ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 July 2020, 11:19 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: Gatchaman
Posts: 1,873
|
Seth, you make some interesting points. I’ve recently let go of a few Rolex and got something else that sings to me. But I kept a few Rolex that mean something to me. I like watches. I like the ones I like. And if I can get them I get them. If I can’t then I move on to something else. My last 2 watch purchases have been Gshocks. That’s what I liked.
|
13 July 2020, 11:19 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: 36000FT
Posts: 701
|
I agree with your points Seth. ADs, the games they play with bundling, the interchangeable waitlists. I get it bottom line is money, its a business.
As a millennial, part of the issue is that Rolexs are seen are status symbols just as LV, and Gucci is, along with an Audi,BMW etc. It doesnt help also today in music every second song people are rapping about Rolexs, APs, Patek. Adds to they are just status symbol of how successful you are. I purchased my DJ, when I had a huge accomplishment in my life. Loved the design, the size, how looked on my wrist. I tried Omega Aqua Terra, speedmaster, breitling. Nothing compared how the DJ looked and felt. Rolex will always have it buyers who just buy the watches because they are expensive. For our small group on the forum we know they are more than a status symbol. Kind of rambling here, but I’d like to see Rolex fix the AD process, have a formal ordered system which doesnt rely on the AD good gracious to bless you with a watch or not. |
13 July 2020, 11:20 AM | #33 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NorCal
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 6,556
|
I love the Rolex history, brand and obviously their watches.
It's some of the people that own them that I can't stand. Nothing to do with the brand itself. How they conduct business might not appeal to most, but it's their business model and scarcity (whether people think it's intentionally driven by Rolex or not) is something that generally encompasses Veblen goods. I'll continue to buy as long as I find them interesting.
__________________
|
13 July 2020, 11:27 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: WG BLRO, Sub C, WG
Posts: 1,565
|
I totally get the frustration. But does most of it stem from not being able to get what you want from an AD?
Perhaps the watches aren’t the issue, it’s really the AD games we don’t like. If we all knew that we could go on a list and wait 2 months or 6 months we would be ok with that. Being fobbed off or pushed into bundling etc creates an undesirable feeling. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
13 July 2020, 11:30 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,579
|
Hey Seth,
It's all good on my side and I get it. I like my Rolex's but I also dig my IWC, Omega, AP and my very cool Vacheron. At the end of the day I've always said it, it's only a watch and there are much more things more important. Hang strong, Tim |
13 July 2020, 11:32 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Socal/LA
Watch: 116610LN Ceramic
Posts: 3,214
|
"Recently an article came out praising Rolex for giving us an early Xmas present by showing the world their latest designs. The watches that won’t be out for months and will only go to the very very few anyway. Unless you are willing to pay market value, which I am. Just not for Rolex. At least not today I’m not."
What latest designs??
__________________
♛ Sub 116610LN 2011 ♛ GMT 126710BLNR 2021 ♛ GMT 126711CHNR 2020 ♛ Datejust 16233 X-series 1993 Ω Speedmaster Mitsukoshi 2019 č Cartier Tank w5200025 2021 |
13 July 2020, 11:33 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 116618LB
Posts: 221
|
I agree with most of your points but I don't agree that Rolex has jumped the shark. I'm not quite at the point of hating Rolex's shenanigans and I'm pretty sure there's little they could do to dissuade me from wearing their references. I really enjoy the pieces in my collection.
AND... Hit 'em with the Hein! |
13 July 2020, 11:37 AM | #38 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,550
|
I understand the sentiment and feel the same way sometimes.
That said, I keep coming back to crown, even tough there are so many great brands out there to experiment with. |
13 July 2020, 11:39 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: California
Watch: SD50, PAM-690
Posts: 356
|
Why would we feel hurt that YOU don't want to wear a Rolex? Thoroughly enjoy wearing mine and my Panerai. Seems you don't want to be seen with a Rolex. Sell what you have and enjoy your others. Ciao
|
13 July 2020, 11:40 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Watch: 116618LB
Posts: 573
|
You bring up some good points. I agree with some of it. People wearing Rolex as strictly a status symbol is nothing new. I would argue that with the increase in popularity of AP and PP with celebrities that Rolex has lost a little bit of that in recent years.
|
13 July 2020, 11:43 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/AP
Posts: 341
|
Rolex has long attracted status seeking folks. But objectively speaking they make the best watches and have the most timeless designs.
I don’t really care what others think, and enjoy mine under my cuff or at home with the family most of time, as do many enthusiasts. Enjoy the Rolex, don’t over think it. |
13 July 2020, 11:44 AM | #42 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Anonymous
Location: location location
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 2,282
|
|
13 July 2020, 11:47 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,120
|
Completely understand OP. However, pls note that part of the recent (last 3-4 years) Rolex super hype is due to the fact that they are hard to get. It becomes a psychology of wanting something you cannot have. We make relationships, we play the games, we beg dealers for the hot items, and sit by the phone for that special call to give them our thousands of dollars.
