SeaDweller a better choice vs Sub now???

[Simon_jrees]

Originally Posted by Dougiebaby

Now that the 126___ & 126___ Subs are commanding nutso prices, do you consider the 126600 SD as a better option? It has same movement as 126___ Sub, it has a “red line”, and, generally speaking, is the more capable piece. I also think most would see it as the more attractive watch.

Interestingly, I was in Rome September 2019 wearing my 114060 and I bumped into a guy wearing the new SD and I have to admit ... it was a better looking watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In the end it's down to the preference of the wearer, providing they're buying to wear and not invest/collect a rare or sought after piece.

[DoctorA]

The SD43 is an anniversary watch
It’s better engineered
Not that most people would go the depth but it has better water resistance
Right now it’s the less expensive watch

2mm difference is only a mental thing and wouldn’t really be that big of a deal or difference between the two watches

[slus]

Originally Posted by Smobews

we are a fierce, large wristed bunch

Really though, I do see the new Sub cutting in to the SD43 demand a little bit. Anyone remember the price difference between the Submariner Date and 40mm SD and SD4k years ago? I forget exactly, but it seemed significant from what I remember. Not that many people sprung for the 40mm SD over the 40mm Sub, some would languish in the case for years before all the hype hit. But it won't be like that, they'll both sell before they hit the case for the foreseeable future.

Edit: I was incorrect, not a large difference. Who wouldn't have got the Sea Dweller?!

[Marcjvr]

Modern Sea-Dweller is for the giants who live amongst us normal sized folk

[SearChart]

I'd pick a SD over a sub, but not the 43mm one.

[Deep18]

SeaDweller every single time.

[Deep18]

Originally Posted by Marcjvr

Modern Sea-Dweller is for the giants who live amongst us normal sized folk

And I get it’s a bigger piece but I’m 6’, 185 lbs, not quite a giant.

[Smobews]

Originally Posted by Deep18

And I get it’s a bigger piece but I’m 6’, 185 lbs, not quite a giant.

You are, when you take the world’s population averages.

[LDN]

I prefer seadweller!

[FTX I]

I think it's the best choice for those who prefer the SD.

[RustyW]

Edit: I was incorrect, not a large difference. Who wouldn't have got the Sea Dweller?!



When I got my first SD in 2003, the difference was $100 I think!! I think the sub was $4k and Sea Dweller was $4,100!!

[slus]

Originally Posted by RustyW

Edit: I was incorrect, not a large difference. Who wouldn't have got the Sea Dweller?!



When I got my first SD in 2003, the difference was $100 I think!! I think the sub was $4k and Sea Dweller was $4,100!!

Wow! Easy sell. I tried on a Submariner and SD4K in probably 2014, and I remember thinking it was a pretty big step up in price. The dealer even offered a discount on the SD4K back then to get the price closer and make a sale, where is my time machine! I bought my Pelagos that day.

$9100 vs $11700 now. 2600 would make me think twice... and then purchase the SD43 anyway.

[Triumph_1200]

The red text, matte dial, and coherent proportions drove my swap from the Sub date. Easily as comfy as the sub and I tend to wear my watches on the loose side. Not a dig on the sub, I’d buy another - but not at these prices. The SD is a bargain comparatively.

[jakemiller69]

Just picked up my 43mm today. Though I have a Hulk and Gold Sub, this felt almost near the same wrist presence as my Gold Sub and liked the price point with black dial.

I am happy to have it in my rotation!

[Smobews]

wayyyy fewer sdz in the wild; makes them a little more special

[Rashid.bk]

Originally Posted by abozz

SD43 is a treasure! And my choice, the new SubC is a BEAUTY, but a little bit more special is the sd43 for me

Enviado desde mi SM-G975F mediante Tapatalk

I agree, would just have to see about the caseback on SD43, that would be the deciding factor for me.
A two tone SD43 would be sweet.

[Rado63]

I would choose the new SUB, It's got better visibility of the dial and new hands. The new SUB is also thinner than the SD43. The SD43 as a dive watch, the dial is too small, the hands are too small watch is too thick. I have the SD43, but if I was choosing today I think I would get the SUB for these reasons.

[trout_thumper21]

Originally Posted by Dougiebaby

I believe the prices of SD are similar/same/less than Subs now. So for similar price, which would you choose?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Just received my SD43 and absolutely love it. Always felt that Subs wore a little small on my wrist, and the SD43 was a great sweet spot between the Sub and DSSD. Zero discomfort whatsoever.

The SD43 ended up costing just a few hundred more than the Sub+tax would have set me back at MSRP, so it was an easy choice for me.

I love the heft, red text, and matte black dial. Easily one of the best Rolex references for those with the wrists to rock it IMHO

[Linuxpenguins]

Get the best of both! Buy a SD4k 116600 - Look it up! :)

[ramitimeout]

the SD43 is better, its not that much bigger! it looks better, and its technically superior with a higher depth rating and a helium escape valave! i always wondered why the sub is was always more popular!

[Deppe]

I am sure the OP was waiting 3+ years for further input before making his decision.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by Deppe

I am sure the OP was waiting 3+ years for further input before making his decision.