|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 April 2017, 10:02 PM
|
#31 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
I'll go 5513
|
|
|
|
23 April 2017, 11:13 PM
|
#32 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 794
|
1016
|
|
|
|
|
25 April 2017, 06:35 PM
|
#33 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
Posts: 39
|
@ Boomer... beautiful pair of watches.
|
|
|
|
|
25 April 2017, 06:37 PM
|
#34 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
Posts: 39
|
@Bob K... Yup, you go it correctly... :)
|
|
|
|
|
25 April 2017, 08:06 PM
|
#35 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,344
|
1016 for me.
Where are we at count-wise? Should have made a poll of this... |
|
|
|
|
26 April 2017, 03:38 AM
|
#36 | |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 2,956
|
Quote:
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
|
|
|
|
|
27 April 2017, 08:35 AM
|
#37 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 11
|
1016 for me! Final answer!!
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
27 April 2017, 12:56 PM
|
#38 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 226
|
1016 for me, a bit less common watch in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
10 May 2017, 02:08 PM
|
#39 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Watch: Omega 2504.52
Posts: 114
|
1016 is timeless, understated, and sophisticated. Gets my vote.
|
|
|
|
|
10 May 2017, 02:20 PM
|
#40 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York, NY
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,169
|
I have a 6" wrist so 1016 for me.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
10 May 2017, 09:11 PM
|
#41 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,595
|
5513 due to larger size
|
|
|
|
|
10 May 2017, 10:18 PM
|
#42 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex 16760
Posts: 181
|
5513. Didn't Steve McQueen wear one? He was the King of Cool, after all.
I'm wanting a vintage Sub. I do like the 1016 but if I had to choose it'd be the 5513. |
|
|
|
|
10 May 2017, 10:27 PM
|
#43 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Brad
Location: Colorado
Watch: 16613
Posts: 1,254
|
I think their are fewer 1016s...that's my choice.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 May 2017, 11:22 PM
|
#44 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: "H"
Location: England
Watch: ing Rainclouds
Posts: 1,437
|
By Choice
5513 for me,
|
|
|
|
|
10 May 2017, 11:51 PM
|
#45 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Rodney Price
Location: Virginia
Watch: None yet
Posts: 9
|
1016 all day long - very nearly the perfect watch. (I would prefer the coronet at the 12 o'clock position like the Japanese edition of the 116000).
|
|
|
|
|
11 May 2017, 01:34 AM
|
#46 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: SoCal
Watch: BLNR55131675BB58
Posts: 829
|
5513 v. 1016
This is tough, I've been a Sub/GMT guy for a few years now and my 5513 is the jewel of my collection, but I recently aquired a modified OP "blue explorer" and I'm now smitten with the 36mm case and super legible dial. I think a 1016 is next on my list to round out the iconic trio 5513/1675/1016. As for which one I'd choose, for the moment it's still 5513 but it may well start to tip toward the explorer soon.
 
|
|
|
|
|
11 May 2017, 01:41 AM
|
#47 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 54
|
1016 for me! Can't get enough of mine.
|
|
|
|
|
11 May 2017, 02:24 AM
|
#48 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,010
|
1016 for the simple reason it's about 10 times cooler than the 5513!
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
