The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 January 2018, 12:22 AM   #1
paneristinewb
2018 Pledge Member
 
paneristinewb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 22
Seamaster Planet Ocean vs 300m Diver

Hi guys, thinking about my next purchase and really love the Seamaster line of watches. I am really edging towards the PO because I love the wrist presence and size of it - keeping in mind that I own a Panerai and am a HUGE fan of those.

But my dilemma is that I would like something that could also be dressed up a bit in a formal setting. I know that the 300m will fit the bill, it is the James Bond watch after all ;) But wondering if it will be the same case regarding the planet ocean.

Any and all input appreciated. Especially if you can make your point with pics :)
paneristinewb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2018, 01:31 PM   #2
TimeRookie
2018 Pledge Member
 
TimeRookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 1,405
I’ve been trying to decide between the same 2 watches. I think the Diver 300 in black will dress up better. The PO is an amazing watch though. I gave mine to my son and I miss it. I’m thinking of replacing it.
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present)
116710 GMT Master II, BLNR
232.30.42.21.01.003 Omega Planet Ocean
TimeRookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2018, 01:48 PM   #3
ap1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 7,536
3hundo if pushing double duty
ap1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2018, 01:48 PM   #4
texasmade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 525
I have the old Seamaster 300M in blue with the wavey blue dial. I was thinking of adding the PO in 39.5M but when I tried it on, the watch was way too thick. The PO is much thicker than the Seamaster Pro. I'm not used to wearing watches that thick so the PO was a no go for me. If Omega just made the watch about 2mm thinner, the PO would replace my 300M.
texasmade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2018, 02:37 AM   #5
AEC
2018 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: East Aurora, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 363
I think the PO could be dressed up, but it will help that cause if you avoid the brightly colored versions (as much as I love them with the all-orange bezel and numerals!).
AEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2018, 11:28 AM   #6
stockjock1975
2018 Pledge Member
 
stockjock1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Cleveland, OH
Watch: Platona
Posts: 1,084
I wear my PO with a suit & tie regularly. I think it fits right in. The secret, in my opinion, is to avoid the versions with the bright, contrasting colors.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
stockjock1975 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2018, 11:52 AM   #7
WJGESQ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,254
The Seamaster 300 us no comparison.


Not even close.

PO all the way.
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2018, 06:05 PM   #8
mtb
"TRF" Member
 
mtb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Singapore
Watch: Sky/Sea/Land
Posts: 538
Personally I think those slight blings on the SMPc might work better when dressed up, and the thinner case should benefit those tight cuffs... but I never had the chance to find out, yet. :)



mtb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2018, 02:16 AM   #9
gmansbu
2018 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: north jersey, usa
Posts: 17
I would prefer the PO. Way more wrist presence especially considering you're used to wearing a Panerai. While the 300 is beautiful it is too small for my taste.
gmansbu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2018, 02:24 AM   #10
enigmad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: nj
Watch: Rolex 18038,16613
Posts: 26
Have always been a fan of the Seamaster. I love the size of the PO and its my daily wearer.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
enigmad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2018, 12:46 PM   #11
Pte6000
2018 Pledge Member
 
Pte6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NC
Watch: GMT & a Jubilee
Posts: 462
PO all day the GMT is such a special version and perfect size





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Pte6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2018, 02:39 PM   #12
htc8p
"TRF" Member
 
htc8p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 2,346
i just broke my personal record of 16 seconds. new record stands at 15"86.

sorry to hijack.

if your going to get a dive watch go for the omega planet ocean. if you want something dressy just buy another dress watch they all look the same anyway but the PO looks different
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20180110_100027 compressed.jpg (24.5 KB, 307 views)
htc8p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2018, 04:23 PM   #13
WJGESQ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pte6000 View Post
PO all day the GMT is such a special version and perfect size





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Do they make that with an Orange bezel-GMT?
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2018, 04:25 PM   #14
hedet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13
Having owned both, I think the 300 diver works much better as a dress watch. No one else will care either way tho
hedet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2018, 11:12 PM   #15
Pte6000
2018 Pledge Member
 
Pte6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NC
Watch: GMT & a Jubilee
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by WJGESQ View Post
Do they make that with an Orange bezel-GMT?


Not to my knowledge

They do have one with orange numbers as well as the Goodplanet, and black and white version.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Pte6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 08:28 AM   #16
Hoppyjr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 322
Iím generally not a fan of ceramic bezels, but Iíve owned several 45.5mm Planet Ocean models, including a few 8500 series. I found them just a bit too large and heavy for my taste (Iím a big guy and have 8Ē wrists) but Iím attracted to the design.

