ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 January 2016, 03:35 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 153
|
Help with 93150 bracelet
Took delivery of a 1990 Tudor Sub with a folded oyster bracelet. I noticed the two folding "arms" for lack of a better term are not similarly curved.
This is the first watch I've owned with this style of bracelet so I have no reference for how much curve these two pieces should have. Photos show that the 12 o'clock one has more curvature than the 6 o'clock one. This is especially noticeable when the bracelet is folded (second photo), you can see the bottom to have more curve than the top. Also, my understanding is that people can bend these at home and modify the fit of the watch and how tight the clasp is. I also suspect this has something to do with why the clasp is "hanging" and not tight up against the bracelet. What's the proper amount of bend or curve these two pieces should have? Help me out, thanks! |
25 January 2016, 07:16 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,834
|
There is a post about how to adjust the "blades" in the reference section here on the forum.
http://www.rolexforums.com/showpost....82&postcount=8 Yours can definitely be improved upon, but these bracelets will always exhibit some "hanging" or slop at the back of the clasp area which, in my opinion, was never truly remedied until the 93250 bracelet was introduced with an interlocking divers extension. |
25 January 2016, 01:00 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
|
|
27 January 2016, 09:05 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Michigan USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 31
|
Hey Studial, that's what I do... I adjust to the band, then tighten up via micro adjusters in the clasp. I think most do it this way if you like a tight fit!
Z |
27 January 2016, 09:13 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,029
|
in my experience, adjusting my own for nearly 25 years, they are not meant to be curved the same.
the indication of them being correct is if the clasp closes firmly and stays closed. ps to adjust them, the only blade i have ever touched is the one attached to the clasp (not the bracelet), the blade attached to the bracelet is to be left alone or you will end up in a quagmire… giggity any bending should be very gentle and you must avoid creasing the blade at all costs.
__________________
|
28 January 2016, 07:56 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,659
|
I have never bent mine, think they are not slopped the same, so think yours is just fine!
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 Zenith 02.480.405 Henry Archer Eclipse 2FA security enabled |
29 January 2016, 05:13 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 153
|
Thanks for the feedback all.
It's impossible to know what the previous owner(s). I know that the clasp snaps in well, and the safety clasp also has a nice click and lock. All that I do know is that the Tudor branded piece (clasp?) with the micro-adjusters hangs down a fair bit on the bottom side. I don't know if this is due to the last (smallest) adjuster being selected or if it's due to overall stretch or both. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.