The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 May 2011, 01:32 PM   #1
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
Is Each Rolex Subtly Different?

If someone swapped yours during the night could you tell? Without using 'personal scratch recognition'?
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 01:36 PM   #2
Grumpy Badger
"TRF" Member
 
Grumpy Badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
I honestly don't know...

I think the wear and screeches are the only way I could tell, but I've never had a close enough experience of another 14060m to say for sure.
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts!

"You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life."
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS.
Grumpy Badger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 01:55 PM   #3
watchf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
I doubt I will be able to tell the difference if they replaced it with the same model but hopefully they swap it for one that is authetic and BNIB

BTW did you replace 'wife' with 'Rolex' at the last minute before hitting the post button
watchf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 01:56 PM   #4
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
If say I see another identical model I can tell it's not mine... Somehow, it's like a very very subtle difference in contours or dimensions or something...can't put my finger on it.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 01:58 PM   #5
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchf View Post
I doubt I will be able to tell the difference if they replaced it with the same model but hopefully they swap it for one that is authetic and BNIB

BTW did you replace 'wife' with 'Rolex' at the last minute before hitting the post button
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 04:33 PM   #6
clarencek
"TRF" Member
 
clarencek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
If someone swapped yours during the night could you tell? Without using 'personal scratch recognition'?
Oddly yes. I've owned multiples of the same model and each was unique. From the bracelet clasp feel to the winding crown each watch was different.
I think it's mostly due to the wear and tear differing by model. I've had 14060 where the crown was slightly gritty, my second 16610LV bracelet clasp was very tight, etc.
clarencek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 05:03 PM   #7
applebook
"TRF" Member
 
applebook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
Since these watches are mostly machined, there should be barely 1% difference among them in proportions when they leave the factory. After that, anything goes because people use them differently and wear them all across the globe.
__________________
applebook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 01:38 AM   #8
rolexertion
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
Let's put it this way: I sold a car in a major city. Five or more years later it showed up on the street near where I live. I knew it instantly. There was just something about it, call in an aura, that made me sure it was my old car. I talked to the owner and he confirmed it.
rolexertion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 01:42 AM   #9
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
It might have been the pink seatcovers.........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 01:45 AM   #10
Route 66
"TRF" Member
 
Route 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Burbank, CA
Watch: 214270 Mark II
Posts: 4,121
Unless the switched watch had a lot of scratches on it, I don't think I could tell the difference.
Route 66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 01:49 AM   #11
Numismatist
"TRF" Member
 
Numismatist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
I would be really mad at whoever did it!
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB
Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP
Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP
Numismatist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 03:08 AM   #12
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
I think if the seconds hand moved in one second jumps I'd have a good idea.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 03:11 AM   #13
GolfPunk
"TRF" Member
 
GolfPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Gary
Location: UK
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 4,395
Easy - I'd look at the serial number in the rehaut
GolfPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 03:15 AM   #14
indeuce
"TRF" Member
 
indeuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SF Bay Area, Ca.
Posts: 127
when i purchased my 14060m at my local ad, i had the opportunity to see two and pick the one i wanted. i noticed the little triangle just below the pearl was sized slightly different due to the placement of the pearl. that was about it.
indeuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 03:23 AM   #15
rickinAZ
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by applebook View Post
Since these watches are mostly machined, there should be barely 1% difference among them in proportions when they leave the factory. After that, anything goes because people use them differently and wear them all across the globe.
1% difference would be HUGE. Try 1% of 1%. We are talking really tight manufacturing tolerances. And...no, no one on this group could ID their watch without scratch assistance.
rickinAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 03:23 AM   #16
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
I can't believe I'm alone on this one. Just looking at the chamfering on mine I can tell that they are 'hand chased', so to speak. They aren't exactly 100% equal on all four sides. With all this modern CAD stuff now I'm sure they could make them all completely identical down to the amount of material removed when finishing.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 03:29 AM   #17
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
May I speculate that you don't look as closely and for as long as me? :p
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 04:19 AM   #18
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
Every 5512,5513,1680 and 1675 is different. No two have the same patina, bezel fade, dial, or tritium.

I could pick mine out of a pile at a distance.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 04:47 AM   #19
ArcticMoose
"TRF" Member
 
ArcticMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
Yep, the spec of dust on the dial and uneven lume is unique to each one. :-)
ArcticMoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 04:52 AM   #20
Dweller of the Sea
"TRF" Member
 
Dweller of the Sea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: EU
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 576
They all look the same.
I have even seen good fakes that look the same.
Would probably not be a very good production line, if the all looked different.
Dweller of the Sea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 04:54 AM   #21
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
I put it down to owning more than one, and not noticing anymore. :p
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 04:57 AM   #22
Chipmunk
"TRF" Member
 
Chipmunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
Probably not.
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats

Chipmunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 01:52 PM   #23
Boopie
"TRF" Member
 
Boopie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 3,764
I have worn my YM for 10+ years, so it has its share of scratches, particularly on the PCL, so I would know.

If it were brand new, not so much. I don't think there is anything unique about the case, face, hands, or bezel that I can detect.
Boopie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 03:31 PM   #24
applebook
"TRF" Member
 
applebook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticMoose View Post
Yep, the spec of dust on the dial and uneven lume is unique to each one. :-)
LOL.

Methinks some people here are being quite romantic about their watches. We should have a get-together and do a "blind" test to determine if one could indeed pick one out from the other.
__________________
applebook is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.