ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Tommysol · 28 December 2009, 01:12 AM

PAM 312 38 Votes

PAM 233 25 Votes

Tommysol · 23 January 2010, 05:43 PM

Here is a previous poll related to the post below.

frch1104 · 24 January 2010, 02:27 AM

233!
Love the domed crystal.
//Fred

ASH · 24 January 2010, 05:45 AM

233 as I like the manual wind 8 day movement!

grieven · 31 January 2010, 08:47 PM

I vote 233.

312 is nice, but 233 rocks.

ASH · 2 February 2010, 01:20 PM

IMG00425-20100201-1816.jpg

IMG00427-20100201-1817.jpg

Changmaisausage · 2 February 2010, 05:00 PM

233 everytime though both a great looking watches

Changmaisausage · 2 February 2010, 05:00 PM

233 everytime though both a great lookign watches

Joey_V · 2 February 2010, 05:20 PM

I'm beginning to like the 233 more and more...

Mlpugh · 8 April 2011, 03:23 AM

If you have the cash for the 233... Get the 312 and put the extra cash towards the 382:)

chazha · 8 April 2011, 05:24 AM

312 for sure.. if the cash wont be a problem i would still go for a 312.
A Panerai for me gotta be clean and simple. If i need 10 days PR and GMT ect... I would go for JLC, AP or other makers.

312 would win with 312 votes against... guess the rest :D

SubKing · 8 April 2011, 06:06 AM

233 for me!

Morax · 8 April 2011, 06:26 AM

312 ... my next watch I hope :)

psv · 8 April 2011, 06:39 AM

Easy one - 233.

superb · 8 April 2011, 11:40 AM

233 is my choice here.

Watch Fan · 9 April 2011, 09:36 AM

For me it's the 312.....just "has it all" for me.

dddrees · 9 April 2011, 07:29 PM

312 because I dislike the vertical power reseve indicator also.

+SwissWatch · 10 April 2011, 05:07 AM

looks: 233
special feature(PR): 233
cost: 312
movement: 312
case&bezel: 312
my vote: 312

hng · 16 April 2011, 11:34 PM

You can buy 2 312 with a cost of 233 so I'll go gor 312 and 323 :)

Fearsome Puppy · 17 April 2011, 01:51 AM

Though I own a 312 and not a 233, I'd vote for the 233...

heart82 · 17 April 2011, 11:03 AM

233 for me!!! got one more hand!!!

marcinthemiddle · 17 April 2011, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heart82

233 for me!!! got one more hand!!!

Cool! Is that the one you own?

dddrees · 17 April 2011, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psmith

312 for me

Lovely as the 233 is, I don't like the linear power reserve meter. A circular dial would be much nicer imho...

Tommysol - add a poll to this thread, so it will be easy to see the outcome.

Cheers

X2

For some reason I don't much care for the linear power reserve indicator either.

topcat30093 · 17 April 2011, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fearsome Puppy

Though I own a 312 and not a 233, I'd vote for the 233...

That goes for me as well, if only I could have afforded the difference.

SeanLandsnaes · 19 April 2011, 12:14 PM

Both excellent watches but the 233 with the 8 days manual wind mvt and domed crystal cant be beat! For the money the 312 is a great buy....

flyinbrian · 19 April 2011, 12:31 PM

I love the 233 but get by with my 352 :)

bcacncnc · 19 April 2011, 03:59 PM

I have a 233, but I also think the 312 is a great! Both are great choices.

TopNotchChach · 19 April 2011, 04:38 PM

312

sandybax · 19 April 2011, 08:30 PM

312 for me. I love the simplicity of the dial, I love the "9" and I think that 233 dial is too busy. Having said that, I have to note that a more fair comparison would have been 320 vs 233 as both are GMTs, but even in that case I would vote for 320.

Tommysol · 28 April 2011, 07:40 AM

an amazing response to this post...thanks!

28 December 2009, 01:12 AM	#91
Tommysol "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: California Posts: 591	The poll results are now lopsided as follows: PAM 312 38 Votes PAM 233 25 Votes

24 January 2010, 05:45 AM	#94
ASH "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Scott Location: El Paso Watch: PAM 233 Posts: 559	233 as I like the manual wind 8 day movement! __________________ SS White dial Rolex Daytona, Rolex DSSD, Rolex Milgauss GV, Panerai 233, Panerai 111, Tudor Pelagos, Casio G shock.

31 January 2010, 08:47 PM	#95
grieven "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: California Posts: 3	233 looks better I vote 233. 312 is nice, but 233 rocks.

