ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 December 2012, 11:58 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: MA
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 11
|
Omega Flightmaster
I have had this vintage Flightmaster since the 1970s and am wondering if, considering the cost, it is worth restoring. The crystal is scratched. Watch is not running. Any comments would be appreciated.
|
22 December 2012, 04:43 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Marc
Location: USA
Watch: GO Sport Evo
Posts: 663
|
Yes, worth restoring. Best bet (and most expensive, but superb) would be to send to Bienne for a complete overhaul. The watch would come back as-new.
Cheers, -Marc |
22 December 2012, 04:56 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: MA
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 11
|
Marc, I did take the watch to a local dealer who said I might be looking at $1.5k to have Omega do the work. They said the watch was worth about $600 as it is and would probably not fetch more than $2k after Bienne. If they are correct, the economics don't seem to favor moving forward. I am primarily interested in turning the watch over for a datejust for my every day wear. Perhaps they were overstating the cost. Thanks for your advice. Just curious, but what is the vehicle in your image?
|
22 December 2012, 03:26 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Marc
Location: USA
Watch: GO Sport Evo
Posts: 663
|
Flightmasters are worth more than $2K fully restored. It would be a $3K to $3.5K piece easy afterwards. Watch is also worth way more than $600 as is. I had a Flightmaster Cal. 910 (admittedly a bit rarer than yours) but in worse shape and no bracelet that I sold about five years ago for $1500 (and had at least three solid offers after the sale, too).
I would send it off to Bienne and get the estimate, I think $1.5K is on the high side, but in any instance, you can be assured that all original parts will be used and the watch will look and function like new. My Avatar is the new Fiat 500...great car! Cheers, -Marc |
22 December 2012, 08:25 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: MA
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 11
|
That certainly puts a new perspective on it. I think I will look into sending it off to Bienne.
The Fiat is a neat looking car and 40 MPG is remarkable. Six months ago I acquired a Volt. It came with 3/4 of a tank of gas. It has about 5k miles on it and still has 1/4 tank of the original fuel. It only gets about 35 MPG on fuel but on batteries the cost to run it is about 1/3 the cost it would be on gasoline. Thanks for the advice. Paul |
23 December 2012, 03:34 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,012
|
If you know the movement number, here's a link to service prices:
http://www.sguscustomerservice.com/ |
23 December 2012, 03:40 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
Definitely worth restoring. I'll happily buy it off you at 600 bucks!
But It's worth more. So I won't buy it from you for 600! A nice flighty is in my neck of the woods about 2000-2500 euro. So I'm sure you won't make a whole lot of money on it, if that's what you want to do, but restoring it, I'm sure it will give you joy.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
23 December 2012, 09:49 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Australia
Posts: 22
|
You should keep it - a genuinely iconic watch from an era that produced far more individualistic timepieces then the current generation of watches IMHO.
From the link to Swatch USA service costs, yours is a Category 4A - for the 911 calibre and will cost just under a thousand bucks. Now assuming you don't need a whole lot of parts - the non running may simply be very old lubricant turned into gunk and clogging the works - it may come back looking like this one ... http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=240769 Now the value and other components accompanying this sale post aside, I think you would have an amazing looking timepiece which will be very accurate (I know mine is and it hasn't been serviced in at least 10 years) and no one else at any dinner party or business meeting you attend will have one on in the room Let us know what you decide. P.S. Here's mine - also would benefit from a spa treatment one day! |
23 December 2012, 08:33 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
Please don't send it to Bienne, it'll come back with service parts and ruin the originality of the watch not to mention cost a fortune. Get a quality independent watchmaker to overhaul the watch, give the case a very light re-brush, and a new crystal, price will be under $650 for all that, and you'll have correctly preserved the watch.
