ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 June 2017, 07:14 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 56
|
1665 Great White or Maxi 5513
Hi,
I'm conflicted on which watch to pick up. I like them both but thinking the 1665 is a better example but obviously pricier. Any input would be much appreciated! 1665: http://www.chrono24.com/rolex/1979-m...-id6394561.htm 5513 Maxi Mk3: http://www.chrono24.com/rolex/1979-m...-id6405738.htm Best, JG |
9 June 2017, 11:28 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pleasant Mount Pa
Posts: 62
|
Don't know much about either of them from a collectors perspective, but I sure like that 5513.
|
9 June 2017, 12:22 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,789
|
The 5513 is nice, but it looks like it has a service insert and crystal. Nothing wrong with that, but worth noting.
The 1665 looks nice too, and I'd go with the SD if I had the extra cash. Very different watches on the wrist, so it's a matter of personal preference. I'd research here: http://www.drsd.com/watch-info/white...eadweller.html |
9 June 2017, 12:27 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,356
|
Interesting..I own a mk3 5513 and a mk1 1665 lol...so my favorites. This is going to be a hard pick...but if money allows I think nice 1665s are a bit harder to come by....both very comfortable though imo.
|
9 June 2017, 12:39 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 56
|
1665
Yes. I am leaning towards the 1665. Didn't realize the 5513 had service insert. I've tried on a 1665 and doesn't feel too big. This looks great and hopefully all original!
JG |
9 June 2017, 09:06 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: japan
Watch: 1655 Great White
Posts: 147
|
I just bough a 1665 and am loving it, I think 1665 Great White's were only made for 3 or 4 years which makes it more rare than the 5513, if you have the money, I would recommend the 1665.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 June 2017, 09:07 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: japan
Watch: 1655 Great White
Posts: 147
|
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 June 2017, 09:10 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,587
|
Well according to the advert., the 5513 is only good to 30 meters, so I'd pass on that one
|
9 June 2017, 09:37 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: newcastle
Posts: 342
|
Have both and for me the 1665 is much better, just feels that little more substantial but whatever you choose you should be happy.
|
9 June 2017, 11:26 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 56
|
|
10 June 2017, 08:39 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,649
|
I would pick the 1665
|
10 June 2017, 01:26 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
I dont recomend benwatch at all
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo |
11 June 2017, 06:19 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: IT/FR/NL
Watch: DRSD/RedSuB/COMEX
Posts: 431
|
Great White :)
[IMG][/IMG]
__________________
SUB: 16800 Ghost Bezel; 1680 200 RedSub; 16610LV FAT 4 (Y) NOS; 16610LV FAT 4 (F) NOS; 16610LV FAT 4 (F) NOS / EXP: I 14270; I Freccione 1655; SD: 16660 Triple 6; 1665 Submariner 2000-DRSD; 1665 Great White MKI; 116600 SD4K NOS (2); 116660 DSSD MKI; 16600 Sommozzatori Polipetto NOS; 16600 NOS; (2) 126600 SD43 NOS; 16600 COMEX NOS / DAYTONA: 116500 NOS (4); 16520 Zenith (6) NOS; 116520 (5) NOS; P.P+++ |
14 June 2017, 10:41 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: japan
Watch: 1655 Great White
Posts: 147
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.