ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dcherry525 · 7 May 2011, 12:22 PM

Guys

A few weeks ago you talked me into keeping my Rolex instead of selling for a Breitling Blackbird. Now I have a dilemma? I really love the SS Sub. Should I trade my EXP II for one of the last 16610's or splurge and trade for the 116610?

I am really a one watch at a time kinda guy, but I have also thought about keeping the ExpII and trying to find a 10460 Sub ND on the forums. Especially since I am going to spend a few thousand to upgrade to the 116610. What are your thoughts.

I'd like to hear from the Sub owners.

Jannal · 7 May 2011, 12:31 PM

pics says it all.

TSts · 7 May 2011, 12:34 PM

Yes, I would.

guyrolex · 7 May 2011, 01:13 PM

I would definitely trade for either without hesitation, and between the two subs- definitely the new Sub C- the extra couple thousand is worth the upgraded case, dial, bracelet and clasp

DCgator · 7 May 2011, 02:20 PM

Consider the 16610LV as well. Yes, get the SubC, it's a hell of a better watch then the ExpII.

SaddleSC · 7 May 2011, 02:22 PM

Trade it for the 116610LN Sub C in a heartbeat.

tkc324 · 7 May 2011, 02:30 PM

I would...

Noriki · 7 May 2011, 03:07 PM

Don't you want to consider the EXII is giving you a 2 time zone?

skyedog · 7 May 2011, 03:13 PM

YES! 116610 for sure!

stockae92 · 7 May 2011, 03:19 PM

I found the Exp II to be a more comfortable daily wear, YMMV

And with the 14060M, you have best of both world

CDNWatchNut · 7 May 2011, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stockae92

I found the Exp II to be a more comfortable daily wear, YMMV

And with the 14060M, you have best of both world

+1...assuming your EXP II is a polar dial, then a sub 14060(m) would would make a great complement.

That's what I did anyway.

toolr · 7 May 2011, 03:35 PM

I would rather have the 16610 over the 16570 or the 116610.

watchf · 7 May 2011, 04:25 PM

If you like the style of the sub and the GMT function of the Exp II maybe consider a GMT II?

rms · 7 May 2011, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCgator

Consider the 16610LV as well. Yes, get the SubC, it's a hell of a better watch then the ExpII.

Really? "Hell of a better watch".

I'd love to see you try and keep track of 2 time zones with a Sub! They are both GREAT watches with very different "tool" purposes. Personally I'm not a fan of the new super case, but that is just my opinion.

Grumpy Badger · 7 May 2011, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDNWatchNut

+1...assuming your EXP II is a polar dial, then a sub 14060(m) would would make a great complement.

That's what I did anyway.

You hit the nail on the head.

steubi1 · 7 May 2011, 06:26 PM

Yes, of course, if you have a chance to do that.

Tom

ayres · 7 May 2011, 06:32 PM

dollars wise, i wouldn't do it if i were you.

people are asking way too much for a 16610. maybe a year or so ago, the trade up would have been reasonable, but not right now.

the fact is, for however much more you would pay, the sub is not that much better than an explorer2.

you're better off waiting.

Runnin' Rebel · 7 May 2011, 07:10 PM

yup

xjeeunitx · 7 May 2011, 07:13 PM

Did you buy your Explorer II pre-owned or brand new from the AD? What I'm trying to say is, it's going to cost you some money... if you're going for the Sub C. I'd do it but definitely think about the finances of it. If you're taking a huge hit on the watch, I wouldn't.

dcherry525 · 7 May 2011, 09:49 PM

I bought the watch pre-owned. It would be an even credit for what I paid for.

tomchicago · 7 May 2011, 11:02 PM

cherry i considered the same thing as you, but after trying on the sub and finding the very large crown uncomfortable, i kept my EII. make sure you try them on and keep them on your wrist for a bit. the crown on the sub is huge.

HDHNTER · 7 May 2011, 11:24 PM

Absolutely, I replaced my SS Daytona and TT Blue Sub with the Sub C and I have zero regret over the decision. The new Sub is that good.

karmatp · 7 May 2011, 11:49 PM

I parted with a couple of watches to get the funds for my Sub C, and I could not be happier.

If you are buying a Sub, it has to be the Sub C. In the big scheme of things, it's not much more money for a watch that has so many improvements, is so worth the money.

The difference between the Sub C and the "old" sub was $1200 at my local AD, heck, the clasp alone is worth the difference and you get all the other upgrades as well.

aleiberman · 8 May 2011, 01:35 AM

i would keep your exp II and get a good deal on a 14060m. great value for the money on those. that is what i did. you will then have two very different tool watches. keep both for a bit , and then let one go if you have to do so.

JJ Irani · 8 May 2011, 01:37 AM

Yes for sure, but the older Sub 16610!! Still an all time classic.

JJ

nolawis · 8 May 2011, 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toolr

i would rather have the 16610 over the 16570 or the 116610.

+1

UJU · 8 May 2011, 02:17 AM

Yes. I would trade in the Exporer II for the Sub.
I sold this:

To get this:

No regrets.

Paul88 · 8 May 2011, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Yes for sure, but the older Sub 16610!! Still an all time classic.

JJ

horseco · 8 May 2011, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guyrolex

I would definitely trade for either without hesitation, and between the two subs- definitely the new Sub C- the extra couple thousand is worth the upgraded case, dial, bracelet and clasp

agreed...

Art 1 · 8 May 2011, 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcherry525

Guys

A few weeks ago you talked me into keeping my Rolex instead of selling for a Breitling Blackbird. Now I have a dilemma? I really love the SS Sub. Should I trade my EXP II for one of the last 16610's or splurge and trade for the 116610?

