The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 May 2018, 01:01 AM   #1
SubMarine
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Douglas
Location: London, UK & USA
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 723
Are older Rolex models also considered to be constructed with "Oyster Steel?"

For instance, is this the correct way to refer to 5-digit SS models, now?
SubMarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 01:02 AM   #2
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
"Oyster steel"?
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 01:03 AM   #3
pickettt
"TRF" Member
 
pickettt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Watch: Shiny One
Posts: 5,364
Same stuff, new name.
pickettt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 01:17 AM   #4
SubMarine
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Douglas
Location: London, UK & USA
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 723
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickettt View Post
Same stuff, new name.
Right, but is it correct to refer to all older SS models as "Oyster Steel" models?
SubMarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 01:24 AM   #5
c41006
"TRF" Member
 
c41006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubMarine View Post
Right, but is it correct to refer to all older SS models as "Oyster Steel" models?


I guess you could as long as they are made with 904L. I’m a bit curious as to why it matters though.
c41006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 01:30 AM   #6
pickettt
"TRF" Member
 
pickettt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Watch: Shiny One
Posts: 5,364
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubMarine View Post
Right, but is it correct to refer to all older SS models as "Oyster Steel" models?
I would say it's no more incorrect than calling them "SS", as opposed to "904L". I guess my point is, it's a name given to the steel, not to the watch. An old man in the grocery store once asked me where to find the "oleo", I would've been an ass if I'd corrected him and told him that it's called "margarine."
pickettt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 01:30 AM   #7
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubMarine View Post
Right, but is it correct to refer to all older SS models as "Oyster Steel" models?
I just refer to them by their model numbers. The details follow that.
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 01:37 AM   #8
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubMarine View Post
For instance, is this the correct way to refer to 5-digit SS models, now?
No such thing as oyster steel but 904L SS was introduced with watches like the 168000 Sub in 1987, 904L was generalised between 1988 and 1990 on most all other models.Before these dates they used mainly 316L SS which most all of the other Swiss industry still use today.There is nothing magical about the change to 904L the main difference between 316L over 904L it has slightly more Molybdenum(Mo)approx 2% more, approx 1-2% more Crome(Cr), 1% copper(Cu) and approx 10% more nickel and thats it.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 01:46 AM   #9
eyeheartny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
No such thing as oyster steel but 904L SS was introduced with watches like the 168000 Sub in 1987, 904L was generalised between 1988 and 1990 on most all other models.Before these dates they used mainly 316L SS which most all of the other Swiss industry still use today.There is nothing magical about the change to 904L the main difference between 316L over 904L it has slightly more Molybdenum(Mo)approx 2% more, approx 1-2% more Crome(Cr), 1% copper(Cu) and approx 10% more nickel and thats it.
904L looks different. Small changes in steel alloys do change the way light reflects off of them. If you don't believe that little differences in alloys make a difference, try a kitchen knife with 316 vs a supersteel like S35VN or ELMAX and tell me that small % differences don't radically change a steel's character/performance.
eyeheartny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 02:20 AM   #10
Fleetlord
"TRF" Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,910
904L is the ultimate
Fleetlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 04:04 AM   #11
mrblue
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 156
Rolex calls it oystersteel so it matters to them.
mrblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 04:07 AM   #12
dmash
"TRF" Member
 
dmash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 5,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrblue View Post
Rolex calls it oystersteel, as it's a marketing gimmick, which works upon a fair amount of individuals.
ftfy
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 04:25 AM   #13
Marcus09
"TRF" Member
 
Marcus09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Batman
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 1,184
Same 904L Steel. They just thought that "oyster Steel" is cooler.



Sent from my iPhone X using Tapatalk
__________________
Marcus09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 05:21 AM   #14
jimcameron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
904L is the ultimate
905L is coming out next year, then 904L will be referred to as "pot metal"
jimcameron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 05:41 AM   #15
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
No such thing as oyster steel but 904L SS was introduced with watches like the 168000 Sub in 1987, 904L was generalised between 1988 and 1990 on most all other models.Before these dates they used mainly 316L SS which most all of the other Swiss industry still use today.There is nothing magical about the change to 904L the main difference between 316L over 904L it has slightly more Molybdenum(Mo)approx 2% more, approx 1-2% more Crome(Cr), 1% copper(Cu) and approx 10% more nickel and thats it.


Peter
I have an alternative view. Rolex has now sourced a proprietary alloy of 904L. They aren’t revealing (thus far) what makes it different - but in the materials webpage, this explanation appears:




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 05:47 AM   #16
Marcus09
"TRF" Member
 
Marcus09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Batman
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 1,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimcameron View Post
905L is coming out next year, then 904L will be referred to as "pot metal"


Really? Rolex ? How come and where did you hear that?


Sent from my iPhone X using Tapatalk
__________________
Marcus09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 07:38 AM   #17
Likestheshiny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
Quote:
I have an alternative view. Rolex has now sourced a proprietary alloy of 904L. They aren’t revealing (thus far) what makes it different - but in the materials webpage, this explanation appears
Nothing in the description says that Oystersteel 904L is different from the 904L Rolex was previously using.

If there were an improvement of any sort, Rolex would be telling us about it. That they're not is essentially a confirmation that this is just a simple rebranding.
Likestheshiny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 07:46 AM   #18
SeaAndSky
"TRF" Member
 
SeaAndSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wild Blue Yonder
Watch: 116710 LN
Posts: 1,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by Likestheshiny View Post
Nothing in the description says that Oystersteel 904L is different from the 904L Rolex was previously using.

If there were an improvement of any sort, Rolex would be telling us about it. That they're not is essentially a confirmation that this is just a simple rebranding.
Yep. They make improvements but there's no proof in that advertisement that they've changed anything but the name.

Aren't the five digits referred to as rusty steel?
SeaAndSky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 10:12 AM   #19
meganfox17
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T View Post
Peter
I have an alternative view. Rolex has now sourced a proprietary alloy of 904L. They aren’t revealing (thus far) what makes it different - but in the materials webpage, this explanation appears
I agree with 77T because now Rolex has announced to the whole world that Oystersteel is Rolex and trademark alone after realizing 904L isn't their exclusive material anymore, facing stiff competition from the other watchmaker brands. Anecdotal reports from a certain Chinese brand but perhaps more importantly from the Japanese are threatening to bust the myths behind the 904L SS. Say it isn't so but apparently behind the scenes, Seiko has been quietly (maybe sneakily too) taking jabs at Rolex by producing a few special edition watch casings made of 904L SS believe it or not.


* Seiko Prospex PADI (Not Peter the Moderator 🤦) S.E GMT 065 Kinetic GMT Diver
*Seiko Prospex PADI Diver S.E SRPA21Say...I wonder whether Peter has a couple of PADI watches....
meganfox17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2018, 10:42 AM   #20
eyeheartny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by meganfox17 View Post
I agree with 77T because now Rolex has announced to the whole world that Oystersteel is Rolex and trademark alone after realizing 904L isn't their exclusive material anymore, facing stiff competition from the other watchmaker brands.


A full 20 years after Rolex developed 904L...

Pretty sure that demonstrates the leg up they had and still have in engineering and metallurgy. What’s more outrageous is how little innovation other brands have in so many parts of watchmaking, materials science, metallurgy, and production methods.
eyeheartny is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.