ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 June 2016, 12:25 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Ian
Location: NY
Watch: All of them
Posts: 3,245
|
Id rather the more discreet 5711r and then add a true PP chrono movement - 5070/5170.
__________________
Rolex, PPs, Breitling |
2 June 2016, 02:39 AM | #32 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,219
|
Quote:
|
|
2 June 2016, 04:31 AM | #33 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,300
|
The 5980/1R is a beast...as a stainless 5980 owner I would love to own the 5980/1R.
Love the dial. Love the weight. |
2 June 2016, 09:00 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,341
|
If the 5980/1R had the blue dial of the 5980/1AR, then it would be a killer looking watch. But until then, I like the simple dial of the 5711/1R.
|
2 June 2016, 11:29 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,721
|
|
2 June 2016, 11:36 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,341
|
5980 all day. That is the king of all gold watches.
|
2 June 2016, 01:16 PM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 791
|
5980 any day of the week and twice on Sunday's.
|
2 June 2016, 01:23 PM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
5711 all day, for its simplicity and elegance.
|
3 June 2016, 07:49 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 28
|
5711 more elegant
|
3 June 2016, 09:44 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
|
5711 is without question, more elegant. The 5980 is more sporty.
__________________
Patek Philippe Rolex |
25 July 2016, 03:18 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Southampton
Watch: Date Just ii
Posts: 169
|
Can anyone comment on what the 5980r is like to wear with shirts? Does it obstruct the cuff or does it fit underneath it? I know the 5711r would be fine. Just wondered what people who wear it everyday with a shirt think?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
25 July 2016, 07:54 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,294
|
You can wear both under a dress shirt IMO.
The 5711 is not as sporty as the 5980 but that's my opinion. JPS
__________________
Watches! |
25 July 2016, 09:02 AM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
I have the same problem, here is the answer! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
25 July 2016, 09:02 AM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Singapore
Watch: Patek 5146G
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
I've tried one before and had no issues with it slipping under the cuff. Then again, I get my shirts tailored and the left cuff is always a bit bigger than the right. I guess what I'm driving at is... get the 5980r and then get a shirt for the 5980, and not the other way around 😀 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
25 July 2016, 09:04 AM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Southampton
Watch: Date Just ii
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
I never thought of that! Lol. That's certainly a way around watches that sit high on the wrist. Hats off to your creativity Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
25 July 2016, 09:18 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Bryant
Location: Florida
Watch: ...Your Thoughts
Posts: 2,171
|
^^5980 is a beauty, saw it at the AD for the first time a week ago.
If you can afford it and don't mind the heft, I would say go for it and get your shirts tailored right, I mean left...LOL !! |
25 July 2016, 10:11 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Louis
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: PP 5131R
Posts: 4,764
|
The pics in this thread...so tasty!
|
25 July 2016, 10:29 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
I'm a chrono fan, so the 5980/1r over the 5711... And the DEF over the Platona.
|
25 July 2016, 10:48 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 623
|
5980. No contest in my opinion.
|
25 July 2016, 02:26 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,466
|
5711
|
25 July 2016, 03:38 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
5711 more dressy and elegant, 5980 more sporty, hard to compare as they are so different, just for the weight I would rake the 5711
|
27 July 2016, 12:30 AM | #52 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
spending 50k on a gold watch that just tells the time (and simple date function) is a pretty bold statement. the 5711 isn't flashy, its not big, it doesn't have loads of bells and whistles.. it just tells the time and STILL costs a bomb, certainly relative to other time-only watches. compare that to the 5980.. chrono space is significantly more complex, and yet the price of the 5980 is just 50% more than the 'vanilla' 5711. makes me think if price is no issue, and you want to make a statement, the 5711 is the way to go. 50k for a time only. nobody / not much in the modern patek range can mess with that. if you want to get into chrono's on the other hand, the 5980 may not stand up / or are only on par with, some of the other patek models. just a thought.. as i think a lot of people tend to simply spring for the most expensive model in absolute terms because they assume more expensive must be better. (not saying thats what the honourable people on this forum think.. just thats a popular impression out there amongst others!!) |
|
27 July 2016, 01:35 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: NJ
Posts: 25
|
|
27 July 2016, 02:21 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: usofmfa
Posts: 3,157
|
5711 for moi, but both are classic.
__________________
Instagram: soundsoserious |
28 July 2016, 02:00 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: London, UK
Watch: Patek 5170j
Posts: 64
|
Forgive me in advance, it's not my intention to offend. I find that the 5980 is big, chunky, not slim enough, and as a result a not discreet. It really is blingy and especially so in "R" metal.
It's so big that that the Nautilus "elegance" is lost. It becomes an out and out sports watch. The beauty of the 5711 (and 5712) are that they are slim enough to be elegant - you could actually wear a 5711r with a suit and it would look great poking out from under a shirt cuff, especially if you have a tan. The 5980R is a bit AP for me. And sorry gents once more, I really dislike AP and the whole ROO thing is all bit naff. Just my worthless 2c. |
28 July 2016, 02:43 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
|
5980 is one of the best sport watches ever. And, the bracelet is about the best in the business.
|
28 July 2016, 05:16 AM | #57 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,747
|
|
28 July 2016, 07:11 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Mansour
Location: KWT
Posts: 147
|
5711 for me but the 5980 is a stunning watch.
|
28 July 2016, 07:18 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,176
|
Is that the 2016 Basel release of the 5140p in your Avatar? Do you own it?
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
28 July 2016, 03:07 PM | #60 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.