I am really a one watch at a time kinda guy, but I have also thought about keeping the ExpII and trying to find a 10460 Sub ND on the forums. Especially since I am going to spend a few thousand to upgrade to the 116610. What are your thoughts.

I'd like to hear from the Sub owners.

I would not sell the Ex2 to get one of the Subs that you mention. No way.

7 May 2011, 12:22 PM	#1
dcherry525 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Dwayne Location: MD Watch: EXP II / Sub 16610 Posts: 15	Should I trade Explorer II for 16610 or 116610? Guys A few weeks ago you talked me into keeping my Rolex instead of selling for a Breitling Blackbird. Now I have a dilemma? I really love the SS Sub. Should I trade my EXP II for one of the last 16610's or splurge and trade for the 116610? I am really a one watch at a time kinda guy, but I have also thought about keeping the ExpII and trying to find a 10460 Sub ND on the forums. Especially since I am going to spend a few thousand to upgrade to the 116610. What are your thoughts. I'd like to hear from the Sub owners.

7 May 2011, 12:34 PM	#3
TSts "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: So-Cal USA Posts: 1,067	Yes, I would. __________________ 116710LN 116300blro

7 May 2011, 02:22 PM	#6
SaddleSC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Charles B Location: GMT -7 Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 6,125	Trade it for the 116610LN Sub C in a heartbeat. __________________ Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB

7 May 2011, 11:24 PM	#22
HDHNTER "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Allen Location: SC Posts: 2,766	Absolutely, I replaced my SS Daytona and TT Blue Sub with the Sub C and I have zero regret over the decision. The new Sub is that good. __________________ Instagram @HDHNTER

7 May 2011, 11:49 PM	#23
karmatp "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Trevor Location: Arizona Posts: 5,740	I parted with a couple of watches to get the funds for my Sub C, and I could not be happier. If you are buying a Sub, it has to be the Sub C. In the big scheme of things, it's not much more money for a watch that has so many improvements, is so worth the money. The difference between the Sub C and the "old" sub was $1200 at my local AD, heck, the clasp alone is worth the difference and you get all the other upgrades as well. __________________ My grails:

7 May 2011, 01:13 PM	#4
guyrolex Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: John Location: Canada Watch: DSSD, SubC LV Posts: 258	I would definitely trade for either without hesitation, and between the two subs- definitely the new Sub C- the extra couple thousand is worth the upgraded case, dial, bracelet and clasp

7 May 2011, 02:20 PM	#5
DCgator "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: PNW Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2 Posts: 8,123	Consider the 16610LV as well. Yes, get the SubC, it's a hell of a better watch then the ExpII.

7 May 2011, 02:30 PM	#7
tkc324 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Tom Location: Chi town Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub Posts: 3,717	I would...

7 May 2011, 03:07 PM	#8
Noriki "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Bangkok Watch: Mix Posts: 253	Don't you want to consider the EXII is giving you a 2 time zone?

7 May 2011, 03:13 PM	#9
skyedog "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Joey Location: around the Bay Watch: ing TRF Posts: 1,942	YES! 116610 for sure!

7 May 2011, 03:19 PM	#10
stockae92 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Socal Posts: 4,883	I found the Exp II to be a more comfortable daily wear, YMMV And with the 14060M, you have best of both world

7 May 2011, 03:35 PM	#12
toolr 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Northwest Posts: 1,339	I would rather have the 16610 over the 16570 or the 116610.

7 May 2011, 04:25 PM	#13
watchf "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Australia Posts: 2,458	If you like the style of the sub and the GMT function of the Exp II maybe consider a GMT II?

7 May 2011, 06:26 PM	#16
steubi1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Tom Location: Switzerland Watch: too many Posts: 1,149	Yes, of course, if you have a chance to do that. Tom

7 May 2011, 06:32 PM	#17
ayres "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: honolulu Watch: whatever runs Posts: 551	dollars wise, i wouldn't do it if i were you. people are asking way too much for a 16610. maybe a year or so ago, the trade up would have been reasonable, but not right now. the fact is, for however much more you would pay, the sub is not that much better than an explorer2. you're better off waiting.

7 May 2011, 07:13 PM	#19
xjeeunitx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,430	Did you buy your Explorer II pre-owned or brand new from the AD? What I'm trying to say is, it's going to cost you some money... if you're going for the Sub C. I'd do it but definitely think about the finances of it. If you're taking a huge hit on the watch, I wouldn't.

7 May 2011, 09:49 PM	#20
dcherry525 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Dwayne Location: MD Watch: EXP II / Sub 16610 Posts: 15	I bought the watch pre-owned. It would be an even credit for what I paid for.

7 May 2011, 11:02 PM	#21
tomchicago Banned Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Chicago Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270. Posts: 2,717	cherry i considered the same thing as you, but after trying on the sub and finding the very large crown uncomfortable, i kept my EII. make sure you try them on and keep them on your wrist for a bit. the crown on the sub is huge.

8 May 2011, 01:35 AM	#24
aleiberman "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Aaron Location: MA Watch: Rolex Posts: 501	i would keep your exp II and get a good deal on a 14060m. great value for the money on those. that is what i did. you will then have two very different tool watches. keep both for a bit , and then let one go if you have to do so.

8 May 2011, 01:37 AM	#25
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,320	Yes for sure, but the older Sub 16610!! Still an all time classic. JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

8 May 2011, 02:17 AM	#27
UJU "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Norway Watch: 14060M Posts: 274	Yes. I would trade in the Exporer II for the Sub. I sold this: To get this: No regrets.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)