorrect and mis informed, it is particulalry hard to acheive and in my experience only Rolex UK and Rolex Genenva have the ability or inclination to do it correctly. in that linked thread dadswatch, you show modern cases which are completely different or you show incorrectly polished cases with a minimal bevel or squared edges, you will find thousands of examples like that and by far and away the majority are like that, that is why when maintained and done correctly they are prized in collecting circles. a friends NOS totally unworn 1655 as it left the factory, he was lucky enough to buy a pair that were bought and never worn. compare it to the one steve started that other thread with. |
20 February 2010, 04:48 AM | #76 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jon
Location: New England
Watch: --Rolex--
Posts: 2,391
|
Quote:
|
|
20 February 2010, 05:06 AM | #77 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
If your friend ever wants to sell it.... I am the buyer. |
|
20 February 2010, 05:10 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
Talk about a time capsule Rolex. If that came on the market I'd pop a hole in the piggy bank and enter the bidding myself.
__________________
..33 |
20 February 2010, 05:16 AM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
If I remember right the other of the pair was sold, and realized about a 50-60% premium over what a really good example was selling for at the time !!
|
20 February 2010, 05:49 AM | #80 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
|
20 February 2010, 07:09 AM | #81 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Quote:
And to comment on your comment in regard to my watch.....they seem to like it in the Vintage Rolex Forum and it is in their dial archive. And the non original replacements (service replacement parts) were the only option I had besides searching for them on the open market. When I looked for them, I found a lot of nothing and fakes. The original bezel went the way of the Dodo bird so I was forced into a decision. If I had searched for and was lucky enough to find the parts needed to restore the bezel parts (which I did in vain) then I would be limited to a very few and most in poor condition. I was told that the replacement bezel came from Geneva. Its the same as the original I was told. Now the insert and pearl are different and everyone can see they aren't exactly the same as the original. Now I know a few places to find an insert and it wouldn't be a big stretch to get an original faded and scratched up insert with an original Tritium pearl. I think Steve M. was selling these pearls not too long ago. Same goes with the crystal. If someone wanted to replace the perfectly good service replacement crystal with a superdome then go for it. All and all its not going to break the bank. I know there would be some "vintage guys" that raise an eyebrow at the insert/pearl. Maybe even a few would do the same with the replacement 93150 bracelet. I respect the collectors that seek, own, and restore "all original" watches. If I put my watch for sale on the open market as you suggest, I think some would pass it right by and some would want to replace those service parts. Some would keep it just the way RUSA left it. It would be a mish mash of opinions. This is why restraunts have menu's. We all have different tastes. |
|
20 February 2010, 07:13 AM | #82 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
And btw, I'm pretty sure onkyo knows (I hope you do buddy) I was just having a bit of fun with that little pissing match about our watches. I had to fire back after I lost round one with Welshman's comment about his "rig". I think it's an awsome example (almost as nice as mine).
|
20 February 2010, 07:21 AM | #83 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
|
|
20 February 2010, 07:23 AM | #84 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
ps.... I liked your comment "he's a show off" .... made me really |
|
20 February 2010, 07:31 AM | #85 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
You know......your gonna make me buy a box and book to go with my watch. And you'll crap when I throw a superdome on the thing.
|
20 February 2010, 08:27 AM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: leeds,uk
Watch: BLUE ARAB DAYTONA
Posts: 691
|
interesting thing i have noticed is that on the letter from Rolex service dept on dadswatch is it says(couldnt read it right as my eyes are not what they were) something like "replacement value if lost $7000" now im defo not an expert but is it not worth a lot more?
and are they saying that if its lost they will only give funds for a new one? |
20 February 2010, 08:33 AM | #87 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Quote:
Yeah, I would say it's probably worth at least $8,000. $9,000 if it had the original bezel and insert. |
|
20 February 2010, 08:54 AM | #88 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Quote:
Here is another Mark IV for comparison with what appears to be finer bevel. |
|
20 February 2010, 09:33 AM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
I think I follow what you are trying to say, the simple answer sometimes is that ones with a bevelled style original edge provide a bit of an optical illusion and if you actually put half a dozen watches on a table the ones that look fatter and square cut often aren't when you put them next to an unpolished orginal but with rgards to the one you show that you say should be fatter, obviously that isn't neccessairly so, width will depend on how many services / polishes etc, what we are talking about is the correct and original STYLE of polishing, but if that had had three and the othEr only ne then obviously it would be thinner!!
You can't pull up diiferent watches that have been serviced and compare lug widths when you have no idea how many services or depths if dings had to be removed etc. What is beyond doubt is the correct and original style as per the nos examples shown. |
20 February 2010, 11:00 AM | #90 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.