If tomorrow Rolex somehow provides us all the watches we all want and produces 5 million a year, I am sure we would all move to another more exclusive brand. Part of the allure owning a new Rolex Pepsi steel or Daytona C is because it is a super watch, keeps value (due to the demand and lack of inventory), hard to get, and “exclusive”. It has become super hard to get those watches. I am now on year two of waiting for a SkyDweller. But, I am not losing sleep over it. I have looked around for other great options and somewhat glad that has happened. I am very excited about getting into independents, FP Journe, Akrivia, Atelier de Chronometre, and others. In fact, I also looking at VC and Omega. Just love watches! I personally don’t let that Rolex game get to me. It is what it is and just roll with it. Explore other options. It is part of the fun. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
13 July 2020, 11:48 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 208
|
|
13 July 2020, 11:50 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Earth
Watch: 16600, 126600, 126
Posts: 298
|
Great post!
Rolex watches are indeed special. At one point in time, I thought I would only collect Omega watches - I wasn't going to be that "Rolex" guy. Long story short I ended up with two Bond seamasters, a speedmaster and an explorer 2. I tried so hard to reject the Rolex in favor of the Omega's, but failed miserably. Out of all the watches, the Rolex was the most satisfying to wear - and it hurt to admit it. Even at work, I would wear my Omega's regularly and no one would pay attention, as soon as I put on the Rolex some colleagues heads would move along with my hand gestures; clearly it had something that set it apart. I have a love/hate relationship with Rolex, but what's the alternative to the current scarcity? What if all the watches were readily available at AD's and on the secondary market for less than retail? Would we be even even more turned off? I've decided to wear my Timex Ironman to work from now on, I've realized the stigma of wearing a Rolex cannot always be overcome with common sense. I have colleagues that own 10's of 1000's of dollars worth of guns, cars, hunting gear etc. but would antagonize someone for wearing a Rolex watch, or a $100 pair of jeans. It sickens me to think I could wear a $900,000.00 RM53-01 to work without hearing a peep, but a $5000.00 datejust could cause all kinds of gossip. |
13 July 2020, 11:51 AM | #46 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Matt
Location: .
Watch: PAM111
Posts: 2,622
|
“Jumping the shark“ comes from when the Fonz, er, jumped a shark, signalling Happy Days’ increasingly desperate measures to keep viewers hooked. Perhaps this is how some fans of older Rolex feel about the company’s current strategies. I don’t. But I think the usage here holds as a matter of opinion.
Regarding Chewbacca’s above post, wish I felt like a tripod. |
13 July 2020, 11:53 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Earth
Watch: 16600, 126600, 126
Posts: 298
|
Same here, sometimes it's just easier to slip on my Timex.
|
13 July 2020, 11:56 AM | #48 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,693
|
Meh, I like the Rolex watch but I also like other watches in my collection just as much. 30 years of Rolex ownership, I need other designs outside of Rolex to excite my collection. Most Rolex models have that universal “Rolex Look” to the outside world. To be perfectly honest, I would get bored with a collection full of Rolex models alone.
As for dealer arrogance on who gets what models and when is laughable to me. I look at the Rolex dealer network and current attitudes like a McDonalds manager choosing who gets to buy the next BigMac. I’ll pay up to buy steak when I want it. |
13 July 2020, 11:58 AM | #49 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
5DD70CFA-DCDF-45D2-AE8F-081E468AB785.jpeg |
|
13 July 2020, 12:00 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 307
|
Rolex attitude towards clientele is a big turn off to me also. They are one of few brands of any kind that likes to play this game.
That said, I like the looks / size / proportions of Rolex SS watches best, compared to other brands in similar price points. I have a small wrist, so most of Omega's / GS watches won't fit. For $10-15k, Rolex really is the best deal, with combination of resell, looks, sizing, history, function, etc. And Hublot and Breitling being cool? I guess it's all subjective, but to me, Hublot watches are ugly as hell. Where I disagree with the spirit of the OP's post is being frustrated with the brand due to people acting hot and arrogant just because they have a Rolex watch on. For this type of crowd, it's not the Rolex that's the problem. It's them. Also, I don't buy into the notion that Rolex watch screams success. All it tells me is you have an expensive taste, and you enjoy wearing finer things to the extent that you dropped $10-20k on a timepiece. Now, if I see a guy with a $3-4M portfolio in mid 30's making mid to high six figure salary, yea I will be impressed at the guy's accomplishments, smarts, and drive. |
13 July 2020, 12:03 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
|
I get it, but I still like the brand. Rolex does innovate, i.e, new movements, albeit slowly, and I like that they are slow to change their models. Longevity of design is important to me, and I think it is why many appreciate their watches - a Sub today is remarkably similar to a Sub from 30 years ago. I too find their availability tiresome as well some of the more recent converts who seem to like Rolex for all the wrong reasons. Fortunately, there are other great manufacturers out there, in addition to Rolex, and I’ve been able to explore and enjoy some great watches from IWC, Cartier and Omega given Rolex’s availability issues.
