The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 August 2019, 03:46 AM   #31
Cryten
2020 HARRODS SGE Pledge Member
 
Cryten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Terrafirma
Posts: 2,527
47mm all the way.

A slightly early congrats on the new watch
Cryten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2019, 04:00 AM   #32
Bucky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 466
Have not pulled the trigger yet. Also need to see what discount they will offer me. Am hoping for 10%
Bucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2019, 04:52 AM   #33
synequano
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 413
389 fits you well,683 looks a bit small on mirror shot,a Panerai is supposed to look big on the wrist
synequano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2019, 06:28 AM   #34
mg18
"TRF" Member
 
mg18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Toronto
Watch: SubC 116610LN
Posts: 131
After seeing these shots, I'm now in the camp that would pull the trigger on the 47mm. They are both very workable IMO, but at their worst, the 47mm might be a tad on the large size, whereas the 42mm is a bit on the small side. Both look fine to me, but with more of the submersible DNA apparent in the 47mm i'd definitely go with that if I were you and if it were between the 2.

Enjoy!
mg18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2019, 08:01 AM   #35
lowmandfl
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 367
Both look good, but I say try the 47mm. If you needed to flip or trade, you'll get better value for the 1389 for sure.

Truthfully, I think you're leaning to the 47mm, so go with your gut, you'll love it! Panerai are big watches, but that's why people like them so rock it and enjoy the size.
lowmandfl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2019, 09:06 PM   #36
1William
2020 HARRODS SGE Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 27,220
The 47 mm watch works well for you and the new pictures should confirm that. I would push for a better discount than 10% but that may not be possible. Look on Chrono24 for some pricing on both new and pre-owned and see where you should be. Pickup the phone and call a few of these sellers and see what you can do. It has worked for me in the past and I typically save enough money for the trouble. Keep us posted.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2019, 09:52 PM   #37
Bucky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1William View Post
The 47 mm watch works well for you and the new pictures should confirm that. I would push for a better discount than 10% but that may not be possible. Look on Chrono24 for some pricing on both new and pre-owned and see where you should be. Pickup the phone and call a few of these sellers and see what you can do. It has worked for me in the past and I typically save enough money for the trouble. Keep us posted.
I am wanting to buy it from an AD as my name is registered for a Pepsi and a Batman (on Jubilee) at the same store so having purchase history will help. Only problem with this is how much discount can be had from the store instead of getting it on the grey market.
Bucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2019, 02:19 AM   #38
FWK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 136
You had just the same experience as me and as I described above.

When compared directly the 42 just looks off and like a kids watch. “Baby-Panerai”. I asked the sales assistant if they primarily sold the 42mm Sub to women and she said that the last two Subs she sold to women actually had been 47mm.

You are making the right choice. I pulled the trigger on a new 1389 too and I’m also waiting for my dealer to get it in September.

Already ordered the green, blue and orange rubber straps.
FWK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2019, 04:58 AM   #39
Bucky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by FWK View Post
You had just the same experience as me and as I described above.

When compared directly the 42 just looks off and like a kids watch. ďBaby-PaneraiĒ. I asked the sales assistant if they primarily sold the 42mm Sub to women and she said that the last two Subs she sold to women actually had been 47mm.

You are making the right choice. I pulled the trigger on a new 1389 too and Iím also waiting for my dealer to get it in September.

Already ordered the green, blue and orange rubber straps.
Were you able to negotiate a discount on the price?
Bucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2019, 06:58 AM   #40
FWK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 136
The AD here could “only” do 7% and a strap. Actually kind of fair.

I know another guy, but in Germany, that just bought his 1389 with 7,5% off.

I ended up going through a grey market dealer I’ve dealt with before.
FWK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2019, 10:59 AM   #41
Gotemandrew
"TRF" Member
 
Gotemandrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Usa
Posts: 34
I think the 683 looks really good.
Gotemandrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2019, 01:21 PM   #42
FWK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gotemandrew View Post
I think the 683 looks really good.
It does! - After all itís based on the 1389. But once you get them side by side it just fades a bit compared to itís big brother in the original size, design and with in-house move and Amagnetic TI case.
FWK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2019, 06:31 AM   #43
jag32
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: DC
Watch: PP/AP/BP/UN
Posts: 1,017
Definitely the 47!
jag32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2019, 07:58 AM   #44
Bucky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 466
They had to get me the new dial as the one I tried was the older dial. I was going on holiday for a few weeks so will go back in September hopefully manage to negotiate a discount of some sort and a few straps thrown in for the 1389 47mm
Bucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 12:52 PM   #45
Kh114060
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: City of Angels
Watch: $500 Tourbillon
Posts: 105
683 allll dayyy
Kh114060 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 01:12 PM   #46
Easydeals
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Singapore
Watch: Pam995
Posts: 35
1389 47mm looks better on you. Congrats.
Easydeals is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 01:16 PM   #47
fmoore5667
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: Peter Lyden
Location: Alabama
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 19
The 42mm looks Great due to size-wise
fmoore5667 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 04:37 PM   #48
Rashid.bk
2020 Pledge Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: N/A
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 9,671
iI think the op decided already, this was summer of last year.
Couple of these comparison came up before. I decide I like the look of traditional dot hour markers versus the sticks on the 1389. It seems more in line with what a Submersible dial should be.
But I prefer the 1305
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 09:36 PM   #49
Bucky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 466
Actually have not pulled the trigger on it yet. The 1389 I tried on was the older dial so waited for the AD to get the new dial in. I tried it on again two weeks ago as for some reason they found it hard to get one in. I love 1389 but am also waiting for a call for the new Rolex BLNR. Ultimately funds only allow to buy one at a time. Am deciding now if it is better to wait for the hard to get Rolex and then add the 1389 after. I told the dealer that I want both but it has to be Rolex first so am now waiting.
Th AD also only offered a 3% discount on the Panerai when in the grey market I have seen the 1389 new for around £2k+ cheaper.
Bucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 10:45 PM   #50
Yaz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: GVA
Watch: Rolex 16710
Posts: 813
PAM 683 on your wrist !
All day, every day !

47mm looks weird IMHO, but once again, it is all about taste, feeling...and emotions !
Yaz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2020, 11:58 PM   #51
Bucky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yaz View Post
PAM 683 on your wrist !
All day, every day !

47mm looks weird IMHO, but once again, it is all about taste, feeling...and emotions !
Out of the 683 and the 1389 I like the size of the 47mm 1389 much more. The 683 felt too small. If you see it on just a wrist shot it looks fine and the 47mm looks massive but when you see it as a full body shot the 47mm is big but looks better then the small 42mm.
Bucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2020, 10:51 PM   #52
sp006
2020 Pledge Member
 
sp006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: New York
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
Out of the 683 and the 1389 I like the size of the 47mm 1389 much more. The 683 felt too small. If you see it on just a wrist shot it looks fine and the 47mm looks massive but when you see it as a full body shot the 47mm is big but looks better then the small 42mm.


How big is your wrist?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
sp006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2020, 03:03 PM   #53
Ben07
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Borneo
Watch: GMT Master ii
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
This is why I thought I would ask. Mirror shot the 1389 looks good but wrist shot it looks massive. 683 looks small on the mirror shot but good on the wrist shot. Why didnít Panerai make this as a 44mm😔😔
My thoughts exactly. i like ceramic bezel Submersible but but not at 47mm. As i have a plethora of straps for my 44mm Luminors GMT, a sub at 44mm would be a welcome.
Ben07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2020, 09:41 AM   #54
MidwesttoPDX
2020 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 31
1389 For me!
MidwesttoPDX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2020, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.