The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 August 2017, 09:27 PM   #31
KBM
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amex4711 View Post
great watch, but I think it's to big for your wrist, my personal opinion
All opinions are welcome, thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1William View Post
I had the 425 on my wrist at my AD this past week and could not pull the trigger. I own the 422 and for me it is just a little to close in appearance. I know, different case, no second hand, etc. but the overall look of the watch is close for me. I like the 233 but not the premium they bring. All cool watches.
I can relate, especially if you want to keep your collection relatively small. The 233 is priced quite a bit above the base models, that is one of the reasons I've gone back and forth with it a few times and haven't pulled the trigger.
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2017, 10:07 PM   #32
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauebm View Post
Really? How do you figure? Because of the dial layout?
232 (not 233) has different movement and sold caseback. The profile of the case is even thinner than the 425. I bet there is a google image out there with that comparison. It results in the 232 wearing smaller!
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2017, 10:14 PM   #33
KBM
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
232 (not 233) has different movement and sold caseback. The profile of the case is even thinner than the 425. I bet there is a google image out there with that comparison. It results in the 232 wearing smaller!
Great to know, thanks!!
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2017, 10:20 PM   #34
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
They are both great watches but I really think the 533 looks as good on you as the 232. But if its a personal question of comfort you must go for the one that feels best to you. An uncomfortable watch stays in the watch box.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2017, 01:10 AM   #35
Sublovin
"TRF" Member
 
Sublovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,354
Great choices...get the one YOU like. Tough to go wrong!
Sublovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
pam 425 , pam 533 , wristshot


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.