ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 January 2019, 10:18 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Earth
Watch: 5513
Posts: 21
|
Looking for opinion on 16750
Hello there,
I'm slowly looking for a nice birth year (1981) GMT (ideally on jubilee, but watch is more important than the bracelet to me). I'm in EU and limited with local sellers (fees + taxes). And the prices are crazy now... I have a two watches on my radar so far, from different dealers in Germany. I know it is impossible to evaluate a watch from just one picture, but, if taking that serials and movement are ok on both, which one appeal better to you? One on the left has a blueback insert and maybe almost too sterile for the age. (probably due to professionally refinished case). The one on the right has redback insert and cost 2k more. Would like to hear your thoughts. Thanks! |
9 January 2019, 11:21 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Yes, it is !
Location: Cheshire & Mersey
Watch: Military issue Sub
Posts: 1,319
|
I'd always go for the more robust Oyster bracelet myself, if all else is equal.
You may wish to change the heading: the GMT-Masters at that time were 16750 but you have typed 16570, the code for a later Explorer II. Insta : haywood_milton_rolex
__________________
*Comex:5513,5514,1665x2,16800x2,16600 *Mil sub:5517x2,5513x9,5512 *Submariner:6536/1x2,5508,5513 PCG u/line & double SWISS (America's Cup),5513 giltx2, 5513 m-firstx2,5513 gloss WGx2,1680 Red,1680 White Mk1 & Mk2 *Sea-Dweller:1665 DRSDx3,Great Whitex3 *GMT-Master:6542x2 (1 Bakelite),1675x8 (2 gilt), 16750 & SeaKing 116710LN *Explorer:1016x6 (1 gilt),5500x3,14270 Blackout, Orange 1655 x4 *Milgauss 1019x3 *Cosmo 6263 *RNCD DSSD 116660. |
9 January 2019, 11:40 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Earth
Watch: 5513
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
Misspelled the reference, thanks for pointing this out. Fixed now. |
|
9 January 2019, 11:56 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Prague, CZ
Posts: 127
|
I personally prefer the look of jubilee on GMT, but that's subjective since there is 2k difference I would go for the left one. Out of curiosity what are the prices ?
|
9 January 2019, 11:59 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
Love the patina on the right but I'm not sure it's worth an extra 2K. Also the red and blue back were both correct for this period. Mine on my 16750 is red but no one knows but me. I wouldn't focus on the bracelet as the other could be sourced later. Its nice to have both bracelets.
|
10 January 2019, 12:29 AM | #6 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Earth
Watch: 5513
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
Looking how 16750 coming closer and closer to 1675, I think if I shouldn't wait a bit and add a bit to get a four digit ref. But no quickset... Not sure. Quote:
|
||
10 January 2019, 12:46 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
Quote:
I’ll tell you, I’ve had a 1675 and with the small twin lock crown, it’s a misery to set the date. I much prefer the 16750 and it’s more rare with the matt dial. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
10 January 2019, 01:00 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Earth
Watch: 5513
Posts: 21
|
|
10 January 2019, 02:06 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 421
|
Love the look of the right one. Tough call for the extra cash though. Really like the dial!
|
10 January 2019, 03:30 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Earth
Watch: 5513
Posts: 21
|
|
11 January 2019, 06:16 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 6,649
|
Exactly why I went with a 16750 over a 1675. Well, the quickest and the fact, I could save a few grand.
|
11 January 2019, 06:19 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 6,649
|
Disclaimer, I know next to nothing so don't put much weight in my opinions. That said, I think they both look amazing. Patina appears to match on dial and hands. Could be relumed, but who knows.
Personally, based on the information you have provided, I would go with left because it looks great and it's significantly less. Is the B&P situation the same on both? |
15 January 2019, 04:22 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Earth
Watch: 5513
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
Thank you! Both no B&P... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.