|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Sub C or GMT II Ceramic? Which do you prefer? | |||
| GMT II C |
   
|
482 | 51.83% |
| Sub C |
  
|
448 | 48.17% |
| Voters: 930. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
25 September 2014, 09:32 AM
|
#121 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 37
|
I have both now.. now I can die in peace.. jk
late bday present for myself. |
|
|
|
17 October 2014, 08:18 AM
|
#122 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 116610LV HULK
Posts: 637
|
This is a tough call, but if you are going to have a date, it should be the GMT. Subs should be no date.
|
|
|
|
|
19 October 2014, 09:40 AM
|
#123 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Me & Papa
Location: Echo
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 3,428
|
GMT II Ceramic because of its looks and functionality
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
