ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: When did Rolex stop being tool watches? | |||
1970-1979 | 25 | 8.47% | |
1980-1989 | 23 | 7.80% | |
1990-1999 | 22 | 7.46% | |
2000-2009 | 54 | 18.31% | |
2010-present | 81 | 27.46% | |
Bah! Rolex is still making tool watches! | 90 | 30.51% | |
Voters: 295. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
20 April 2019, 11:43 PM | #31 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,238
|
|
20 April 2019, 11:43 PM | #32 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,053
|
You're speaking my language! Still keeps time to that same spec, which is 1 sec/month.
|
20 April 2019, 11:56 PM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,053
|
I can't view a watch as a "tool" if I know I can get another watch that performs the very same functions even better for a lot less money.
For me, whether something is a "tool watch" is determined more by the market than by the manufacturer. Mechanical watches stopped being "tool watches" and started being unnecessary fashion/jewelry/accessory items once quartz watches became cheaper, more accurate, and just as waterproof. |
21 April 2019, 12:00 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Montreal CAN
Posts: 454
|
|
21 April 2019, 12:07 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,527
|
How the buyers use them, jewelry, investment, display, safe queen, whatever...is out of their control. The modern Rolex, even the pretty ones, are suitable as a tool. Expensive, unnecessarily decorated and even at times overpriced tools yes but so what. If they don't float your boat buy something else.
|
21 April 2019, 03:27 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: NCR
Watch: Out for that tree!
Posts: 285
|
They are still tool watches from a functional POV. Whether they get used as tools depends on the end user but as prices have become out of reach for many, by-in-large, those who can afford these watches aren’t the rugged individuals that originally bought/used them as tools. For most, they’re just status symbols and the last form of universally acceptable male jewelry.
But it doesn’t change the fact that these watches are just as capable as they have always been, if not more. When Rolex changes the depth rating of their divers to 100m and markets them as the best mechanical divers will be the day that they’re no longer tools. The fact that there are better tools for a given job in the form of quartz, dive computers, cell phones, etc...is besides the point. There are innumerable examples of things we do day-to-day, like shaving with a razor, using a manual toothbrush, writing with a fountain pen, driving a manual car, etc...where there are “better” options. Doesn’t make any of those things any less of a tool.
__________________
"The body will never go where the mind has never been" Rolex SD 126600, Seiko Golden Tuna SBBN 040, PAM 579, JLC Master Compressor Diving Chrono GMT NS in Yellow, DSSD, Sinn U1000S, Doxa T-Graph, Doxa 750 Caribbean, PAM 190 "8-Days", PAM 162,TT DJ (Left to me by Dad) |
21 April 2019, 03:36 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,732
|
Transition from lug holes to non lug holes in references 16600, 16610, and 16710 was the beginning of the end of the “tool” watch in my opinion.
|
21 April 2019, 04:38 AM | #38 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 8,987
|
I consider my SD4k a tool watch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
21 April 2019, 04:42 AM | #39 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,066
|
Man, this tool stuff comes up almost as often as how much is this going to be worth threads.
|
21 April 2019, 04:57 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: bay area
Posts: 571
|
During late seventies early 1980s military and divers stopped needing them, computers and electronics far more capable and ubiquitous. Full phase out very much coincides with beginning of use of applied white gold surrounded lume.
|
21 April 2019, 04:59 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Paul
Location: Colorado
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,543
|
I really don’t understand a lot of the arguments here. Why wouldn’t any of the SS models still be considered tool watches? I mean they’re doing everything they did when they were considered tool watches -and arguably doing those things better. A lot of people say Tudor is now Rolex’s tool watch maker. I mean, why? Because one costs $3k instead of $8k? I don’t think a ceramic bezel suddenly invalidates a tool watch. I also don’t think necessity is a measure of a tool watch. My 216570? Definitely a tool watch.
|
21 April 2019, 05:02 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,958
|
Still capable of rugged use.
