ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

acfcheung · 2 November 2019, 01:30 PM

Which one would YOU pick?

Plain and simple VS a rather expensive complication

Sent from my SM-N9750 using Tapatalk

locutus49 · 2 November 2019, 01:32 PM

I debated that very choice and went with the 67 since I don't travel much anymore. And I like the clean dial of the 67. If I had to do it over again I would do the same: 67 for me.

Jonbut76 · 2 November 2019, 01:43 PM

5164 every time. Just adds a bit more zing!

BigAppleBill · 2 November 2019, 02:18 PM

5164 because I travel fairly often.

sensui · 2 November 2019, 02:29 PM

For me the 5164 is the one that caught my attention. I thank two good buddies for the enabling.

Noak · 2 November 2019, 02:38 PM

I would go for the 67, the simple dial sings to me more, though I would prefer R over A.

For travel time, I would prefer 5990 or 5224 as the dial for both is better laid out compared to the slightly cluttered 5164.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BendyBee · 2 November 2019, 02:38 PM

5164 for sure.

mps354 · 2 November 2019, 05:16 PM

64 for me as I use the complication

baglady · 2 November 2019, 05:33 PM

I travel a lot, but find that that is not sufficient justification for a 64. If you’re after travel functionality, then spending 1/40th of the price on an Apple Watch will serve you far better.

It gets worse because the travel times across all PPs assume only one hour shifts. But try using the Travel Time when going to India? Or what if you live in India and travel to other parts of the world?

Therefore, only way to assess the 64 vs 67 is which looks better. I find that the 67 is a bit too barren for my taste. I want a busier face for the money I’d be spending on the watch.

yoast · 2 November 2019, 08:17 PM

64

Mike Jab · 2 November 2019, 09:48 PM

516

brandrea · 2 November 2019, 09:55 PM

Another vote for the 5164. I’ve never had one, but if I started into Patek I think that would be the one I land on.

AK797 · 2 November 2019, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandrea

Another vote for the 5164. I’ve never had one, but if I started into Patek I think that would be the one I land on.

As my wrist is like your wrist now, think it would look great on you.

Fat_ninja · 2 November 2019, 10:37 PM

I like the 67, it’s clean true to form.

That said Patek’s travel time and world time complications are so easy to use.

srvrf · 2 November 2019, 10:53 PM

The 64 has been a grail, but when I had the opportunity to buy a 67/1A, I pulled the trigger. Even though I think it looks best on rubber, I also love the bracelet. The travel time complication looks great, but I’m finding the combination of my 67 and iPhone to be all I need. So I’m still on a list, but am thinking the extra money I’d spend for a 64 could be better used towards something else

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mongrelnomoad · 2 November 2019, 11:05 PM

67 for me. I like the travel-time complication, but the payoff in thickness isn't worth it IMO.

ap1 · 2 November 2019, 11:33 PM

64 as it’s more intriguing to my eye. 67 a bit too plain. Prefer the 11 for that

Rushne · 3 November 2019, 12:03 AM

Have and love the 67 but also waiting for a 64 to come in at my AD

Fat_ninja · 3 November 2019, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ap1

64 as it’s more intriguing to my eye. 67 a bit too plain. Prefer the 11 for that

I’d love to see a diamond version

ts3 · 3 November 2019, 12:15 AM

No 5164 for me as I don't like the look of those left-side pushers and don't want any travel time complication.

At the same time I found the 5167 a little large for a basic three-hander w date on my small wrists when I tried it on many years ago. I didn't like it enough to pull the trigger back then (below MSRP (!) preowned).

I wish I had picked up the smaller and rare 5165 though, but since then I got two other three-hand plus date Pateks and am likely done on that front.

ap1 · 3 November 2019, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat_ninja

I’d love to see a diamond version

Imagine two stones instead of the white and blue disk for day/night.
Boom.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

0315 · 3 November 2019, 12:36 AM

5164 all day long

JR16 · 3 November 2019, 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by locutus49

I debated that very choice and went with the 67 since I don't travel much anymore. And I like the clean dial of the 67. If I had to do it over again I would do the same: 67 for me.

Same here

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

nyc2la · 3 November 2019, 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sensui

For me the 5164 is the one that caught my attention. I thank two good buddies for the enabling.

Bearxj86 · 3 November 2019, 02:49 AM

5167a - Had both and prefer the lighter, simpler timepiece

sensui · 3 November 2019, 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nyc2la

You guys know who you are!

mobster600 · 3 November 2019, 03:16 AM

I was doing the same comparison like 6-12 months ago. Great timing for me BTW.....prices went to STUPID levels as we all know. I didnt pull the trigger for that reason. BUT if prices were normal....I would go with a 5167.

I felt like i could scratch the itch with the 5167.

rockdrock · 3 November 2019, 04:20 AM

I’d go with the 64 since I have the 58 blue. Love the bigger dial, color and white gold. Always imagine what the 64 would feel.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Analysing You · 3 November 2019, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat_ninja

I like the 67, it’s clean true to form.

That said Patek’s travel time and world time complications are so easy to use.

67 with T stamp is clean enough for me

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fat_ninja · 3 November 2019, 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Analysing You

67 with T stamp is clean enough for me

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Gotta see the LV thing play out first... I’m not really a LV guy.

