ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 May 2011, 01:32 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
|
Is Each Rolex Subtly Different?
If someone swapped yours during the night could you tell? Without using 'personal scratch recognition'?
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
9 May 2011, 01:36 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
|
I honestly don't know...
I think the wear and screeches are the only way I could tell, but I've never had a close enough experience of another 14060m to say for sure.
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS. |
9 May 2011, 01:55 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
I doubt I will be able to tell the difference if they replaced it with the same model but hopefully they swap it for one that is authetic and BNIB
BTW did you replace 'wife' with 'Rolex' at the last minute before hitting the post button |
9 May 2011, 01:56 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
|
If say I see another identical model I can tell it's not mine... Somehow, it's like a very very subtle difference in contours or dimensions or something...can't put my finger on it.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
9 May 2011, 01:58 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
|
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
9 May 2011, 04:33 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 400
|
Quote:
I think it's mostly due to the wear and tear differing by model. I've had 14060 where the crown was slightly gritty, my second 16610LV bracelet clasp was very tight, etc. |
|
9 May 2011, 05:03 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
|
Since these watches are mostly machined, there should be barely 1% difference among them in proportions when they leave the factory. After that, anything goes because people use them differently and wear them all across the globe.
__________________
|
10 May 2011, 01:38 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
|
Let's put it this way: I sold a car in a major city. Five or more years later it showed up on the street near where I live. I knew it instantly. There was just something about it, call in an aura, that made me sure it was my old car. I talked to the owner and he confirmed it.
|
10 May 2011, 01:42 AM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
|
It might have been the pink seatcovers.........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
10 May 2011, 01:45 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Burbank, CA
Watch: 214270 Mark II
Posts: 4,121
|
Unless the switched watch had a lot of scratches on it, I don't think I could tell the difference.
|
10 May 2011, 01:49 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
|
I would be really mad at whoever did it!
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP |
10 May 2011, 03:08 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
I think if the seconds hand moved in one second jumps I'd have a good idea.
|
10 May 2011, 03:11 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Gary
Location: UK
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 4,395
|
Easy - I'd look at the serial number in the rehaut
|
10 May 2011, 03:15 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SF Bay Area, Ca.
Posts: 127
|
when i purchased my 14060m at my local ad, i had the opportunity to see two and pick the one i wanted. i noticed the little triangle just below the pearl was sized slightly different due to the placement of the pearl. that was about it.
|
10 May 2011, 03:23 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 16
|
1% difference would be HUGE. Try 1% of 1%. We are talking really tight manufacturing tolerances. And...no, no one on this group could ID their watch without scratch assistance.
|
10 May 2011, 03:23 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
|
I can't believe I'm alone on this one. Just looking at the chamfering on mine I can tell that they are 'hand chased', so to speak. They aren't exactly 100% equal on all four sides. With all this modern CAD stuff now I'm sure they could make them all completely identical down to the amount of material removed when finishing.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
10 May 2011, 03:29 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
|
May I speculate that you don't look as closely and for as long as me? :p
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
10 May 2011, 04:19 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
Every 5512,5513,1680 and 1675 is different. No two have the same patina, bezel fade, dial, or tritium.
I could pick mine out of a pile at a distance.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
10 May 2011, 04:47 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
|
Yep, the spec of dust on the dial and uneven lume is unique to each one. :-)
|
10 May 2011, 04:52 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: EU
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 576
|
They all look the same.
I have even seen good fakes that look the same. Would probably not be a very good production line, if the all looked different. |
10 May 2011, 04:54 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
|
I put it down to owning more than one, and not noticing anymore. :p
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
10 May 2011, 04:57 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
|
Probably not.
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats |
10 May 2011, 01:52 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 3,764
|
I have worn my YM for 10+ years, so it has its share of scratches, particularly on the PCL, so I would know.
If it were brand new, not so much. I don't think there is anything unique about the case, face, hands, or bezel that I can detect. |
10 May 2011, 03:31 PM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
|
Quote:
Methinks some people here are being quite romantic about their watches. We should have a get-together and do a "blind" test to determine if one could indeed pick one out from the other.
__________________
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.