ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

advent · 14 September 2016, 02:30 AM

Other post was closed, is this 100% fake? You can see through the han as that was the only reasoning i Saw in other thread.

http://imgur.com/a/N2tKp

GLADIATOR · 14 September 2016, 09:42 AM

Not convinced that is genuine either.
Far better photos of the dial and rehaut needed to access.
But I have doubts.
Adam

AbsolutelyROLEX! · 14 September 2016, 12:59 PM

Looks good here, you can tell its 18k gold not plated

Chewbacca · 14 September 2016, 02:59 PM

no sale.

crowncollection · 14 September 2016, 06:57 PM

Need better pics mate of all the markings on the case and band and of course a clear dial shot

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CLTRolex · 17 September 2016, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by advent

Other post was closed, is this 100% fake? You can see through the han as that was the only reasoning i Saw in other thread.

http://imgur.com/a/N2tKp

I'd like some more clarification on why people think this looks fake. I've looked closely and everything looks good...both in this picture and the closed thread referenced/created by OP. Here is the other picture posted
IMG_0942.JPG

GLADIATOR · 17 September 2016, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robcassell

I'd like some more clarification on why people think this looks fake. I've looked closely and everything looks good...both in this picture and the closed thread referenced/created by OP. Here is the other picture posted

Not sure we did.
WE asked for better photos

First was surely fake

CLTRolex · 17 September 2016, 01:09 PM

The OP is saying it's the same watch. The only thing that looks wrong (if I have to nit pick) is the "YACHT-MASTER" font. What specifically screams fake in the photo?

GLADIATOR · 17 September 2016, 01:12 PM

not the same watch???

CLTRolex · 17 September 2016, 01:17 PM

I think OP is saying it's the same watch - at least they look the same. Bottom line - and please feel free to PM me - but tell what make screams fake about the watch.

5EC228AD-703B-4D15-9292-3F9AC51F0370.jpg

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GLADIATOR · 17 September 2016, 01:18 PM

they do not look the same to me.
And I (personally) do not post counterfeit issues
sorry

CLTRolex · 17 September 2016, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GLADIATOR

And I (personally) do not post counterfeit issues
sorry

I can respect this.

14 September 2016, 02:30 AM	#1
advent "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Location: nc Posts: 2	Yachmaster 2 check Other post was closed, is this 100% fake? You can see through the han as that was the only reasoning i Saw in other thread. http://imgur.com/a/N2tKp

14 September 2016, 09:42 AM	#2
GLADIATOR "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Costa Blanca, Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA Posts: 5,288	Not convinced that is genuine either. Far better photos of the dial and rehaut needed to access. But I have doubts. Adam __________________ The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."

14 September 2016, 12:59 PM	#3
AbsolutelyROLEX! "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: AKA: ANDERL712000 Posts: 4,935	Looks good here, you can tell its 18k gold not plated __________________ We want to be the first in the field and Rolex should be seen as the one and only-the best. Hans Wilsdorf, Rolex founder

14 September 2016, 06:57 PM	#5
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,157	Need better pics mate of all the markings on the case and band and of course a clear dial shot Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

17 September 2016, 01:09 PM	#8
CLTRolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Real Name: Robert Location: Charlotte/London Watch: Multiple Posts: 889	The OP is saying it's the same watch. The only thing that looks wrong (if I have to nit pick) is the "YACHT-MASTER" font. What specifically screams fake in the photo? __________________ ♕ Daytona - 116506 ♕ GMT-Master II - 116710BLNR ♕ Yacht-Master II - 116680 ♕ Daytona - 116520 ♕ Explorer II - 16570

14 September 2016, 02:59 PM	#4
Chewbacca Banned Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: CJ Location: Kashyyyk Watch: Kessel Run Chrono Posts: 21,113	no sale.

17 September 2016, 01:12 PM	#9
GLADIATOR "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Costa Blanca, Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA Posts: 5,288	not the same watch??? __________________ The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."

17 September 2016, 01:17 PM	#10
CLTRolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Real Name: Robert Location: Charlotte/London Watch: Multiple Posts: 889	I think OP is saying it's the same watch - at least they look the same. Bottom line - and please feel free to PM me - but tell what make screams fake about the watch. 5EC228AD-703B-4D15-9292-3F9AC51F0370.jpg Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ ♕ Daytona - 116506 ♕ GMT-Master II - 116710BLNR ♕ Yacht-Master II - 116680 ♕ Daytona - 116520 ♕ Explorer II - 16570

17 September 2016, 01:18 PM	#11
GLADIATOR "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Costa Blanca, Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA Posts: 5,288	they do not look the same to me. And I (personally) do not post counterfeit issues sorry __________________ The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)