I recently picked up a black dial 8900 series PO in the new 43.5mm size. Itís perfect and I find it the best looking PO Iíve owned. The polished ceramic dial works well with the Liquidmetal bezel and itís lovely. This size is also ideal, being small enough to comfortably wear with a suit and still having good presence.

Here are some photos, including one for size comparison to my 16600 Sea Dweller and Sinn EZM 1.1

Hoppyjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 11:47 AM   #17
TimeRookie
2018 Pledge Member
 
TimeRookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 1,405
I made my decision. This is on its way for me!
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 260FDEA2-9C6A-465A-951D-FA3BC93CB57F.jpeg (165.0 KB, 252 views)
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present)
116710 GMT Master II, BLNR
232.30.42.21.01.003 Omega Planet Ocean
TimeRookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 11:57 AM   #18
Bengal fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 39
Good choice!
Bengal fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 05:07 PM   #19
Hoppyjr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeRookie View Post
I made my decision. This is on its way for me!


Congrats!

The new Omega adjustable clasps can be easily fitted in place of the stock clasp. It gives Glidelock-like adjustability to the Planet Ocean.

On that other forum (the one that starts with a W) there are threads about part numbers. The clasp runs about $150 +/- and you can install it yourself.

Enjoy your new Omega.
Hoppyjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 06:13 PM   #20
TimeRookie
2018 Pledge Member
 
TimeRookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 1,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoppyjr View Post
Congrats!

The new Omega adjustable clasps can be easily fitted in place of the stock clasp. It gives Glidelock-like adjustability to the Planet Ocean.

On that other forum (the one that starts with a W) there are threads about part numbers. The clasp runs about $150 +/- and you can install it yourself.

Enjoy your new Omega.
Thanks!! I will look into that.
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present)
116710 GMT Master II, BLNR
232.30.42.21.01.003 Omega Planet Ocean
TimeRookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 07:16 PM   #21
stevedssd
2018 Pledge Member
 
stevedssd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoppyjr View Post
Iím generally not a fan of ceramic bezels, but Iíve owned several 45.5mm Planet Ocean models, including a few 8500 series. I found them just a bit too large and heavy for my taste (Iím a big guy and have 8Ē wrists) but Iím attracted to the design.

I recently picked up a black dial 8900 series PO in the new 43.5mm size. Itís perfect and I find it the best looking PO Iíve owned. The polished ceramic dial works well with the Liquidmetal bezel and itís lovely. This size is also ideal, being small enough to comfortably wear with a suit and still having good presence.

Here are some photos, including one for size comparison to my 16600 Sea Dweller and Sinn EZM 1.1
Fantastic choice I have the same reference and agree it wears really nicely on the wrist for a relatively larger watch. Can't believe how small the 16600 looks in the comparison photo!
stevedssd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 01:32 PM   #22
paneristinewb
2018 Pledge Member
 
paneristinewb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 22
Thanks everyone for the responses. I am definitely edging towards the PO. Will try on the 43.5 tomorrow and probably pull the trigger next week.
paneristinewb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 02:17 PM   #23
paneristinewb
2018 Pledge Member
 
paneristinewb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 22
And here it is




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
paneristinewb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 02:35 PM   #24
texasmade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 525
Very nice.
texasmade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 10:31 PM   #25
stockjock1975
2018 Pledge Member
 
stockjock1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Cleveland, OH
Watch: Platona
Posts: 1,084
Fantastic!!!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
stockjock1975 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 10:34 PM   #26
TimeRookie
2018 Pledge Member
 
TimeRookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 1,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by paneristinewb View Post
And here it is




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Awesome choice! Iím very happy with mine as well. Good for you. Enjoy that watch!
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present)
116710 GMT Master II, BLNR
232.30.42.21.01.003 Omega Planet Ocean
TimeRookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 11:13 PM   #27
1William
2018 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 12,891
Good choice.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 04:43 AM   #28
Bengal fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 39
Great choice!
Bengal fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 05:33 AM   #29
stevedssd
2018 Pledge Member
 
stevedssd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,304
Nice one
stevedssd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 06:02 AM   #30
Fourier
"TRF" Member
 
Fourier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 14
Good choice. If you went for the 300m Diver, you'd be lusting after the PO still.
Fourier is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Banner Of The Month
*Banner Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2018, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.