ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 November 2014, 02:35 AM | #31 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
gee sorry bud I didn't mean to hurt your feelings.. |
|
9 November 2014, 04:00 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 120
|
The 1655 is the nicest, most understated of all the Rolex Sports models in my opinion.
Classic, stylish and simple. Great looker |
9 November 2014, 04:37 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Very Nice Steve McQueen Explorer
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
9 November 2014, 05:20 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
Quote:
|
|
9 November 2014, 05:56 AM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
I call anything I'm selling a "Steve McQueen" in order to bump up the sales price. In fact come to think of it I'm really Steve McQueen in my internet fantasy life. Oh these foolish watch nicknames... More made up bs.
No offense. Congrats on your Fred flintstone ... Err Steve McCracken .... Um gmt with the funny looking hand. |
9 November 2014, 06:20 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 120
|
Funny post.
Doesn't get any dafter than Pepsi, Coke and Root Beer! When I inherited my 1675 (67) GMT Master a friend of mine told me it was "a nice looking Pepsi" I thought he was taking the piss! I've read up a bit since those days and have become accustomed to the terminology. |
9 November 2014, 10:42 AM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: london, uk.
Posts: 250
|
Quote:
And surely everyone knows good old Steve wore a Hanhart 417 (when he wasn't beating his wife or girlfriends), which was his favourite watch..
__________________
Rolex 1665 DRSD Rolex 1680 Red sub. |
|
9 November 2014, 11:46 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Beauties!
|
9 November 2014, 12:58 PM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Attleboro mass
Posts: 209
|
Why would anyone take my Fred flinstone post as angry? First of all I was clarifying that it is not a "Steve McQueen" watch...that is just the reality of it...if anyone is angry it is Fred...he deserves more respect than that!
And to the OP...sorry "bud" whoever you are...you certainly did not hurt my feelings. I hope you enjoy your Flinstone watch! |
9 November 2014, 06:45 PM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
Quote:
|
|
9 November 2014, 10:23 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Watch: Rolex 1680
Posts: 382
|
Orange Hand - Just found our where the confusion comes from!
***Messing around on a Sunday ... apologies to anyone who may own the copyright to the 'original' photo!*** |
9 November 2014, 10:45 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
|
Great 1655's guys I need one myself.
Well, back to drinking my Steve McQueen coffee from my Steve McQueen mug
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel |
9 November 2014, 11:47 PM | #43 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: John Baker III
Location: Spring,Texas
Watch: 1971 Red Sub
Posts: 2,221
|
Quote:
__________________
As I've grown older, I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing off everyone is a piece of cake. |
|
10 November 2014, 12:21 AM | #44 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Attleboro mass
Posts: 209
|
Yeah seeing him wear that sub is very confusing
Yaba dabba do! And by the way the wrong designation started somewhere so don't be so sure the flintstone won't catch on...but as annoying as that may be I will always call it the flintstone from now on That's just the way it is and always will be! Cheers! |
10 November 2014, 12:21 AM | #45 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Attleboro mass
Posts: 209
|
Yeah seeing him wear that sub is very confusing
Yaba dabba do! And by the way the wrong designation started somewhere so don't be so sure the flintstone won't catch on...but as annoying as that may be I will always call it the flintstone from now on That's just the way it is and always will be! Cheers! |
10 November 2014, 12:30 AM | #46 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
|
10 November 2014, 12:57 AM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
Quote:
|
|
10 November 2014, 01:28 AM | #48 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Attleboro mass
Posts: 209
|
I will
Cheers! |
11 November 2014, 04:19 AM | #49 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
|
11 November 2014, 04:27 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Watch: Rolex 1680
Posts: 382
|
|
11 November 2014, 11:58 AM | #51 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
|
11 November 2014, 12:43 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
Would a watch be worth more if Fred Flintstone wore it?
I think Steve and Fred wore this one, not the 1655 Mk I that you all claim they wore!
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_ |
11 November 2014, 01:43 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Can you guess?
Location: Texas
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 409
|
Great looking watch. Congrats!
__________________
"Comparison is the thief of joy." Theodore Roosevelt 116710LN 116610LV |
11 November 2014, 01:50 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,150
|
Way to highjack a thread. Thanks for sharing op, amazing watch
|
11 November 2014, 02:37 PM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Attleboro mass
Posts: 209
|
You are right!
|
11 November 2014, 05:33 PM | #56 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: bay area, ca
Posts: 303
|
Amazing! Hopefully can make this one part of the collection next year.
D |
11 November 2014, 09:51 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Way to come in here and hijack the thread, insult the other members, and make such a big deal about something so trivial.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
12 November 2014, 02:09 AM | #58 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
|
|
12 November 2014, 03:57 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 5
|
|
12 November 2014, 06:06 AM | #60 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Attleboro mass
Posts: 209
|
Well, one of you sent me a PM by mistake, so thank you for letting me in on what you are doing. You should make sure you are sending PM to the right person.
Secondly, I know you are trying to start a fight, likely to have me banned per the PM, so I will not take the bait. There was no hijacking of anything. My "comments" are factually based. There are no pictures or any evidence anywhere, on the internet, or otherwise, that support your contention that this is a "Steve McQueen" watch. Unless you have proof that he owned your watch or wore it, your labeling it a "Steve McQueen" watch is false. Simply not true. There is no support on the internet, or elsewhere, that he ever wore that model watch. So your contention that he wore that model is simply not factually correct, nor true. I made no personal attacks upon you, your livelihood, your "collection" or anything related to you other than your incorrect designation. You, however, have chosen to make personal attacks upon me. I do note part of your personal attack is your suggestion, or should I say inference, that you are somehow superior because you either have, or believe that you have, a "collection that is somehow superior, or more plentiful, valuable or voluminous, to one that I may or may not have. Now, you know nothing about me, or whether I have a "collection" or what I have in my "collection" nor do you know what kind of person I am. However, I do note that you and others continue to defend the identification of this watch and/or model in a completely incorrect and factually untrue way. It is no more a "Steve McQueen" watch than it is a Fred Flinstone watch. Just because you and other folks continue to say it is something that it is not, does not make it true, regardless of the number of times it is repeated. An untruth is an untruth, whether told once or a thousand times. I do note that you continue to argue in support of a contention that is not true, and that others are piling on in support of the person who is contending something that is not true, and condemning the person who has the factually valid position. Trumpeting this watch as a "McQueen" watch could be perceived as taking advantage of prospective purchasers who may see your post and others like it, who think that they are getting something related to Steve McQueen, which it is not. Since the truth clearly does not matter, anyone can call any item anything they so desire. And if it is repeated over and over, then it is ok. Sorry "bud" but, I do not conduct myself that way, on the internet, or in the real world. But, hey, that is just one person's way of living. I do know what Fred would say about continuing to make these representations about it being a "McQueen" watch, he would say "Yabba Dabba Don't" |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.