Rolex v Omega

[DVDA]

I have both and for me I jump between the do based on type...

Ie Planet Ocean vs Sub/Sea Dweller I pick Planet Ocean
Broad Arrow vs Daytona, I pick Daytona.

And Moonwatch is just cool, in its own category.

[KZ1000]

I have a diverse collection of both brands. With the new Rolex business model, my choice to now concentrate more on Omega was an easy one. There are certain things I'll wait years for, not a watch. The latest Seamaster is awesome! They have really stepped up their game. Omega has such a rich history that I think is definitely underrated.

[Mystro]

I agree with this. My watches are a luxury lifestyle purchase. Luxury is about getting what I want when I want it. About the only thing I “wait” on in life is my wife getting ready. I certainly don’t wait to buy a watch nor would I ever play games with a dealer to make a retail purchase for a watch.

[anonymousmoose]

Originally Posted by Mystro

I agree with this. My watches are a luxury lifestyle purchase. Luxury is about getting what I want when I want it. About the only thing I “wait” on in life is my wife getting ready. I certainly don’t wait to buy a watch nor would I ever play games with a dealer to make a retail purchase for a watch.

Precisely. On the once or twice a decade occasion I can treat myself to a timepiece I really want, I can't have the task of buying it from a shop being a burden. I wasn't prepared to play the Rolex waiting game so bought this. Just as well built as any Rolex SS diver


The fact the Joe Blogs doesn't recognise it as a prestigious watch because he wasn't seen some rapper named after a coin wear it, that's ok what me.

[Toproll85]

There are pro Omega, pro Rolex. Both camps do not open minded.
I will even say, they are idiots.

Rolex still has the advantage, it must be said, to keep much better value...but in terms of product and quality, it's close.
We must recognize that there is good in each brand.

The ideal is to own both.

[0315]

There are multiple Rolex that I love and have. And than there is only one, Speedmaster

[Roll the Lex]

Rolex does the same thing and has slowly evolved to the point where they have perfected what a watch should be according to Rolex. There’s no flash, needless engineering, risk taking. You get a fabulous watch. Every little detail has been thought out. It may look simple but it has taken decades to perfect it.

Omega takes a more shotgun approach to the watch with all their limited editions. They are not afraid of trying new things compared to a Rolex.

Take a look at the planet ocean. 600m wr, can get it in titanium with a rubber insert in the bezel, clear caseback, and coaxial movement. Despite the lousy resale, it is a fantastic value if you don’t flip. It’s not perfect- it’s a bit thick, the divers extension comes undone too easily, but I appreciate the vastly different approach. Love my PO titanium.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BlueNote]

I own both. Currently I have 3 Omegas (AT Skyfall, SMPc and an 18k GMT DeVille. I’ll never sell the first two and all 3 run within +2, equal to Rolex standards. For Rolex I have a SD and a DJ, they’re not leaving my collection either.

Omega seems to experiment with dial designs more, not all of which appeal to me but at least they try to innovate. And Omega is developing some legit movement improvements.

Rolex sticks with classic enduring dial designs and slowly makes slight changes to improve upon their classicism. They introduce new movements infrequently but they set the standard for ruggedness and reliability.

I wear watches for myself. No one ever notices what watches I wear except perhaps my immediate family. Both brands have their merits but my next watch will be another Rolex.

[trippinjimmy]

Originally Posted by BlueNote

I wear watches for myself. No one ever notices what watches I wear except perhaps my immediate family. Both brands have their merits but my next watch will be another Rolex.

Just curious...to even out the numbers at 3 or for a different reason?

Is there a particular one you've got your eye on?

[AndyWright]

I have owned Omega in the past, very stylish with sleek designs. Both are excellent watches in their own right, but maybe thats because I love a good watch when I see it. I only own Rolex now, still No prejudice here.

[britabroad]

Revive an old thread.

So Omega has poor resale value compared to Rolex. Agreed

Also agree buy pre-owned for Omega otherwise you get hit really bad on the $.

However buy pre-owned and flip you then still get hit bad % but overall less $ loss.

[Arcticsub]

Originally Posted by britabroad

Revive an old thread.

So Omega has poor resale value compared to Rolex. Agreed

Also agree buy pre-owned for Omega otherwise you get hit really bad on the $.

However buy pre-owned and flip you then still get hit bad % but overall less $ loss.

That's only a half truth, seeing as speedmaster moonwatches have good resale value.

Also, Cellini. Also, Air-King and so on.

[scarlet knight]

Originally Posted by britabroad

Revive an old thread.

So Omega has poor resale value compared to Rolex. Agreed

Also agree buy pre-owned for Omega otherwise you get hit really bad on the $.

However buy pre-owned and flip you then still get hit bad % but overall less $ loss.

But I have sold many in my time. I am with the buy what you like school, regardless of status or resale value.

[Nerdywatch2]

Both watches are awesome thanks.

[jdw003]

I’ve been considering this topic recently since I just parted with the last Rolex in my case. I’ve purchased 6 Rolexes, sold 5 and gifted one. I’ve purchased 4 Omegas, gifted one and kept 3. The Omega ownership experience is decidedly different, for me anyway. My appreciation for Rolex is rooted in their brand strategy and manufacturing processes, the tolerances on every modern Rolex are unbelievable for the scale of production.
My appreciation for Omega is in the subtle and not so subtle details that separate the vast number of variants in each line. I was in a large AD the other day and the Omega case was so interesting. Omegas are more personal.