Send me a PM if you like and I can put you on to a good bloke in NJ that does a lot of vintage Omega work.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
23 December 2012, 11:16 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Australia
Posts: 22
|
Hi Ashley
Are you in Brisbane in Australia, which is where I live? Nice collection there as well. Regards Richard |
23 December 2012, 11:19 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
Quote:
There's a lot of Omega/Rolex guys in Brisbane and the Gold Coast
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
|
23 December 2012, 11:30 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Australia
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
The first Rolex in the family my wife will receive from under the tree in a day or so - a two tone 1980 Lady's Date that I had overhauled here in Brisbane over the last 2 weeks by an independent. A really lovely little thing and we will see if she likes it. My son tried on a two tone Daytona at AD Langfords 2 weeks ago (after a lot of research on the model) and is saving up to buy it! Have a nice Christmas and I will be in touch - and I hope we all convinced the OP to keep the Flightmaster |
|
24 December 2012, 02:02 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Marc
Location: France
Watch: 116710 & PAM372
Posts: 1,019
|
This watch HAS to be restored by Omega Bienne !
it is worth the cost you'll pay. My 2 cent opinion
__________________
Always look on the bright side of life... Watch addict... |
24 December 2012, 05:56 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Marc
Location: USA
Watch: GO Sport Evo
Posts: 663
|
|
24 December 2012, 07:17 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: MA
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 11
|
Thanks all for the advice. I am really not a collector, although after following this forum for a few days the notion is nipping at my heels. For reasons of domestic tranquility, I should probably guard against this. As I said in an earlier post, my original plan was to turn it over and buy a DateJust for every day wear. Restoration may be a more attractive prospect for someone a bit more qualified. I guess that since it has been sitting in my drawer for 40 years taking a little more time to weigh the options won't hurt.
|
24 December 2012, 09:39 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
Seriously, the first rule of vintage Omegas is you don't send anything valuable that needs to retain its originality to Bienne, and you don't replace parts unless you have to. Its not like Rolex, the movement parts for these are readily available.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
25 December 2012, 02:09 AM | #17 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Marc
Location: USA
Watch: GO Sport Evo
Posts: 663
|
Quote:
Not every watch can retain its 100% original parts during a service and many people, paying a lot for a service/restoration would expect the watch to look like new, not have faded hands and patina afterwards. If you want the original worn stuff retained, fine, have a local guy do the work. I would much rather have a restoration done at Bienne by the company that made the watch in the first place and has all the parts at their disposal instead of having someone else do the work. And the watch would still command a top price afterwards. Besides, they return the replaced parts to you, so you still have them if needed. I respect Omega for operating a vintage restoration facility to keep their old pieces running, much like Mercedes does with their Classic Center. -Marc |
|
25 December 2012, 08:13 AM | #18 | |||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
|||
26 December 2012, 11:38 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Donald
Location: Australia
Posts: 973
|
I'm with "dsio" on this subject.
|
26 December 2012, 12:23 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 461
|
It all depends ..
Brisman I am with you and dsio, regarding any iconic vintage Omega watch restoration. It will all depend on how serious an enthusiast is, regarding the restoration of his or her watch. As for me, if I were to learn that part of any vintage-watch has been touched-up, however slightly it may be, I shall stay away from it. If the tritium has been replaced with luminova, that watch becomes a so-called vintage-watch and no more, a vintage-watch. I will not even want to wear it, much less buy it. Movement parts can be replaced but only with original ones, since the beauty of a vintage-watch lies in its aged dial (including hands) and patina, as well as, its unpolished case with all sharp edges and contours, intact. |
26 December 2012, 08:30 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Donald
Location: Australia
Posts: 973
|
Some people like the Bienne restoration, and they do come back looking like new although at a hefty price.
Something original is special, collectors like this and can be done at a lower cost of a Bienne restoration. I believe an original is worth more than a Bienne restoration. I agree movement parts, crystal are okay to replace but I like the rest untouched. Here's my flightmaster. |
26 December 2012, 08:55 PM | #22 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 461
|
Indeed, a classic
Quote:
It is a classic and you know what you have, all the parts are Swiss made and Swiss assembled. Virtually 100% Swiss. Rolex and Omega do not subscribe to and recognize our nutty feeling that a vintage-watch should remain unaltered, save for movement parts and like what you said, the plexi-crystal too. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.