|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 September 2018, 01:48 AM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
14790 ST and the 2225 movement
I would like to know the quality of the 14790ST compared to the most modern Royal Oak. Case, bracelet ...
And the 2225 movement is less reliable than the 3120? |
|
|
|
9 September 2018, 03:55 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 September 2018, 05:20 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 27
|
I have two 14790ST, one of them since more then 12 years. It‘s ohne of my favorite daily „beaters“, very precise and still waterproof to 50 meters without having been overhauled since the purchase. Compared to my 15202 (from 2011) and my 5402 it‘s the RO most qualified for daily wearing.
The 2225 is based on a JLC 889 -a beautiful and highly reliable movement. I have several watches with the JLC 889 and never had a problem with it. |
|
|
|
|
9 September 2018, 10:51 PM
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
As for quality, is it worse than the modern Royal Oak?
|
|
|
|
|
11 September 2018, 06:58 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 27
|
it depends on your definition of „quality“. The answer is „no“ with regard to precision, reliability and stability of value. The bracelet and case are slimmer, which I find more elegant, „AP-style“ and thus more preferable...
|
|
|
|
|
11 September 2018, 09:13 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Las Vegas NV
Watch: 14060M COSC
Posts: 1,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 September 2018, 02:34 PM
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Very pretty
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
