ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 September 2013, 06:58 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,785
|
I bought my 16610 back in 1999 for $3350 full retail at an AD.
Wish that I had bought 2 and left one in the bank vault.
__________________
16610 ♛ 16610LV ♛ 214270 MK2 "Life is far too short not to wear a Rolex!" |
10 September 2013, 07:42 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 746
|
Quote:
Comparing 2012's 114060 price with 1990's 14060 price is not the same. |
|
10 September 2013, 07:59 AM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: Plymouth Meeting
Watch: 116520
Posts: 3,209
|
|
10 September 2013, 08:20 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Ian
Location: NY
Watch: All of them
Posts: 3,245
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex, PPs, Breitling |
|
10 September 2013, 08:32 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 746
|
I know it was already discontinued that is why I wrote about its 2012 msrp. The AD in sioux city has still a few 14060m last time I checked. But then that would also be tad higher price than the older 14060 which the previous poster compared with the newer ceramic 114060.
|
10 September 2013, 08:47 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Watch: Rolex Cellini 5115
Posts: 512
|
Quote:
In the 1980s (in the UK at least), the Cosmograph was an utterly undesirable piece. They did not sell well at all compared to virtually every other model, and even when they did sell it was often only at a discount, or as part of a "if you buy this Day-Date instead of the Datejust you were thinking of, we'll throw in this stainless steel Cosmograph for a rock-bottom price" kind of deal. Definitely a case of "if only I had known", in terms of what your return on investment might be if you'd picked one up back then ! |
|
10 September 2013, 08:56 AM | #37 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 22
|
inflation...... it is still worth to get one nowadays with this retail price.
|
10 September 2013, 09:16 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 36
|
1970. PX price on 5513: $189.00. Fairly common on GI's wrists in Vietnam Nam. Probably lots still stuck in old vet's drawers somewhere.
|
3 September 2019, 09:01 AM | #39 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: USA
Watch: All of them
Posts: 464
|
Paid $775 for a GMT in 1982, State College PA. They gave me the watch for $100 down and $25 a month until paid off !!
|
3 September 2019, 10:49 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,421
|
Wow, post up a pic of that beauty.
__________________
126710BLRO-0001 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Silver Snoopy / PAM24 / PAM111 |
3 September 2019, 10:51 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: California
Posts: 64
|
Ouch I bought an omega seamaster for 1450 in 1996-7. Should of got a no date sub. That was when I was in college and just assumed Rolex would be a lot more
|
3 September 2019, 03:57 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
|
Almost exactly six years. That's a pretty solid necrobump.
An important thing to remember while discussing Rolex prices over time is that the watches aren't the same. A 2019 Rolex is meaningfully improved on one from 1990. |
3 September 2019, 04:22 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Jun
Location: Vancouver, BC
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 672
|
To put things in perspective. When I started working in 1991, I was earning $320/month as a developer.
|
3 September 2019, 10:03 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jack
Location: NYC
Watch: 16570, 16710
Posts: 1,534
|
aint inflation a B?
|
3 September 2019, 10:04 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 672
|
1990 what a great year, I was only 1 years old, I wish I knew then what I know now
|
3 September 2019, 11:17 PM | #46 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/Vin Omega
Posts: 1,972
|
Quote:
Just think if you paid double retail at that time for any of these references. Would have been a VERY long time before you recouped your money. I'm talking to YOU grey Daytona, Pepsi and Batman buyers!!! |
|
4 September 2019, 01:22 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Watch: PP, Rolex, PAM
Posts: 641
|
I bought my first Rolex in 1995, Explorer 11, I think I paid $2,400 and 2 years later, my SS white face and a Black Face at $7,900
|
4 September 2019, 01:30 AM | #48 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: 215
Posts: 470
|
wonder how much a big mac was in 1990
|
4 September 2019, 03:15 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Matt
Location: London
Watch: 116600
Posts: 38
|
I know this is an old thread but it’s very interesting nonetheless.
I’ve always thought that to the non WIS the Sub and SD were near identical watches. It’s interesting that in 1990 and in the 2000s the Sub and SD had a very similar price point. That seemed to change in 2014 when the SD4K launched. Still looked very similar to the Sub but at a much higher relative price point. Always felt Rolex over priced it which led to poor sales. This historic pricing seems to indicate the SD4K received a much higher price point relative to the Sub than previously seen. What do people think? |
4 September 2019, 04:39 AM | #50 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Mike
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 1,197
|
Good times
|
16 September 2019, 09:16 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: south carolina
Posts: 1
|
looking for the current selling price of a 1990 blue date oyster
|
16 September 2019, 09:17 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Los Angeles area
Watch: Daytona 16520
Posts: 230
|
Shocking lol, thanks for the share.
|
16 September 2019, 10:49 AM | #53 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Doug
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Daytona BLNR SubLV
Posts: 2,249
|
Quote:
I received a SS Datejust with Jubilee from Bailey Banks and Biddle (Pittsburgh, PA) in 1984. It was $975 new ... d@mn it appreciated pretty well in 6 years if this price list is correct. Here it is 24 years later in 2008... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
16 September 2019, 11:09 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 241
|
J
|
16 September 2019, 11:26 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA/UK
Posts: 1,287
|
Not sure i follow this thread... yes the sub has gone up in price and value.
But the S&P 500 without dividends has gone up 800% and with dividends revinvested, it has gone up 1600%. If you had any savings invested, might be good that you waitied. |
16 September 2019, 11:29 AM | #56 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,389
|
This is what sparked my interest in collecting. I was already a watch enthusiast but when I turned my first Rolex in for an “upgrade“ Rolex, I felt as though I had the screws put to me.
Been very smart and read up on every buy and sell since. |
16 September 2019, 12:13 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Collector
Posts: 1,482
|
The obvious dollar amount of then versus now is obvious- but factor in how many years of great memories that watch would’ve given to said buyer, in addition to where prices have gone.
Makes these buying decisions so much easier- |
16 September 2019, 12:13 PM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Unknown
Posts: 79
|
Rolex has increased prices on average 46% over inflation since 1990.
|
17 September 2019, 01:37 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3
|
Oh, thanks for sharing!
|
17 September 2019, 02:03 AM | #60 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Ross
Location: Chicago Area
Watch: 6265 18K Daytona
Posts: 928
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.