Patek sky moon

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

I'm starting to get a little confused now.


Since the subject is bound to generate further controversy of the existence/non existence of the said watch (in the member's possession at least) I suggest one of the following:

1. Post some lovely wristshots so that we can all bask in the beauty of this ultimate timepiece.

2. Never, ever mention the watch again, just to keep the damn peace.

I must say that if I were brave enough to own this piece there'd be pictures abound.

Have to agree with you, Paul. I don't see all the mystery behind this watch.

Okay, it's a very rare and priceless watch.......but, hell, I always say......if you've got it, flaunt it!!

JJ

[flyinbrian]

The one I found on google which sold through a reputable seller was a 2001?

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by Numismatist

Maybe he bought a fake?

Impossible - nobody, but nobody, can be that stupid enough to hand over such a large sum of money without doing some homework first.

JJ

[Safetrends]

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Thanks for the info, Bruno......now this whole episode gets more and more mysterious by the minute!!

JJ maybe you and him could do a watch exchange do you have one of those expensive watches lying about in you house next to the sheep?

[unknown]

Originally Posted by flyinbrian

The one I found on google which sold through a reputable seller was a 2001?

Could be a typo or was it via Antiquorum ? If it was Antiquorum, I've seen more mistakes :-)


click this link
http://www.patek.com/patek-philippe....dId=2&lang=en&
Browse the timeline ans click on 2002
than read the sentence on the bottom of your screen

[flyinbrian]

Originally Posted by unknown

Could be a typo or was it via Antiquorum ? If it was Antiquorum, I've seen more mistakes :-)


click this link
http://www.patek.com/patek-philippe....dId=2&lang=en&
Browse the timeline ans click on 2002
than read the sentence on the bottom of your screen

No it was Gil The watch collector who I have seen selling on many forums.

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by unknown

Could be a typo or was it via Antiquorum ? If it was Antiquorum, I've seen more mistakes :-)


click this link
http://www.patek.com/patek-philippe....dId=2&lang=en&
Browse the timeline ans click on 2002
than read the sentence on the bottom of your screen

Guys,

I've known Bruno (unknown) a long time now, and rest assured he really knows his stuff.

JJ

[kyle L]

I'm sorry, I would really love to see the watch! But until you actually show us the pictures, it just seems like your are just pulling our strings Sean.

[unknown]

Originally Posted by flyinbrian

No it was Gil The watch collector who I have seen selling on many forums.

I know Gil, not in person but we've mailed before ;-)
Ik think Gil made a mistake with the date

[Safetrends]

This is getting really good I cant wait to find out about the ghost watch.

[kkwn98]

Originally Posted by deserted

There you go! my point exactly and with that being said under strong legal advice i will not be posting pictures of the piece.

It's a small world and i'm not taking that chance, after hearing some of the feedback on this i think it's in my best intrest not to.

So sorry to all i have spoken to my lawyer so believe what you want but i know the truth.

Take care and have a great day!

Er, a complete non sequitur there?

Originally Posted by unknown

guys, read the end of my post !

He claims he has a 1999 model and the first Skymoon was made in 2002 And I'm pretty sure the first pieces were only in gold, platinum started in (2003-2004 ?)

The price is about 900.000 euro this is 1.3 million USD

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

I'm starting to get a little confused now.


Since the subject is bound to generate further controversy of the existence/non existence of the said watch (in the member's possession at least) I suggest one of the following:

1. Post some lovely wristshots so that we can all bask in the beauty of this ultimate timepiece.

2. Never, ever mention the watch again, just to keep the damn peace.

I must say that if I were brave enough to own this piece there'd be pictures abound.

I'm afraid you didn't read deserted's post properly: the man is under legal advice not to show pictures of his 5002P. Sorry, make that "strong" legal advice. I'm sure that the "strong" legal advice will explain the 1999/2002 conundrum.

[Safetrends]

Originally Posted by kyle L

I'm sorry, I would really love to see the watch! But until you actually show us the pictures, it just seems like your are just pulling our strings Sean.

Kyle correction from strings to chain.

[kyle L]

Originally Posted by Safetrends

Kyle correction from strings to chain.

I don't think this thread is going to get anywhere.

[unknown]

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Guys,

I've known Bruno (unknown) a long time now, and rest assured he really knows his stuff.

JJ

Thanks JJ

But since a few of you are not convinced yet I did some research

Look at his profile and look at the watch he claims to have

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: fort wayne IN
Watch: Patek 1909003
Posts: 2,173

Now, look what you get via google if you search for Patek 1909003

Click the link and scroll down to the last second last watch ...

http://images.google.be/imgres?imgur...a%3DN%26um%3D1


If you don(t get it know, you'll never understand :-)

[sushisummo]

This thread is definetly entertaining.....

[kyle L]

Originally Posted by unknown

Thanks JJ

But since a few of you are not convinced yet I did some research

Look at his profile and look at the watch he claims to have

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: fort wayne IN
Watch: Patek 1909003
Posts: 2,173

Now, look what you get via google if you search for Patek 1909003

Click the link and scroll down to the last second last watch ...

http://images.google.be/imgres?imgur...a%3DN%26um%3D1


If you don(t get it know, you'll never understand :-)

And these are fake right?