2 February 2010, 01:20 PM	#96
ASH "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Scott Location: El Paso Watch: PAM 233 Posts: 559	My 233 on a Micah Mauser strap IMG00425-20100201-1816.jpg IMG00427-20100201-1817.jpg __________________ SS White dial Rolex Daytona, Rolex DSSD, Rolex Milgauss GV, Panerai 233, Panerai 111, Tudor Pelagos, Casio G shock.

2 February 2010, 05:00 PM	#97
Changmaisausage "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: David Location: UK/Qatar Watch: SeaDweller Posts: 470	233 everytime though both a great looking watches __________________ Patek Phillipe / Rolex / Tudor

23 January 2010, 05:43 PM	#92
Tommysol "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: California Posts: 591	Here is a previous poll related to the post below.

24 January 2010, 02:27 AM	#93
frch1104 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Fredrik Location: Sweden Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 239	233! Love the domed crystal. //Fred

2 February 2010, 05:20 PM	#99
Joey_V "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Joey Location: Dallas, TX Watch: SS Sub 16610 M Posts: 3,824	I'm beginning to like the 233 more and more... __________________ Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015 Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD

8 April 2011, 03:23 AM	#100
Mlpugh "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Utah Posts: 66	If you have the cash for the 233... Get the 312 and put the extra cash towards the 382:)

8 April 2011, 05:24 AM	#101
chazha "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: ChairmanMao Location: NY, US Watch: mickey watch Posts: 837	312 for sure.. if the cash wont be a problem i would still go for a 312. A Panerai for me gotta be clean and simple. If i need 10 days PR and GMT ect... I would go for JLC, AP or other makers. 312 would win with 312 votes against... guess the rest :D __________________ I am always single, even when I am married.

8 April 2011, 06:06 AM	#102
SubKing "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: USA Watch: where do i start?? Posts: 3,254	233 for me!

8 April 2011, 06:26 AM	#103
Morax "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Jiri Location: Czech Republic Watch: 116610LN Posts: 78	312 ... my next watch I hope :)

8 April 2011, 06:39 AM	#104
psv "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: North America Posts: 11,062	Easy one - 233.

8 April 2011, 11:40 AM	#105
superb "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: anywhere but here Posts: 690	233 is my choice here.

9 April 2011, 09:36 AM	#106
Watch Fan "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: California Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 676	For me it's the 312.....just "has it all" for me. __________________ "The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheeze."

9 April 2011, 07:29 PM	#107
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,251	312 because I dislike the vertical power reseve indicator also. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

10 April 2011, 05:07 AM	#108
+SwissWatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Manila Posts: 32	looks: 233 special feature(PR): 233 cost: 312 movement: 312 case&bezel: 312 my vote: 312

16 April 2011, 11:34 PM	#109
hng "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: HaNgat Location: Jakarta Watch: Sports Rolex Posts: 648	You can buy 2 312 with a cost of 233 so I'll go gor 312 and 323 :) __________________ Cartier Tank / Suunto Stinger / 16014 / 16610LV / PAM 233 / 116520 / 14060M / 16710 / Omega Constellation

17 April 2011, 01:51 AM	#110
Fearsome Puppy "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Kevin Location: Kuala Lumpur Watch: SD4K Posts: 880	Though I own a 312 and not a 233, I'd vote for the 233... __________________ Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks -------------------------------------------------------------

17 April 2011, 11:03 AM	#111
heart82 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: near my PAM Watch: P-A-M. Posts: 146	233 for me!!! got one more hand!!!

19 April 2011, 12:14 PM	#115
SeanLandsnaes "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: South Florida Watch: Panerai Posts: 13,600	Both excellent watches but the 233 with the 8 days manual wind mvt and domed crystal cant be beat! For the money the 312 is a great buy....

19 April 2011, 12:31 PM	#116
flyinbrian 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Brian Location: AZ Watch: Rolex Posts: 858	I love the 233 but get by with my 352 :)

19 April 2011, 03:59 PM	#117
bcacncnc "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Bryan Location: Hong Kong Posts: 1,577	I have a 233, but I also think the 312 is a great! Both are great choices. __________________ Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko

19 April 2011, 04:38 PM	#118
TopNotchChach "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Near the Ocean! Watch: 116610 Posts: 1,253	312

19 April 2011, 08:30 PM	#119
sandybax "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Tim Location: Florida Watch: No-date Sub Posts: 289	312 for me. I love the simplicity of the dial, I love the "9" and I think that 233 dial is too busy. Having said that, I have to note that a more fair comparison would have been 320 vs 233 as both are GMTs, but even in that case I would vote for 320.

28 April 2011, 07:40 AM	#120
Tommysol "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: California Posts: 591	an amazing response to this post...thanks!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)