The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 March 2018, 02:16 PM   #1
thomaswentworth
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Tom Wentworth
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex 116610 Sub
Posts: 541
2018 Rolex Jubilee Analysis... A surprise...

See for yourself... Check the width of the outer links compared to the inner links in the Rolex teaser video and two other Jubilee bracelets. The ratio is different. What does this mean? To me, it seems that it could mean two things.

1. The inner links are wider so the bracelet will be 21 or 22 mm wide.

2. The outer links are less wide and the inner links are wider which will ensure a stronger center area which should reduce ability to stretch, but if you have felt a recent Jubilee, they are very sturdy. Not anything like the old ones.

The outer link to inner link width ratio is definitely different.

Attached is a photo to show what I'm talking about. Check it out. What could this mean?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 03-19-2018-jubilee.jpg (138.2 KB, 1236 views)
thomaswentworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:19 PM   #2
Flywheel
"TRF" Member
 
Flywheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 628
I noticed that too. Might be a new transitional jubilee for sports models.
Flywheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:21 PM   #3
101031-28
"TRF" Member
 
101031-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,741
Good observation.. The ratio is definitely different.. Possibly a larger case too?
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex.

Ian Fleming
101031-28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:22 PM   #4
Fleetlord
"TRF" Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,920
A 48mm Datejust!

I'm in
Fleetlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:22 PM   #5
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Already discussed.

See here, also.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:23 PM   #6
thomaswentworth
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Tom Wentworth
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex 116610 Sub
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by 101031-28 View Post
Good observation.. Do you think larger case too?
Now I'm thinking slightly larger case and slimmer inner lugs. Maybe a 41 mm case. I don't think they will go 43 with this one, but maybe. What would the world do with a 43mm GMT on the loose? It would be mass hysteria.
thomaswentworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:24 PM   #7
thomaswentworth
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Tom Wentworth
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex 116610 Sub
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
Thanks Mr. Stone... I try to read all I can, but I overlooked that it had been discussed already. Thanks for pointing that out.
thomaswentworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:27 PM   #8
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by thomaswentworth View Post
Thanks Mr. Stone... I try to read all I can, but I overlooked that it had been discussed already. Thanks for pointing that out.
No worries. The point I was making is that in the wide shot of the bracelet, we can see that the outer links are normal width. The people thinking the proportions are different are focusing on the shot of the bracelet closest to the clasp. I don't think the video rendering is much, if any, different from a standard Jubilee.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:29 PM   #9
thomaswentworth
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Tom Wentworth
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex 116610 Sub
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
No worries. The point I was making is that in the wide shot of the bracelet, we can see that the outer links are normal width. The people thinking the proportions are different are focusing on the shot of the bracelet closest to the clasp. I don't think the video rendering is much, if any, different from a standard Jubilee.
I just laughed my butt off at your response to the guy in that main thread who said tapatalk is broke and he keeps getting replies even though he unsubscribed... There over over 661 replies and 51000 page views in that thread
thomaswentworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:34 PM   #10
Flywheel
"TRF" Member
 
Flywheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
And?
Flywheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:49 PM   #11
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flywheel View Post
And?
And what? I've made my point in that thread and this one. What's your question?
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:49 PM   #12
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by thomaswentworth View Post
I just laughed my butt off at your response to the guy in that main thread who said tapatalk is broke and he keeps getting replies even though he unsubscribed... There over over 661 replies and 51000 page views in that thread
Yeah, Basel Fever is at full virulence, no doubt.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 02:55 PM   #13
Flywheel
"TRF" Member
 
Flywheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
And what? I've made my point in that thread and this one. What's your question?
A couple of buried references by you. The topic can’t have its own thread?
Flywheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 03:05 PM   #14
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flywheel View Post
A couple of buried references by you. The topic can’t have its own thread?
Yes, it can. My post was unnecessarily brusque, and didn't explain my point clearly. I would edit it, but since it's already been quoted twice, I don't know that it will do any good. My point wasn't that this issue shouldn't be discussed, but that the focus on the links nearest the clasp leads to a faulty analysis and conclusion, which are the bases of the thread. Ultimately I think it's a non-issue. Anyway, my apologies to Tom for sounding snippy.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 03:11 PM   #15
Flywheel
"TRF" Member
 
Flywheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
Yes, it can. My post was unnecessarily brusque, and didn't explain my point clearly. I would edit it, but since it's already been quoted twice, I don't know that it will do any good. My point wasn't that this issue shouldn't be discussed, but that the focus on the links nearest the clasp leads to a faulty analysis and conclusion, which are the bases of the thread. Ultimately I think it's a non-issue. Anyway, my apologies to Tom for sounding snippy.
It’s all good.
Flywheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 03:30 PM   #16
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Here are some more pics.

Video shot with questionable link proportions:


DJ41 Jubilee at the clasp:


Wide shot of bracelet in the video. Note the links on the bottom half nearest the watch head:
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 03:51 PM   #17
GFONG
"TRF" Member
 
GFONG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Galen
Location: SG / HK
Watch: Lange / Rolex
Posts: 2,810
I don’t have DJ41. Would like to know : IF ignoring the proportion of each link, does the teaser bracelet and clasp look similar to the DJ41 bracelet and clasp?
GFONG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 04:01 PM   #18
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,499
Looks like the polished links cover more surface area? So, more shine/sparkle/bling?
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 04:20 PM   #19
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFONG View Post
I don’t have DJ41. Would like to know : IF ignoring the proportion of each link, does the teaser bracelet and clasp look similar to the DJ41 bracelet and clasp?
The clasp is different, since the DJ does not have a flip-lock clasp. I think that's one of the major takeaways of the teaser: it's a sport clasp on a Jubilee, which is attached a sport case. It also has PCLs, which (based on the appearance of the case) means it's either on a GMT, or is PM on a Sub (unless Rolex is breaking two precedents by having both a Jubilee and PCLs on a stainless Sub.) As for how the rest of the bracelet compares to the Jubilee on DJ, I don't have a DJ, so I can't say exactly. But I've seen lots of pictures, and the one in the video doesn't look that different to me. That said, we don't get a good view of it.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 07:36 PM   #20
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,604
Anything on a new jubilee would be great!
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00
Zenith 02.470.405
Henry Archer Eclipse

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 07:41 PM   #21
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Clearly it’s s sports model jubilee...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2018, 09:48 PM   #22
joli160
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
Looks like the polished links cover more surface area? So, more shine/sparkle/bling?
Would love that
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2018, 12:44 AM   #23
drmizzou
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Enthusiast!
Location: Midwest
Watch: Collector!
Posts: 1,761
Good eye OP. Hadn’t noticed that. As others may have stated: it’s likely that minor changes like this will allow this bracelet to only be used for the specific model that it’ll come with. We’ll see tomorrow!
__________________
HULK
BLNR
YG Daytona 116515
Pepsi GMT 126710BLRO
White DaytonaC 116500
Omega Seamaster 50th Anniv Bond OHMSS
Omega Seamaster Bond titanium
drmizzou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2018, 12:51 AM   #24
Token74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,707
Maybe it's going to be a lady's GMT at 37mm. Oooh...that would make this forum explode with rage!
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count.

Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune
Token74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.