Fishy serial # engraving?

[037]

Originally Posted by springer

Look at the Es in stainless steel - typical fake engraving. This is not a genuine engraving by any stretch of the imagination.

Additionally, original 2,2 million serial numbered cases read REGISTERED DESIGN not ORIG ROLEX DESIGN.

Agreed on all points but has anyone said this is an original 2.2M case? The overwhelming consensus is that it's not. My question is if this could possibly be an altered service case, hence the discrepancy on the serial number side.

If it's a 100% fake case then that's fine, but it's a good one if so.

[swish77]

Originally Posted by 037

Agreed on all points but has anyone said this is an original 2.2M case? The overwhelming consensus is that it's not. My question is if this could possibly be an altered service case, hence the discrepancy on the serial number side.

If it's a 100% fake case then that's fine, but it's a good one if so.

I wouldn’t call this a “good” fake. This one is easily spotted as such.

[037]

Originally Posted by swish77

I wouldn’t call this a “good” fake. This one is easily spotted as such.

Fair enough, but why did Heywood only say the numbers looked incorrect with no mention of the other engravings or the case itself?

I don't disagree. I'm just confused as to the lack of clarity in his response.

[77T]

I understood HM’s point without parsing the language.

Steer clear...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[1665fan]

Re engraved....fake engraved....real case fake engraved....it’s BS it’s trash...if it’s original case it has been ruined with fake engravings

[037]

Originally Posted by 77T

I understood HM’s point without parsing the language.

Steer clear...

I didn't which is why I'm asking a genuine question and genuinely curious. How else does one learn otherwise?

So, is it a genuine case that's been re-engraved or a completely fake case? That's what I'm curious about.

[springer]

Originally Posted by 037

Agreed on all points but has anyone said this is an original 2.2M case? The overwhelming consensus is that it's not. My question is if this could possibly be an altered service case, hence the discrepancy on the serial number side.

If it's a 100% fake case then that's fine, but it's a good one if so.

If it is altered it is not original. If it isn't original it is fake.

[crowncollection]

No good


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[T4ME]

AD= Trusted Seller