The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 November 2018, 10:25 PM   #31
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by faimag View Post
This is a lovely ref and VC is right there at the top. But I prefer the first gen (49140) to be honest. I just can't get pass the uneven subdial sizes on the 49150. At least they could have put the uneven subdial at 6 o'clock. (kind of like in the Royal Eagle). The third gen fixed that, but then again I am no fan of the date at 4.5 o'clock. Which is why I prefer the first gen... But hey, you can't go wrong with either.
I actually prefer a more subtle date aperture at 4 to the unmissable 12, maybe apart from on the Dato. At 3 is ideal but date placement is not a bugbear of mine.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2018, 09:12 AM   #32
Roger Lococco
"TRF" Member
 
Roger Lococco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Roger Lococco
Location: Asia
Watch: 126719BLRO Pepsi
Posts: 2,851
My view ... the big date on this model is absolutely awesome. Perfect positioning and perfect execution, including the almost imperceptible offset of the two date discs.

The larger subdial is designed to provide greater legibility for what is the primary chrono feature. It does create an asymmetry to the dial, which some will love, some will be okay with, and others will dislike. For me, it helps add character to what is an all around cool timepiece.
__________________
116500 Daytona White Dial
126710BLNR GMT II
126719BLRO Blue Dial Pepsi GMT II
Roger Lococco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2018, 12:40 PM   #33
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Congrats!!!
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2018, 01:03 PM   #34
steeevvvooo
"TRF" Member
 
steeevvvooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London
Posts: 1,365
Thanks all. I appreciate that people have preferences and that is one of the things I love so much about watches. It’s the subtle differences that make a watch appeal. I love the slightly unbalanced dials but big date at the top. Love the titanium bezel which, along with the rubber strap and grey dial, “de-blings” what can otherwise be a more shiny eye catching watch.

Personally I felt the gen1 models looked a little dated (I am not a fan of the bracelet design) and while I considered the gen2 in white I’m bracelet the more low key model I bought just hit all the right notes. The gen3 is more sophisticated and classy I think but perhaps less versatile? I know they come with three straps which helps versatility but I feel the watchhead is much more formal on those. The in-house and open case back are definitely positives for the gen3 though.
__________________
Once you aquire your "grail"... then what?!
steeevvvooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.