The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 24 October 2020, 05:29 AM   #1
zhangster
"TRF" Member
 
zhangster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: San Jose, CA
Watch: guess
Posts: 50
New Omega owner - disappointed

I recently acquired a brand new Seamaster. It is a beautiful watch to be sure. But after 3 days of use and in comparison with my Rolex Submariner I am a bit dismayed at the disparity in quality. To wit:

I compare my watches to a cheap Citizen that has atomic accuracy. The Omega is off by about +5 sec per day, whereas my Rolex sub is less than +1 sec per day. So much for the "master chronometer" certification.

When I shake the watch I can feel and hear the half-circle weight spinning. Perhaps some people appreciate this, but I can only describe the vibration I feel in my palm as cheap and coarse. The Rolex on the other hand is very quiet. I cannot hear or feel anything.

I still like the Seamaster but I did not expect such a difference between an Omega and a Rolex.
zhangster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 05:36 AM   #2
Lesnerelli23
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Michigan
Posts: 736
Obviously this is a subjective matter but I have read that the reason you can feel the rotor moving is because of the ceramic bearings it uses. Pros - lifespan, Cons - having that "cheaper" feel... Hopefully I won't be disappointed by the Speedy I'm expecting soon :/
Lesnerelli23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 05:38 AM   #3
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,114
You need to compare your Omega to the 32 series Rolex movements
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 06:13 AM   #4
SPMN
"TRF" Member
 
SPMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: St Paul, MN
Watch: Tudor, Omega
Posts: 1,218
+5 seconds/day is within METAS standards, so no issue there from a technical standpoint. You may not like it, but there's nothing "wrong" with it. I would just suggest holding onto it for awhile and seeing if it gets more accurate as time goes by.

As for the rotor: Do you feel or hear anything while wearing it? Are you shaking it to wind it, or are you just playing around with your new watch? If you're just playing around with it, you should know there's nothing "wrong" with it, and you'll never hear or feel that "cheap" rotor feeling ever again. I had to take mine off to test it, heard and felt what you're describing, and put it back on my wrist. I'll probably never experience that again, as it's not a normal practice for me to wind a watch.
SPMN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 06:40 AM   #5
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,109
I own a few Rolex and Omega watches. Omega just doesn't have the feel that Rolex does. To be fair, few brands do. I think Omega has really come close with their latest pieces in the Seamaster 300 series. I just pulled the trigger on one and am impressed. The largest area for me that Omega still lags far behind is their bracelets. They feel more akin to the older Rolex bracelets than the newest ones.
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 06:44 AM   #6
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 42,991
Have it regulated, no need to be disappointed about something that is fully adjustable.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 06:52 AM   #7
zhangster
"TRF" Member
 
zhangster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: San Jose, CA
Watch: guess
Posts: 50
First thank you all for your responses. They have a calming effect on me.

SPMN, +5 second is right at the edge of the "master chronometer". Nothing wrong with it. I just wish it would have been closer to the 0 than the +5 edge.

I feel the vibration when I shake the watch, not when I wear it.
zhangster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 07:00 AM   #8
texasmade
"TRF" Member
 
texasmade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager135 View Post
I own a few Rolex and Omega watches. Omega just doesn't have the feel that Rolex does. To be fair, few brands do. I think Omega has really come close with their latest pieces in the Seamaster 300 series. I just pulled the trigger on one and am impressed. The largest area for me that Omega still lags far behind is their bracelets. They feel more akin to the older Rolex bracelets than the newest ones.
I always said that one thing I like about Omega that Rolex doesn't do is the ability to accessorize your watch. If you don't like the bracelet, there's the rubber strap option. If you don't like that, you can get leather straps. You can even fit other bracelets for certain watches.
texasmade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 07:06 AM   #9
herts9
"TRF" Member
 
herts9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 2,021
5 seconds is nothing worthy of being disappointed over

I'm sure there are PLENTY of fresh BLROs out there that are in the same boat
herts9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 07:19 AM   #10
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by texasmade View Post
I always said that one thing I like about Omega that Rolex doesn't do is the ability to accessorize your watch. If you don't like the bracelet, there's the rubber strap option. If you don't like that, you can get leather straps. You can even fit other bracelets for certain watches.
Agreed. I don't think Omega makes bad bracelets either. It's just that Rolex literally makes the best bracelets on the market. I mean they rival the haute horology brands like AP and PP. I actually think Breitling makes the next nicest bracelet in the price range comparatively speaking. Most other similar brands like IWC and Panerai come on straps and thus there isn't much for comparison.

The case, dial, bezel, movement of the Seamaster Diver 300 is on par with Rolex quality if you ask me. It's just that bracelet that is lagging. That's a tall order for any brand.
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 10:35 AM   #11
JohnGingerwood
2024 Pledge Member
 
JohnGingerwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Real Name: Zach
Location: USA
Posts: 1,476
Include the fact the SMP is less than half the price and you can get one by tomorrow.
JohnGingerwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 10:45 AM   #12
BradSomrak
"TRF" Member
 
BradSomrak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Brad
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR
Posts: 562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager135 View Post

The case, dial, bezel, movement of the Seamaster Diver 300 is on par with Rolex quality if you ask me. It's just that bracelet that is lagging. That's a tall order for any brand.
All true. The Seamaster on the rubber strap is a much “better” watch, aesthetically, at least, than on the steel bracelet. And that is because all bracelets in the sub-15k price point are compared directly to Rolex.
BradSomrak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 11:01 AM   #13
texasmade
"TRF" Member
 
texasmade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Lone Star State
Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS
Posts: 2,326
I agree that the bracelet needs updating. I have the 2220.80 (Casino Royale) version and I normally wear it on a strap now.