|
13 July 2020, 12:11 PM | #52 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: 36000FT
Posts: 701
|
Quote:
|
|
13 July 2020, 12:18 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,158
|
I can't disagree with you here. From my own perspective I'm glad I hustled up (bought, sold and traded) for a few years and put together what I have in my Rolex collection, my last two were both 5 dgt. pieces and for the first time in a long while I have no Rolex on my radar and have finally been enjoying other brands, some more and some less expensive, new and used ive come to appreciate many more, not just Rolex.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
13 July 2020, 12:18 PM | #54 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,693
|
We have always talked about the “Rolex baggage” for years before anyone ever waited in-line for a Rolex purchase. Some love it and others deal with it. Most enthusiast that hate it moved over to Omega. Funny thing is some new Rolex owners smugly think these Omega owners buy them because they couldn’t afford a Rolex.
|
13 July 2020, 12:18 PM | #55 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,113
|
Quote:
Damn son. |
|
13 July 2020, 12:55 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,695
|
Great post!
Yes. Lots of DBs turned on to Rolex due to Instagram etc. every other you tuber with a watch channel talks about Hulks, Batman and Pepsi. Ugh. Has a little luster come off the Rolex shine? A little bit in my eyes. I still love what I have, but I do tire of the retina burn of the same topics and seeing cases of modern Rolex hoarded by online sellers. So Taking breaks from TRF and other places is well worth doing...as well as exploring other brands. |
13 July 2020, 12:56 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,063
|
As a non-collector and someone who has never bought from an AD, all this scarcity and bad AD behavior hoopla doesn't effect me. My tastes run from a scant few Rolex models to a Casio G-Shock.
But I understand the connoisseur's frustration with Rolex and their apparent lack of interest in how their customers are treated. On a purely "make the sale" basis they're hitting it out of the park. Rolex sells everything they produce and have folks lining up for whatever comes next. I don't know if their lack of engagement with their customer base will alter buying habits of collectors. I'm thinking probably not. So many people were saying just a year ago that the age of the smart watch was the end of Rolex. But it looks like folks are buying smart watches AND mechanical watches, not replacing one with the other. I see douchebags wearing gold President DDs all the time, the kind of person that has no clue what he's wearing or is wearing it only because it is expensive. Hell, I worked with a lot of them. While it tarnished the brand for me for a long time, when I got my 16710 it was for me. And I really don't care what other people wear or what they think of what I wear. I say the hell with the douchebags. And the hell with Rolex ADs. If I decide to get my second Rolex watch my first (and second) call will be to somebody like @SohAIS, a trusted seller with whom I've done business already. It will probably be an SD4K or an Explorer II. He's honest and open, he has what I want, and there are no games. Refreshing.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono |
13 July 2020, 01:13 PM | #58 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Good Hope
Watch: 124060
Posts: 1,596
|
Quote:
|
|
13 July 2020, 01:19 PM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR/116500LN/APRO
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
__________________
Current Collection, in order of wrist time Rolex326934/IWC500705/Rolex116710BLNR/Rolex116500LN/AP15400ST Wife: Rolex178274/BreitlingB13050 (My Father's) |
|
13 July 2020, 02:04 PM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/Tokyo
Watch: FPJ CO BL
Posts: 1,598
|
I don't necessarily disagree with most of the OPs points. But at the end of the day, when you look around at the $6k-$15K range of watches, which lets be honest is still quite a high amount for most "normal" folks, Rolex just does so many things really really well.
- Quality: They make so many watches but the reliability, durability, and consistency of production is just very very high. Not something to scoff at. Whether its machine made or whatever, its impressive. - Customer service: I think there needs to be a distinction between how "ROLEX" is treating its customers and what "ADs" are doing. I can honestly say that my best "customer experience" with any watch brand is Rolex. You got an issue? You take it to a Rolex Service Centre, Ive used both the one in London and one in Tokyo. Both absolutely beautiful buildings, very attentive staff, very organised and any Rolex I service, came back perfect and great. Its just great I can walk in and actually talk to a watchmaker that services the watches too. Really good afterservice. Consistency of Design: Now people can argue that this is either LACKING in innovation or being very confident and consistent but I feel that its important to protect your design language and Rolex does this so well. Look at other brands like Vacheron, Omega, they keep changing what a seamaster or Overseas looks like every season. That can be considered innovative sure, but I prefer that designs remain classic with small tweaks. Its amazing that a watch that was released 20 years ago can be just as sought after and valuable as one that is produced today. Innovation: Sure, they are no Geurbel Forsey, or FP Journe etc They are not in the market of making cutting edge high complication watches. But doesnt mean they dont innovate. Look at how interesting the Skydweller is! An annual calendar that is so simple to use with no pushers and using the bezel. Imagine how many patents went into that!
__________________
F.P.Journe Chronometre Optimum Black Label, Patek 5811G-001, A. Lange & Söhne Lange 1 191.039, Patek 5167A-001, Rolex Yacht-Master 40 Everrose, (Wh) Rolex Daytona 116500, (Blue) Rolex Skydweller 326934, Rolex Submariner 126610LV IG: tokyo_watch_guy |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.