|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 November 2014, 07:13 AM
|
#31 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 20
|
is the co axial a lot thicker than non?
|
|
|
|
24 November 2014, 09:07 AM
|
#32 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,029
|
Yes, substantially so.
|
|
|
|
|
24 November 2014, 09:40 AM
|
#33 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
|
Friends don't let friends co-axial their Speedys.
|
|
|
|
|
24 November 2014, 09:45 AM
|
#34 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,029
|
I should add, though, that the 9300 variety is a phenomenal watch.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