I’ve seen pictures of the the 41mm Seamaster on an older style bracelet more similar to the Speedmaster Pro, and the watch looks much better on that bracelet.
texasmade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 11:35 AM   #14
WAK4
2024 Pledge Member
 
WAK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by zhangster View Post
.

When I shake the watch I can feel and hear the half-circle weight spinning. Perhaps some people appreciate this, but I can only describe the vibration I feel in my palm as cheap and coarse. The Rolex on the other hand is very quiet. I cannot hear or feel anything.

.
Better stay away from Patek then
WAK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 08:11 PM   #15
mmaggi
"TRF" Member
 
mmaggi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Real Name: Michael
Location: Nassau County, NY
Watch: 16710
Posts: 889
You're entitled to your opinion and it's your money. But I think you're splitting hairs. Omega makes outstanding watches that are comparable to Rolex.
mmaggi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 09:44 PM   #16
1William
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,325
I own a Sea Master 300 and a Rolex Submariner-C ND 114060. Both are great watches for what they are and depending on the categories you use to measure them you have some wins for each. I would catch a breath on the timing issue as you are within specs and the watch is new. Give it some wear and see if it does not get better. I have found with my Omega watches, over the years, do better when worn as opposed to being wound and left in a watch box or on a winder. I also would do you timing over a week and not a day to get a better example of how it is doing. I am a huge Rolex fan and the Submariner is where I started and will finish but the Sea Master 300, for the money, is a better watch in my opinion. It does not have the crown but it also does not cost 10k. Enjoy your watch.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 10:06 PM   #17
winst
"TRF" Member
 
winst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 6,466
I think you definitely need to give it a little more time - accuracy could improve after a few more weeks wear.
winst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2020, 11:32 PM   #18
macrowatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,365
Yes, Rolex Reigns king in subtle and non obvious ways.

The good news is that at least you didn’t buy a PP 5167 only to feel cheap about the rotor noise the watch makes!
macrowatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2020, 12:02 AM   #19
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,265
OP, what are the price differences for your comparo? Obviously the Omega can be re-regulated if you want her more accurate. Rotor noise is a product of the design that adds durability over quieter rotor designs.
__________________
__________________
“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2020, 04:39 AM   #20
dchang81
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 2,017
If you're that bothered by +5 you need to get quartz watches.
dchang81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2020, 05:57 AM   #21
Nodzex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 649
I have 2 Seamasters and one is +2 secs while the other is -2.
However my Sub is +4 and GMT II is +1 secs a day!
Nodzex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2020, 06:45 AM   #22
vman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,224
What you hear is normal for the movement. Other watches have the same noise, especially pronounced when the watch does not have a solid caseback.
__________________
Collector and buyer of Lange, VC, Patek | 2 FA Enabled
vman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2020, 07:19 AM   #23
AEC
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,221
Shaking watches is generally not recommended.
AEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2020, 07:25 AM   #24
JP(Canada)
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary, AB, CAN
Posts: 794
The newer Omega calibres come with ceramic bearings. This is generally thought to be a good thing. Rolex has gone to a similar design in their latest movement, making it now audible when the rotor swings around.

As for accuracy, it sounds like its within specifications, but if there's a boutique near you, they will likely dial it in closer for you upon request.

I have a couple modern Omegas. One is a 8400 (no ceramic bearings, and no noise) and a newer 8800 (makes some noise and has the ceramic bearings), and both run much higher amplitude than anything else in my box, including a couple of Rolex. Accuracy really depends on regulation a lot more than what brand of watch you're wearing.
__________________
JP
JP(Canada) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2020, 09:57 AM   #25
JR16
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,174
OP, your watch is completely normal and within spec, so please enjoy it!! Additionally not sure it’s fair to compare a watch that is half the cost of another though some do try. Lastly, if you don’t like the rotor spin, you’ll hate a PP 5167 and 5711


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
JR16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2020, 11:06 AM   #26
77T
2024 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,569
At about half the price of the Sub, I’d say you got what your paid for.

That’s not a slam - just a price for value comparison.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2020, 08:40 AM   #27
PRabbit
"TRF" Member
 
PRabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 116
I don’t care when people say one is objectively better than the other. It’s purely preference for the differences between the two.

I literally just sold my 4 month old blue dial SMP 300 diver and purchased a 116610LN sub date a couple weeks ago. I’ve come to the opinion there is no difference in overall quality whatsoever. The much higher price is solely due to way higher Rolex demand that doesn’t really have to do with quality, but more just from Rolex brand awareness.

The higher price doesn’t really bring any extra quality to the sub vs SMP. I sold the SMP a couple weeks after buying the sub. So I was able to hold them both in my hands right next to each other, and I couldn’t for the life of me notice any extra ‘quality’ in the sub.

I’m sticking with the Sub just because I like the design more and don’t like the HE valve on the SMP, etc. But, I’m sticking with the Sub just because of my preferences, not because I found the sub to be of any higher quality.

Edit: Concerning accuracy, my SMP was +2spd. So that’s just luck of the draw rather than all SMPs running up to +5spd. Compare that with my DJ41 I bought months back and had to send in for warranty within the first month of ownership due to it running -7spd.
PRabbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2020, 12:43 PM   #28
PLNYC
"TRF" Member
 
PLNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mars
Posts: 1,683
My speedy is more accurate than my 32xx Rolex
__________________
PLNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 03:25 AM   #29
Dsmith1974
"TRF" Member
 
Dsmith1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,262
A new watch will need a breaking in period before you can measure accuracy. The rotor noise is probably down to ball bearings which a more durable design.

There are many reasons to favour a Sub over SM but these aren’t two of them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dsmith1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 03:55 AM   #30
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by dchang81 View Post
If you're that bothered by +5 you need to get quartz watches.

No you don’t, but you might want to think about having your watch regulated.
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.