The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 October 2008, 05:02 AM   #1
Marrk
"TRF" Member
 
Marrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,192
Does Calibre Matter?

Every time I see the lovely Expy I, I am reminded of how much I would like to own one. However, I hesitate to buy an Expy I because it has the same calibre movement as my 14060m No-Date Sub, and it seems redundant to buy a watch just to have a different case and dial.

Does anybody else feel this hesitation? One could think of the Expy II w/ cal. 3186 vs. the GMT II w/ cal. 3186 as another example of this question. And I suppose someone will chime in with the Air King having a cal. 3130.

Your thoughts, colleagues?



Marrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2008, 05:12 AM   #2
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,399
I don't see it as a problem at all, I have numerous watches with the same movement. The OP Date, Sub Date, SD, DSSD DJ & YM all share the same cal. 3135. I would not have an issue owning one of each of those!
~Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2008, 05:26 AM   #3
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
I don't think the calibre matters. The calibre does not determine the character of the watch - its the case, the style, the functions, the bracelet that sum up the watch. Many different Rolex models share the same calibre.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2008, 05:30 AM   #4
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
With a Rolex movement, the calibres are all superb - to me, however, size does matter!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2008, 05:31 AM   #5
Ivy League
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 448
Mark:

I think your choice in the Explorer is a good one. Irregardless of the movement inside, the Explorer is an excellent watch. I have the 3186 in my new GMT IIc, but I would love to purchase the Explorer if given the opportunity. Even though some may consider this to be a step backward in calibre, the Explorer is as amazing watch. If you like it.........BUY IT !
Ivy League is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2008, 05:32 AM   #6
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
With a Rolex movement, the calibres are all superb - to me, however, size does matter!!
How many years have been hearing that JJ!
~Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2008, 05:32 AM   #7
Marrk
"TRF" Member
 
Marrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,192
JJ, I had a feeling you were going to say that.






Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
With a Rolex movement, the calibres are all superb - to me, however, size does matter!!
Marrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2008, 05:35 AM   #8
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,040
Hmmm, interesting....

Kind of like buying a car though, isn't it...

Different sheetmetal that pleases the eye, wrapped around the same chassis and drivetrain...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2008, 05:37 AM   #9
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLS View Post
How many years have been hearing that JJ!
~Scott
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrk View Post
JJ, I had a feeling you were going to say that.



Get your minds out of the gutter, tossers......just the 40 mm size I was referring to!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2008, 06:57 AM   #10
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Personally it wouldn't bother me at all. While both may have the same movement the purpose and style of the watches are different. If the goal is to establish a broad collection of sports watches not much you can do about the movement.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.