The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 February 2017, 08:41 AM   #1
mobster600
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Yes
Posts: 1,477
Should I buy an AP 26320st? Whats your opinion of the 26320st?

Hi,

What's your opinion of the 26320st?

Has anyone owned it and traded it in for something else? or Would you keep it forever?

Its obviously a great watch in all ways possible....but what is it lacking?...I want the nitty gritty on this watch.

The watch is not cheap, that's why I want to get some opinions before I buy it.

mobster600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2017, 10:29 AM   #2
mobster600
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Yes
Posts: 1,477


its a beauty
mobster600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2017, 12:23 PM   #3
Islatate
"TRF" Member
 
Islatate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ken
Location: North of 49th
Watch: 5980/1R-001
Posts: 1,078
Great looking watch. IMO, the best looking chrono on the market. However I found the 41mm a tad too large for my wrist. I have owned the rg ROC 26320 on strap and ss ROC, both with the black dial, but just never felt comfortable with the size. The 39mm 26300 is a much better fit for my 7" wrist.
__________________
PP 5980/1R-001
PP 5146/1R-001
PP 5396/1G-001
AP 25940ok
Rolex 116520
Islatate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2017, 12:28 PM   #4
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,498
I am with Ken here. Beautiful reference but I think the 39mm ROC has better proportions and sat better on my wrist.
red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2017, 01:09 PM   #5
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,225
I liked my RG but sold it and eventually got the RG 44 which is my ultimate AP.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2017, 01:21 PM   #6
jem7v
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
I wouldn't keep the regular ROC forever. Well maybe actually since it is the best looking steel chrono.

But the lack of in house movement and display caseback really annoy me. I'd say once they add those it's worthy to kept.
jem7v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 01:19 AM   #7
Grnvette65
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 410
I find it to be a great watch,nice weight, date feature is helpful and the chrono pushers feel the best compared to my others. It's gets rotated as dictated by my mood, whenever I wear it I feel a sense of occasion. Agreed that it's expensive since you can get a pm watch for roughly the same price. The in house movement is not as important to me, look at the Daytona the zenith movement costs more on the used market. I also don't care about the case back as I rarely look at the movement. I have several others w open backs and I only looked when I actually got the watches... It's nice but for me a novelty. I have been very happy w mine. Good luck w your decision
Grnvette65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 01:46 AM   #8
kaiserphoenix
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/Tokyo
Watch: FPJ CO BL
Posts: 1,599
I find the movement a massive deal breaker but thats just my 2c.
__________________
F.P.Journe Chronometre Optimum Black Label, Patek 5811G-001, A. Lange & Söhne Lange 1 191.039, Patek 5167A-001, Rolex Yacht-Master 40 Everrose, (Wh) Rolex Daytona 116500, (Blue) Rolex Skydweller 326934, Rolex Submariner 126610LV

IG: tokyo_watch_guy
kaiserphoenix is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 02:57 AM   #9
Tomas Eriksson
"TRF" Member
 
Tomas Eriksson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 1,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaiserphoenix View Post
I find the movement a massive deal breaker but thats just my 2c.
What is wrong with a integrated column wheel chronograph? It's a lovely movement even if it isn't inhouse, in my opinion of course.

And for other comments above, on the contrary I find the slim 41mm size as almost perfect
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other…
Tomas Eriksson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 04:42 AM   #10
jem7v
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomas Eriksson View Post
What is wrong with a integrated column wheel chronograph? It's a lovely movement even if it isn't inhouse, in my opinion of course.

And for other comments above, on the contrary I find the slim 41mm size as almost perfect
Because for the price they charge it should be in-house. And have a display case back.
jem7v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 04:49 AM   #11
Hard_Six
"TRF" Member
 
Hard_Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Trey
Location: Texas
Watch: those three’s roll
Posts: 3,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomas Eriksson View Post
What is wrong with a integrated column wheel chronograph? It's a lovely movement even if it isn't inhouse, in my opinion of course.

And for other comments above, on the contrary I find the slim 41mm size as almost perfect
I think the 26320 is the best looking AP and the best looking chrono around. I also like the 41mm size. In fact, I was planning on buying one but the lack of the display case back and the lack of an in-house movement kept me from doing so. Those are the two deal breakers for me.

And it's not that there's anything wrong with the current movement (or anything that I would care about anyways), it's just that at this price point, I think it should have those features. And the thought of AP producing a newer version containing those features anytime in the near future, makes my mind wonder to the considerable value drop in the current model. I know that I would want one of the new ones and that would require moving the old version to acquire it. Taking that hit would cause me heartburn that I just simply don't want to deal with.

So for me, I'm on the sidelines for now. The moment they make a 26320 with the discussed upgrades, I'll likely buy it right away.

It's an amazingly beautiful reference for sure.
Hard_Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 04:52 AM   #12
masyv6
2024 Pledge Member
 
masyv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaiserphoenix View Post
I find the movement a massive deal breaker but thats just my 2c.
Most AP guys I know have the same issue. Most folks require in-house movements at this kind of price range....or at least a display back
masyv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 05:53 AM   #13
wach16
"TRF" Member
 
wach16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,116
You cant go wrong with ROC but as others have said, the 39mm wears much better on my wrists than the 41mm...good luck!
__________________

Rolex 228239
PAM00684
wach16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 06:33 AM   #14
dr3ziz
"TRF" Member
 
dr3ziz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Aziz
Location: London/kuwait
Posts: 911
I had ordered a boutique edition blue dial chrono. and after I got the call and went to pick it up at the boutique i saw a (now my) 44 ceramic offshore.
on the wrist there just was no comparing the 2 .. I payed a lot more money but got what caught my heart


moral of the story is Buy what sings to you
dr3ziz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.