I’ll continue to buy Rolexes and undoubtedly continue to sell Rolexes. My Omegas will be there when the honeymoon ends.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[SemperFi]

I’ve also owned both brands and would put Rolex and Omega on equal footing.

[dnpina]

I read the thread.
Marketing works.


Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

[sl954]

I'm in the Omega camp, I dont own a rolex, but wuld like ot add one to my collection

[Nadi090]

The resale value of Rolex is higher than Omega but that doesn't necessarily mean Omega is mediocre to Rolex though...

[1William]

I have had a good experience with both brands once I got to the point that I appreciated them for what they are, not what they are not. I currently own two Omega's with my eye on the new James Bond Seamaster on the mesh bracelet. I own seven Rolex watches and am not really looking for additions.

[GsurgBM]

Both. Both make great watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[schoolboy]

Originally Posted by GsurgBM

Both. Both make great watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nice shot!

[schoolboy]

Originally Posted by GsurgBM

Both. Both make great watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How do watches compare as far as wearing them goes?

Which one wears bigger?

Which one is more comfortable?

[trippinjimmy]

Originally Posted by schoolboy

How do watches compare as far as wearing them goes?

Which one wears bigger?

Which one is more comfortable?

I'm sure others will weigh in, but I have both so I'll start...honestly I'd say they wear similarly.

The sub on its bracelet is more comfortable, but I'd say SMP on its rubber strap takes the cake in terms of comfort.

The seamaster is definitely heavier, but it is still comfortable even with its bracelet. It has a neat mircoadjust that I'd say works better than the glidelock...if only the bracelet tapered. I appreciate the tiny specs of polish on the bracelet vs the subs all brushed, and I don't think there's a comparison with the lume. The SMP is much much better, both in telling the time and in how long it lasts.

The sub is classic, goes with pretty much everything, and I'd say almost more jewelry like. The SMP has a more tool feel to it but still dresses up well.

In terms of their actual function (time telling), but SMP is more legible in more lighting conditions IMO, especially the white one. The anti-reflective coating is nice to have, not that the sub is hard to read, but it's easier to read the SMP at a glance.

Hope that helps.

[schoolboy]

Originally Posted by trippinjimmy

I'm sure others will weigh in, but I have both so I'll start...honestly I'd say they wear similarly.



The sub on its bracelet is more comfortable, but I'd say SMP on its rubber strap takes the cake in terms of comfort.



The seamaster is definitely heavier, but it is still comfortable even with its bracelet. It has a neat mircoadjust that I'd say works better than the glidelock...if only the bracelet tapered. I appreciate the tiny specs of polish on the bracelet vs the subs all brushed, and I don't think there's a comparison with the lume. The SMP is much much better, both in telling the time and in how long it lasts.



The sub is classic, goes with pretty much everything, and I'd say almost more jewelry like. The SMP has a more tool feel to it but still dresses up well.



In terms of their actual function (time telling), but SMP is more legible in more lighting conditions IMO, especially the white one. The anti-reflective coating is nice to have, not that the sub is hard to read, but it's easier to read the SMP at a glance.



Hope that helps.

Thanks!

I’ve seen older men with 5 digit submariners a couple times and the other day I saw an older guy wearing an older Seamaster 300 for the first time

Made me wonder the pros and cons of each watch

I feel that Rolex has way better marketing than Omega

I knew the Rolex name when I was 13 years old I think... and I grew up in a family that was a little financially right

So, I feel like many people buy a Sub because of the Rolex brand. Not so much because it is infinitely better than a Seamaster

That’s why I’m asking :D

I’m going to look into this further though!

[samson66]

Originally Posted by GsurgBM

Both. Both make great watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That blue is gorgeous. Makes the Sub look sort of pedestrian.

[JohnGingerwood]

Originally Posted by samson66

That blue is gorgeous. Makes the Sub look sort of pedestrian.

I agree, the SMP does have a better look.

[amanbra]

I quite like Omega. If I was forced to only have one watch it would be a 38mm AT. There are time and places were Rolex is risking in that you can garner an adverse reaction.

I don't sell watches so resell value doesn't bother me.

What I do love about Rolex is their designs are timeless and they're far more controlled with their design updates. They age so well.

[rootbeer7]

I was solely a Rolex owner for over 15 years, from my first ‘luxury’ watch a Rolex 16710 until the last couple of years, by which time I had a couple of Rolex, modern and vintage. I sold a few pieces and have lost interest in Rolex, because there’s seems to be very little interest in the brand (aside from here, but even that is changing) and more interest in how much it’s worth etc. I have a vintage Datejust, a Panerai and now an Omega Seamaster 300, the vintage reissue model which I think is just a perfect 3 hand watch and in my eyes a nicer piece than the equivalent Submariner, for literally one third of the price on the second-hand market.

[cruise_bone]

I have one Rolex and one Omega, along with IWC, Breitling, and other good brands.

My two favorites are my Rolex Explorer ii black dial with the Orange hand, and my Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean GoodPlanet GMT.
Purchased both thru DavidSW and they are my two favorite watches. The Omega came on the bracelet but my local AD had the rubber strap and it has been on the rubber since that day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykSsugnE-l8

That Omega is absolutely as fine a watch as my Explorer ii and they share 90% of my wrist-time. This Omega may even be technically better than my Exp ii. It can be a little thick under a tight dress shirt, so I just wear some other shirt on the days I am wearing the Omega.