The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 May 2016, 06:28 AM   #1
Jcy90
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: New York
Watch: GMT & SUB
Posts: 703
Heavy 5 digit reference love on the forum! Why?

Good Afternoon. I am a 5 digit owner. Absolutely love my GMT 16710. I think the Pepsi GMT is one of the most beautiful Rolex's a man can own. But from now on I will be solely purchasing 6 digit models, love the upgrades. The newer watches feel much sturdier and of a much higher build quality. (Not taking anything away from the 5 digit models which have stood the test of time and are all icons) Would love to know why my fellow members lust after the 5 digit models over the 6? Thanks!
Jcy90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 07:10 AM   #2
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
You need to own both and make your own decision. Simple as that. I love/own both. Each has pros/cons.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 07:32 AM   #3
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
Watches are already an anachronism, so I don't see much point in pursuing technical upgrades. Plus, I prefer the lighter/sleeker bracelets and the aesthetics of the 5 series (and lower.) The 6 series is too flashy, bold and Omega-like for me, rather than being subtle with more of a vintage vibe like the 5 series.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 07:36 AM   #4
Steve36Efc
"TRF" Member
 
Steve36Efc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wales
Watch: 126603
Posts: 2,606
I really like both, my first was a 16710 Gmt 2, which I thought I'd have for ever. But since buying a 114060 in 2012 it basically became redundant, I still loved the look but the more solid feel of the 6 digit models just grabbed me, I have recently flipped the 16710 In favour of a 116610LV. I don't see any more 5 digit models in my future. Here's a nice side by side of my 16710 and BLNR
image.jpg
Steve36Efc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 07:45 AM   #5
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve36Efc View Post
I really like both, my first was a 16710 Gmt 2, which I thought I'd have for ever. But since buying a 114060 in 2012 it basically became redundant, I still loved the look but the more solid feel of the 6 digit models just grabbed me, I have recently flipped the 16710 In favour of a 116610LV. I don't see any more 5 digit models in my future. Here's a nice side by side of my 16710 and BLNR
Attachment 741425
It's a bit like comparing the following. The new one is fantastic and a technological leap, but I'd pick the old one all day:


douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 07:48 AM   #6
mtgjr
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
Watches are already an anachronism, so I don't see much point in pursuing technical upgrades. Plus, I prefer the lighter/sleeker bracelets and the aesthetics of the 5 series (and lower.) The 6 series is too flashy, bold and Omega-like for me, rather than being subtle with more of a vintage vibe like the 5 series.
This
mtgjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 07:52 AM   #7
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,546
^^ But they are both Porsches and both awesome.

For me, for both Porsche and Rolex, I prefer new/recent. When comparing 5 and 6 digit references, 6 will almost always win (GMT being the exception). 4 vs 6? That's more difficult..
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 07:54 AM   #8
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,633
The only improved 'feel' of sturdiness I notice in the newer models is the bracelets.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 07:58 AM   #9
Ckci
"TRF" Member
 
Ckci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Russell
Location: KC, MO
Watch: FedEx 4 next 1
Posts: 2,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
It's a bit like comparing the following. The new one is fantastic and a technological leap, but I'd pick the old one all day:


Me too!
image.jpg
('97 air cooled 911TT w/23,237 miles).
And I like the vintage Rolex watches more too for their beauty and history!
Ckci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 07:59 AM   #10
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,853
I think you'll see a different kind of love for 4 digits if you went to the Vintage threads. So the impression one gets is based on where you habitually linger here.
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 08:00 AM   #11
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
^^ But they are both Porsches and both awesome.

For me, for both Porsche and Rolex, I prefer new/recent. When comparing 5 and 6 digit references, 6 will almost always win (GMT being the exception). 4 vs 6? That's more difficult..
Yeah, I guess we all draw our own line in the sand. I drew mine with the electric steering and larger size of the 981/991, while others draw theirs at air cooled engines, and others still may draw their line at the new turbo engines. So, for me, the 5 series Rolex and the 987/997 series Porsche are the end of the road. I have no interest in upgrading my Sub, and, if I ever want to upgrade my Porsche, I may have to look at Lotus. Actually, I'll probably go older with my next Porsche, just like many 5 series users often go to 4 series and older.

FWIW, I'm surprised the polls in the other thread came out with the 5 series a little ahead. Based on comments, I would have thought the 6 series would kill the 5 series in favor. I guess it's because new 6 series buyers post more frequently.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 08:01 AM   #12
speedolex
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,231


Two reasons. First, the 5 digits are in the very recent past, most forum members own these in significant numbers more than any 4 digit or 6 digit reference.