2 November 2019, 01:30 PM	#1
acfcheung "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: AC Location: Hong Kong Watch: SD4K for now Posts: 422	5167 vs 5164 Which one would YOU pick? Plain and simple VS a rather expensive complication Sent from my SM-N9750 using Tapatalk

2 November 2019, 08:17 PM	#10
yoast "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: HK Posts: 2,257	64 __________________ IG: @yoast.watch https://www.instagram.com/yoast.watch/

3 November 2019, 12:03 AM	#18
Rushne 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Stockholm, Sweden Watch: White 116500LN Posts: 862	Have and love the 67 but also waiting for a 64 to come in at my AD __________________ Omega: Seamaster Professional 300M 2220.80.00 Rolex: Daytona White Dial 116500LN Rolex: Sky-Dweller Blue Dial Jubilee 336934 Rolex: DateJust 36 Roman White Dial Oyster 126234 Rolex: OP 36 Celebration Dial 126000 Panerai: PAM 422 Patek Philippe: Aquanaut 5167A A. Lange & Söhne: 1815 Annual Calendar @mechanicaltom Stolen: IWC Portuguese 500107 Case number 3853222

2 November 2019, 01:32 PM	#2
locutus49 Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: John Location: La Jolla, CA Watch: Platona Posts: 12,194	I debated that very choice and went with the 67 since I don't travel much anymore. And I like the clean dial of the 67. If I had to do it over again I would do the same: 67 for me.

2 November 2019, 01:43 PM	#3
Jonbut76 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 163	5164 every time. Just adds a bit more zing!

2 November 2019, 02:18 PM	#4
BigAppleBill "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2019 Real Name: Bill Location: NYC Posts: 1,735	5164 because I travel fairly often.

2 November 2019, 02:29 PM	#5
sensui 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 12,356	For me the 5164 is the one that caught my attention. I thank two good buddies for the enabling.

2 November 2019, 02:38 PM	#6
Noak "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Home Posts: 142	I would go for the 67, the simple dial sings to me more, though I would prefer R over A. For travel time, I would prefer 5990 or 5224 as the dial for both is better laid out compared to the slightly cluttered 5164. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2 November 2019, 02:38 PM	#7
BendyBee "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2018 Location: Bangkok Posts: 204	5164 for sure.

2 November 2019, 05:16 PM	#8
mps354 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: CT Posts: 8,971	64 for me as I use the complication

2 November 2019, 05:33 PM	#9
baglady "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2019 Location: London Posts: 85	I travel a lot, but find that that is not sufficient justification for a 64. If you’re after travel functionality, then spending 1/40th of the price on an Apple Watch will serve you far better. It gets worse because the travel times across all PPs assume only one hour shifts. But try using the Travel Time when going to India? Or what if you live in India and travel to other parts of the world? Therefore, only way to assess the 64 vs 67 is which looks better. I find that the 67 is a bit too barren for my taste. I want a busier face for the money I’d be spending on the watch.

2 November 2019, 09:48 PM	#11
Mike Jab Banned Join Date: May 2019 Location: London Posts: 265	516

2 November 2019, 09:55 PM	#12
brandrea 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 73,587	Another vote for the 5164. I’ve never had one, but if I started into Patek I think that would be the one I land on.

2 November 2019, 10:37 PM	#14
Fat_ninja Banned Join Date: May 2018 Real Name: Jonathan Location: USA Watch: P-01 Posts: 11,772	I like the 67, it’s clean true to form. That said Patek’s travel time and world time complications are so easy to use.

2 November 2019, 10:53 PM	#15
srvrf 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Steve Location: Indiana Watch: PP/AP Posts: 2,075	The 64 has been a grail, but when I had the opportunity to buy a 67/1A, I pulled the trigger. Even though I think it looks best on rubber, I also love the bracelet. The travel time complication looks great, but I’m finding the combination of my 67 and iPhone to be all I need. So I’m still on a list, but am thinking the extra money I’d spend for a 64 could be better used towards something else Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2 November 2019, 11:05 PM	#16
mongrelnomoad "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Location: Here and there... Posts: 1,844	67 for me. I like the travel-time complication, but the payoff in thickness isn't worth it IMO.

2 November 2019, 11:33 PM	#17
ap1 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,036	64 as it’s more intriguing to my eye. 67 a bit too plain. Prefer the 11 for that

3 November 2019, 12:15 AM	#20
ts3 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2018 Location: Europe Posts: 3,227	No 5164 for me as I don't like the look of those left-side pushers and don't want any travel time complication. At the same time I found the 5167 a little large for a basic three-hander w date on my small wrists when I tried it on many years ago. I didn't like it enough to pull the trigger back then (below MSRP (!) preowned). I wish I had picked up the smaller and rare 5165 though, but since then I got two other three-hand plus date Pateks and am likely done on that front.

3 November 2019, 12:36 AM	#22
0315 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2019 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 105	5164 all day long

3 November 2019, 02:49 AM	#25
Bearxj86 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: Los Angeles Watch: 3970 Posts: 3,800	5167a - Had both and prefer the lighter, simpler timepiece

3 November 2019, 03:16 AM	#27
mobster600 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: USA Watch: Yes Posts: 1,477	I was doing the same comparison like 6-12 months ago. Great timing for me BTW.....prices went to STUPID levels as we all know. I didnt pull the trigger for that reason. BUT if prices were normal....I would go with a 5167. I felt like i could scratch the itch with the 5167.

3 November 2019, 04:20 AM	#28
rockdrock "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: North Carolina Posts: 1,120	I’d go with the 64 since I have the 58 blue. Love the bigger dial, color and white gold. Always imagine what the 64 would feel. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)