The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 3 September 2017, 10:02 AM   #1
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,739
114060...my missing link?

Here is my current collection of Rolex divers with a pelagos in the mix. Now that I look at it, I feel I have a gap...and the only way to fill it is with a 114060. I'm not much for the cyclops even though I like the date function however.






Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
rushca01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 10:07 AM   #2
Tridor
"TRF" Member
 
Tridor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Ozone
Watch: DD, DJ, SubC Date
Posts: 1,666
You already have a 14060. I think an 114060 would be redundant, notwithstanding the Cerachrome bezel and Glidelock.
Tridor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 10:09 AM   #3
Emoney11
"TRF" Member
 
Emoney11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 143
I also think 114060 would be redundant. Maybe a lvc?
__________________
Rolex 116710blnr
Rolex 126660 dblue
Rolex 1665
Omega Planet Ocean 8900 43.5
Breitling Superocean 44
Emoney11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 10:23 AM   #4
machob55
"TRF" Member
 
machob55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: US
Posts: 1,119
I agree a "Hulk" would balance out your collection!

Sent from my R1 HD using Tapatalk
machob55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 10:25 AM   #5
machob55
"TRF" Member
 
machob55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: US
Posts: 1,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by rushca01 View Post
Here is my current collection of Rolex divers with a pelagos in the mix. Now that I look at it, I feel I have a gap...and the only way to fill it is with a 114060. I'm not much for the cyclops even though I like the date function however.






Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Wow that looks amazing on that E. strap!

Sent from my R1 HD using Tapatalk
machob55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 11:08 AM   #6
Joemck
"TRF" Member
 
Joemck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Boston
Watch: And listen
Posts: 689
How about dssd w/ blue dial?
Joemck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 11:08 AM   #7
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
Go for the 114060 and don't look back.

watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 11:11 AM   #8
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joemck View Post
How about dssd w/ blue dial?
I love love this watch, but it's just too big for me. I want it to work so bad.
rushca01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 11:14 AM   #9
Beowulf
"TRF" Member
 
Beowulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: European Union
Posts: 244
Sell the 14060, get the 114060.
Better bracelet w/solid links, ceramic bezel, better clasp+Glidelock.
Beowulf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 11:18 AM   #10
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
I'd get the 114060 without hesitation.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 11:35 AM   #11
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,739
Icon7

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beowulf View Post
Sell the 14060, get the 114060.
Better bracelet w/solid links, ceramic bezel, better clasp+Glidelock.
14060M is highly sought after especially in the condition mine is in with the full set. Plus it was my Dads
rushca01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2017, 05:10 AM   #12
Gimoozaabi
"TRF" Member
 
Gimoozaabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by rushca01 View Post
14060M is highly sought after especially in the condition mine is in with the full set. Plus it was my Dads
Don't sell anything, both are icons that I think you should hold on to. The 114060 will be redundant as you already have its 5-digit predecessor (the two liner is much cleaner and elegant in my opinion).

I think you are missing some colour, add a 16610LV (Hulk) or get more variety with 16710 with a collection of besel inserts.
Gimoozaabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2017, 05:36 AM   #13
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,478
Honestly, I don't really think you have a "gap" per se...if you want another diver I would take a look at the new SD43. Gives you a size you don't have in your collection with a totally different feel with the wider bracelet. Just my thought.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2017, 05:46 AM   #14
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,739
I'm tempted to get the "hulk"..
rushca01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2017, 12:06 AM   #15
dr35mm
"TRF" Member
 
dr35mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
Since you don't like cyclops, have some great pieces and won't have issues with usability (you can rotate), I would look around for a 5513. The 114060 will be around for many years to come and its fairly easy to get, now the 5513 is the classic Sub, they are not so easy to find clean examples and I think it would compliment you collection better than a 114060 (which is pretty close to perfection Imo). Just look around.
__________________


Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80

Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270
dr35mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2017, 12:35 AM   #16
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
The 114060 is a great piece for many. If you like it on your wrist then it's a good choice. It's your call alone. For me it was ungainly; I much prefer the 14060.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 September 2017, 02:41 AM   #17
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,739
I thought I had found a good deal on a Hulk but it was sold..

I'm really liking the 16710..I was looking hard at these this past winter. The recent price hike has kept me at bay though.
rushca01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.