Second, the Sport 6's look too bulky to me, in fact, when I wear my 1016 or 1601 for a week and then put my 16610 back on it feels gigantic, couldn't imagine anything bigger. The trend for humongous, oversized watches is nearing its end and the boxy Sport 6's are going to be forever associated with that short trend and not in a good way.
speedolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 08:01 AM   #13
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ckci View Post
And I like the vintage Rolex watches more too for their beauty and history!
Oh man, congrats on such a beauty. My next will likely be a 911sc or 3.2 Carrera, but a Turbo is bonkers!
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 08:11 AM   #14
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack T View Post
The only improved 'feel' of sturdiness I notice in the newer models is the bracelets.
Bracelets, case everything different Jack.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 08:13 AM   #15
Steve36Efc
"TRF" Member
 
Steve36Efc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wales
Watch: 126603
Posts: 2,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
It's a bit like comparing the following. The new one is fantastic and a technological leap, but I'd pick the old one all day:


It's the same with cars, I appreciate both new and old, but out of those two I'd pick the new.
Steve36Efc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 08:17 AM   #16
kirksingleton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,759
I think it is a play on retro without paying vintage prices.
kirksingleton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 08:18 AM   #17
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Most important thing on 6 digit Subs for me is more removable links at 6 o'clock. Now I can adjust the bracelet (small wrists) and this is something huge.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 08:27 AM   #18
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTX I View Post
Most important thing on 6 digit Subs for me is more removable links at 6 o'clock. Now I can adjust the bracelet (small wrists) and this is something huge.
To be fair, removing permanent links isn't a big deal.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 08:45 AM   #19
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
To be fair, removing permanent links isn't a big deal.
Agree on 14060, SD and GMT but not on Sub date. Those will have a visible gap but it works. The Sub date has 4 + 1/2 and if you remove one permanent there will be 3 + 1/2 and it's too short.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 09:14 AM   #20
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
My spidey-sense tells me that this one has probably been done to death on this and other watch forums.

My reason for preferring the four and five digit references to the six digit ones is that the older ones look like Rolexes to me, and the new ones look like tasteless bling. That's all.
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 09:21 AM   #21
strafer_kid
"TRF" Member
 
strafer_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
You need to own both and make your own decision. Simple as that. I love/own both. Each has pros/cons.
Would agree - pros and cons with both. Little doubt that the six digit models enjoy the latest technology and construction methods but they are not for everyone. Have tried nearly all the six digit sports models and ended up retaining only the SubC. The rest are all four or five digits. Great thing is though that you can still pick up some very nice five digit models that were still in production well into the 2000s so they are still well up to date.
strafer_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 09:23 AM   #22
sickened1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
sickened1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 8,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jcy90 View Post
Would love to know why?
Why not?


What's not to love. Classic size case (more proportionate), customizeable (try changing bezel on the ceramic model), etc.
sickened1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 09:23 AM   #23
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
Many here fell in love with Rolex years ago.
The Maxi Dial and Case is just not we care about.
For us, I hope I'm not speaking out of turn, Vintage is more important.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 09:27 AM   #24
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,180
I love them both for different reasons. I can't imagine having only one or the other, there's a place for both in my collection.

DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 09:29 AM   #25
joli160
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,385
I really prefer the 6 digit, having 2 five digit and 3 six ones, the difference is huge in favour of the 6.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 09:48 AM   #26
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
Why is the difference huge in favour of the 6?

The opposite is true, IMO. Aesthetically, there seems to be a "disconnect" between watch case (huge) and bracelet (slim) which once seen, cannot be unseen. And that kills it.
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 10:04 AM   #27
Timesurfer
"TRF" Member
 
Timesurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 12,000+ Lakes!
Watch: 16710 Daytona BLNR
Posts: 840
Not sure, there seems to be a certain nostalgia brewing in favour of the ¨old School¨ Cases... Dials, etc.
Timesurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 10:08 AM   #28
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,505
I am also in the "need both" camp. Both hot for different reasons and if you sell one, you will miss it guaranteed.







red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 10:09 AM   #29
KG0003
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 29
5 digit just fits my wrist better. 6 digit always feels top heavy when on the wrist.
KG0003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2016, 10:11 AM   #30
Daytona88
2024 Pledge Member
 
Daytona88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5712
Posts: 2,599
A lot of people cannot deal with the larger lugs. It does seem a little less proportionate but more so in photos than on the wrist, IMO.
Daytona88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.