The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 May 2014, 12:49 AM   #61
REFZ
"TRF" Member
 
REFZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Martin
Location: Netherlands
Watch: The Rolex Way
Posts: 1,471
Thanks again for all the pics.

I'm pretty sure the 116600 will be the next addition to my collection.
__________________
114060 - 116520 - 126334
REFZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 12:49 AM   #62
CWIN
"TRF" Member
 
CWIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
Big congrats!! Love the new Dweller. There may be an incoming soon, haha.
CWIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 12:50 AM   #63
Spartan
"TRF" Member
 
Spartan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 450
thanks for the shots and info. Its time to go see this new watch in person :)
__________________
ROLEX1675:126660:226570BL:116613LN:114060
Pam00279 : Pam00270 : OMEGA3861 : Navitimer A23322 :
Spartan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 12:51 AM   #64
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
Excellent catch; congratulations!!! Very nice in deed.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 12:59 AM   #65
660ft
"TRF" Member
 
660ft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: LA
Watch: 1680
Posts: 161
Thanks for the pictures and the info. It looks like they did much better with the lugs on the SDc. Does it weigh much for than the SubC? Do you notice the difference on your wrist?
660ft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:01 AM   #66
artschool
"TRF" Member
 
artschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by 660ft View Post
Thanks for the pictures and the info. It looks like they did much better with the lugs on the SDc. Does it weigh much for than the SubC? Do you notice the difference on your wrist?
the weight difference is marginal, which is what i was hoping for.

the biggest difference visually is the markers that continue round the bezel.
artschool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:13 AM   #67
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,206
Looks fantastic on your wrist
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:15 AM   #68
artschool
"TRF" Member
 
artschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urosfan View Post
Looks fantastic on your wrist
thanks. am admiring your panerai!
artschool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:16 AM   #69
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,206
Thanks ill be posting my next aquisition shortly i hope cheers
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:16 AM   #70
kahoot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 423
Sd

This is mine
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (75.6 KB, 818 views)
__________________
SDC 4000
Explorer 2
kahoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:19 AM   #71
artschool
"TRF" Member
 
artschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by kahoot View Post
This is mine
congratulations!
artschool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:21 AM   #72
warrior
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,659
Congrats and thanks for the pics. Could you compare the "glare effect" on your new SD to your Sub ND. I've always loved the old SD 16600 because the glare was minimal compared to all the other Rolex divers. I think it has to do with the thickness of the crystal and smaller diameter of the crystal. Was wondering how this effect compares to your Sub ND-C. I would also think the matte dial further cuts the glare. Thanks
warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:22 AM   #73
Baselman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Switzerland
Watch: 1665 GreatWhite SD
Posts: 1,527
Nice pic
Baselman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:22 AM   #74
SWISSAHOLICS
"TRF" Member
 
SWISSAHOLICS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here!
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,366
Wow another one.....congrats.
__________________
16610LN | 16613LB | 16710 Pepsi | 118238 | 116500 (White) | 116500 (Black) | 116710BLNR | 116610LV

"The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."
SWISSAHOLICS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:27 AM   #75
kahoot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 423
Sd

Quote:
Originally Posted by warrior View Post
Congrats and thanks for the pics. Could you compare the "glare effect" on your new SD to your Sub ND. I've always loved the old SD 16600 because the glare was minimal compared to all the other Rolex divers. I think it has to do with the thickness of the crystal and smaller diameter of the crystal. Was wondering how this effect compares to your Sub ND-C. I would also think the matte dial further cuts the glare. Thanks
Hi
It has a Matt dial and has antireflective coating on the glass so no glare at all
__________________
SDC 4000
Explorer 2
kahoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:29 AM   #76
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
Congrats
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:31 AM   #77
warrior
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,659
Thanks for your response but I think you're mistaken. Rolex does not put A/R coating on their crystals on their watches--either on the outside or inside! What I was referring to...was the fact that the old SD ( compared to all the other Rolex divers Subs and DSSDs) had the least glare effect despite the lack of A/R. The old SD had a thicker flat crystal combined with the smaller diameter, which I believe contributed to this relative lack of glare. All the Rolex divers have this...the old SD had the least. And Im thinking this one has even less than the old SD.

I would think that your SD is much much better than your Sub ND in this regard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kahoot View Post
Hi
It has a Matt dial and has antireflective coating on the glass so no glare at all
warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:31 AM   #78
ocwatching
"TRF" Member
 
ocwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
THANK YOU so much for the various photos and side by side shots..
fantastic pickup..
congrats and wear it in good health..

I like the improvements in the lug and crown guard as well!
__________________
too much into watches...
ocwatching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:33 AM   #79
jazzyjeffm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Posts: 42
New one here too, seems great.
jazzyjeffm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:33 AM   #80
Sam Philip
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 4,345
Awesome watch, congrats!
Sam Philip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:34 AM   #81
artschool
"TRF" Member
 
artschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by warrior View Post
Thanks for your response but I think you're mistaken. Rolex does not put A/R coating on their crystals on their watches--either on the outside or inside! What I was referring to...was the fact that the old SD ( compared to all the other Rolex divers Subs and DSSDs) had the least glare effect despite the lack of A/R. The old SD had a thicker flat crystal combined with the smaller diameter, which I believe contributed to this relative lack of glare. All the Rolex divers have this...the old SD had the least. And Im thinking this one has even less than the old SD.

I would think that your SD is much much better than your Sub ND in this regard.
i think they look the about the same.
artschool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:34 AM   #82
artschool
"TRF" Member
 
artschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzyjeffm View Post
New one here too, seems great.
congrats

what do you think!
artschool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:38 AM   #83
SWISSAHOLICS
"TRF" Member
 
SWISSAHOLICS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here!
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,366
I see a contrast between the glossy ceramic bezel and the matt dial on the new SDC.....how does it look in person?
__________________
16610LN | 16613LB | 16710 Pepsi | 118238 | 116500 (White) | 116500 (Black) | 116710BLNR | 116610LV

"The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."
SWISSAHOLICS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:38 AM   #84
Raddave
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 13
WOW !

That is one fine looking machine there !
Raddave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:39 AM   #85
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,427
She's a beauty. Congrats!
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:39 AM   #86
warrior
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,659
Congrats to you for a great looking piece But, I'd be curious--next time you look at your Rolex ND Sub in the mirror and move your arm, you'll see a ton of glare. I have one : -). I would bet your SD will have less but again I'm not the one with your watch. Enjoy your new SD
Quote:
Originally Posted by artschool View Post
i think they look the about the same.
warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:40 AM   #87
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
cool - congrats!
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:40 AM   #88
Johnnyhayward
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Newcastle/EDI
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 123
Another new owner here too

Johnnyhayward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:43 AM   #89
artschool
"TRF" Member
 
artschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by warrior View Post
Congrats to you for a great looking piece But, I'd be curious--next time you look at your Rolex ND Sub in the mirror and move your arm, you'll see a ton of glare. I have one : -). I would bet your SD will have less but again I'm not the one with your watch. Enjoy your new SD
i am sure you are right. i will have a proper look later and it might be different in the sun.
artschool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2014, 01:43 AM   #90
adamlea
"TRF" Member
 
adamlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Great Plains
Watch: Exp II 216570 Blk
Posts: 1,190
Looks great - congrats. Thanks also for the comparison pics.
adamlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
116600 , sd4000 , seadweller


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.