[Safetrends]

Originally Posted by unknown

Thanks JJ

But since a few of you are not convinced yet I did some research

Look at his profile and look at the watch he claims to have

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: fort wayne IN
Watch: Patek 1909003
Posts: 2,173

Now, look what you get via google if you search for Patek 1909003

Click the link and scroll down to the last second last watch ...

http://images.google.be/imgres?imgur...a%3DN%26um%3D1


If you don(t get it know, you'll never understand :-)

Bruno,
JJ said you know you watches and I believe him. I am not a watch expert so I have to learn from you guys and I think this thread is great for identifying a problem with person who posted it if any.

[unknown]

Originally Posted by kyle L

And these are fake right?

they're even VERY bad fakes, look at the pics I posted and compare them

[kyle L]

Originally Posted by unknown

they're even VERY bad fakes, look at the pics I posted and compare them

You're right. Well we'll see what happens.

[kkwn98]

Originally Posted by deserted

Don't expect me to let your "Odius " attitude make me feel less, it's only because of a few trusted friends on the forum that i decieded to even post a borrowed pic and if that's if i even choose to do any wristshots of the piece you won't see it!

I'm really struggling to make sense of this...

Maybe one day I too will have enough trusted online and anonymous iFriends to post some stock scans of my watches. Under strong legal advice, I won't show you actual wrist shots, but you'll just have to trust me. I mean, I have to trust you enough even to show stock photos!

[Mosco]

Oh no....

[kkwn98]

Originally Posted by unknown

Thanks JJ

But since a few of you are not convinced yet I did some research

Look at his profile and look at the watch he claims to have

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: fort wayne IN
Watch: Patek 1909003
Posts: 2,173

Now, look what you get via google if you search for Patek 1909003

Click the link and scroll down to the last second last watch ...

http://images.google.be/imgres?imgur...a%3DN%26um%3D1


If you don(t get it know, you'll never understand :-)

Good detective work. I think I prefer the Million Smart Enterprises version...

IBL!

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by Mosco

Oh no....

Oh yes, Bruno's link has come up with some horrible fakes!!

[Mosco]

But... Sean... dammit, I like the guy!

[Safetrends]

I think the person who started this thread on the Patek Sky Moon should put up(the photo of the watch on his wrist for authentic reasons) or shut up and accept a humiliating defeat. Thier is a lot of sharks swimming in this thread and they are looking for the cream filling.

[deserted]

I have sat back and read each and every last post that has been put up on this thread and to tell you the truth i would not believe it either that's just human nature!

I'm going to explain why i would not post the pictures one last time and from here i'm going to leve well enough alone as paul said to keep the peace!


1) I'm not librety to give you information on this timepiece if i choose to do so it will not be on a open forum like this, we just had a guy get scammed here on TRF and after reading some of the post here i'm not to sure if someone may try to do harm to me with the economy being the way it is "please don't hold your breath"

2) it was my mistake to even put a post out here like this with me" being a newbie and all "suddenely your purchasing a watch of this magnitude dosen't sit well with someone who just lost thier job or home or someone who is on the brink of losing both.

Let's face it not to many pepole like myself are very well liked these days!
All that really matters is that i know i own one , and as i stated before i would not believe it either!

And under the advice of my consul i will not be posting pics of the piece.

To all that feel offended , confused and disarrayed i apoligize....

[JJ Irani]

This thread is going nowhere!!

[kkwn98]

Originally Posted by unknown

Man, I could be wrong but I don't believe it

People who buy the million dollar watches don't post them on forums like these, they are very discrete.

Besides you're only 5 months on this forum but you posted 2200 messages. The people who earn enough to buy these ultra complicated , their time is way to expensive and I can't imagine they have enough time to post 500 messages per month ! AND since the Sky moon tourbillon was imo first made in 2002 ... it will be difficult to own a 1999 model ;-)

Not to argue with you, as you're generally right, but as you will recall, "Ludwig" used to post on TZ, as did "Cookie". Also, some of the Singapore/Indonesia/Thailand contingent who (used to) post on Thomas's forum.

IBL!

[JohnEaton]

I must confess, it was I who sold the Patek to deserted AKA chilvary...

And now having confirmed that his funds have finally cleared, can report that indeed the timepiece is authentic, or at least that is what I was assured when I picked this fantastic timepiece up in a Nigerian market on my infamous worldwide Margarita tour in 2007.

[Safetrends]

Originally Posted by deserted

I have sat back and read each and every last post that has been put up on this thread and to tell you the truth i would not believe it either that's just human nature!

I'm going to explain why i would not post the pictures one last time and from here i'm going to leve well enough alone as paul said to keep the peace!


1) I'm not librety to give you information on this timepiece if i choose to do so it will not be on a open forum like this, we just had a guy get scammed here on TRF and after reading some of the post here i'm not to sure if someone may try to do harm to me with the economy being the way it is "please don't hold your breath"

2) it was my mistake to even put a post out here like this with me" being a newbie and all "suddenely your purchasing a watch of this magnitude dosen't sit well with someone who just lost thier job or home or someone who is on the brink of losing both.

Let's face it not to many pepole like myself are very well liked these days!
All that really matters is that i know i own one , and as i stated before i would not believe it either!

And under the advice of my consul i will not be posting pics of the piece.

To all that feel offended , confused and disarrayed i apoligize....

I do not get it first you were going to post pictures of this watch and now you are not. Something is not right. I am not going to post stock photos of a watch and say it mine that is for sure. I have the real thing a Rolex DateJust and Date which is not the cream of the crop but at least they are real.
I just do not get it?