The only thing that has changed is the user.
__________________
|
21 April 2019, 05:05 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Paul
Location: Colorado
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,543
|
|
21 April 2019, 05:06 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: C Vo
Location: Georgia
Watch: 117610LN 116610LN
Posts: 1,011
|
When the GMT models got PCL.
|
21 April 2019, 05:12 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: bay area
Posts: 571
|
My argument is that it isn’t the best tool for the job anymore. Watches have rarely been a primary tool (other than stopwatches) as opposed to your weapon or camera or airplane or regulator or ice axe - so it stopped making sense when 10x less expensive and 10x more capable options became available. When rolex was 2 x more expensive for 1.1 x more capability I think it made sense. Today it’s highly capable and high value for money jewelry.
|
21 April 2019, 05:19 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,349
|
A silly question and discussion
If you use it for the intended purpose, it is a tool.
__________________
DSSD is the king of all Rolex |
21 April 2019, 05:24 AM | #47 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,122
|
2000-2009 however a argument could be made that a few modern watches still could be considered “tool watches”
__________________
✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron. |
21 April 2019, 05:29 AM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
|
Quote:
|
|
21 April 2019, 05:32 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wild Blue Yonder
Watch: 116710 LN
Posts: 1,613
|
Oh look, I just looked at my watch to see what time it is. Hmmm. Still a tool performing its job.
#thesecontinuingthreadsareridiculous |
21 April 2019, 06:47 AM | #50 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,171
|
|
21 April 2019, 07:29 AM | #51 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Midwest
Watch: 5513,1675,216570
Posts: 1,465
|
Quote:
Can you tell me what type of battery(ies) it uses and how long they last? Did you buy the watch new, what year? |
|
21 April 2019, 07:57 AM | #52 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Midwest
Watch: 5513,1675,216570
Posts: 1,465
|
Quote:
|
|
21 April 2019, 08:47 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: Mountains
Watch: ALS, AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 2,877
|
Some people are spending a larger chunk of their disposable income - or even going into debt - to buy a watch than in the past. Those people tend to be very nervous, protective, and concerned about value retention. Give them a $200 Seiko that may look just as nice, and suddenly that’s a “tool watch” or a “beater.”
The watches Rolex makes are every bit as functional, reliable and robust as they’ve ever been. More so, in fact. The tool watch or not debate has much more to do with the owners than the watches. |
21 April 2019, 11:39 AM | #54 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,174
|
Quote:
Well said! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
21 April 2019, 12:00 PM | #55 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 434
|
Quote:
This. Sure modern Rolex looks “flashier”, but it is also just as functionally capable (if not more so) as older models. IMO it’s the customer base that purchase a modern Rolex for the aesthetic and style first and the function a distant second. Just this morning I took my Ceramic Sub on my PADI certification dive. It handled like a champ. Earlier this evening I put on formal attire and took my wife to a nice dinner. It looked as good with a wet suite as it did with a dress shirt. That’s versatility. That’s modern Rolex. |
|
21 April 2019, 12:04 PM | #56 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: Mountains
Watch: ALS, AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 2,877
|
Quote:
Congrats on your OW cert. Great to see the Sub underwater. I've been on many dives with my 16600, 116619, and 16613. Great backup bottom timers. |
|
21 April 2019, 02:30 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,755
|
You could go back as far as when plexiglass was replaced with sapphire crystal. I think lugholes going was the tipping point though. Then the 'redesign the icons' madness started.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
21 April 2019, 03:24 PM | #58 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,053
|
Quote:
I really got into these watches about 10-12 years ago and bought several of them (cal 1511 and 1516) preowned, all with papers. Got lucky. Also picked up some of their siblings -- the cal 1510 with the blue aventurine glass dial in SS and YG. |
|
21 April 2019, 03:35 PM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
They are awesome looking. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
21 April 2019, 04:05 PM | #60 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: US
Posts: 103
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.