The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 April 2013, 08:20 AM   #31
shofzr
"TRF" Member
 
shofzr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Dallas
Watch: 218235 BronzeWaves
Posts: 760
So no one has noticed the stainless steel Yacht Master II has caliber 4161 while all other Yacht Master II's have caliber 4160 ? :)
__________________
Sea-Dweller 16600
Day-Date II 218235
Cellinum 5240/6
Speedmaster 125
shofzr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 08:45 AM   #32
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by shofzr View Post
So no one has noticed the stainless steel Yacht Master II has caliber 4161 while all other Yacht Master II's have caliber 4160 ? :)
This is an interesting point, but relatively minor and it goes to marketing..

Rolex made some minor changes in the 3185 to come up with a 3186 and marketed it heavily... Some think that it is the greatest thing since sliced cheese, but, in the end, the changes are so minor there is zero functional difference..

Rolex put a parachrom hairspring and paraflex shock system in the new Explorer 39, but didn't market the "new" 3132 movement and so it gets no fanfare.. The 3186 was put in the Explorer II for the last 4 years of production and not a peep from anybody, Rolex or otherwise..

All of the 3135 equipped Rolex now have Parachrom - but no marketing back-up..

Marketing can make simple changes earth-shaking and push demand where it really isn't otherwise warranted..

It's likely that the SS YM II sports the paraflex shock system and the WG and YG models do too... A missed marketing door for the Rolex PR department..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 09:19 AM   #33
FNFZ4
2024 Pledge Member
 
FNFZ4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Alfred
Location: DC Metro
Watch: None
Posts: 29,368
looks like the theme for Rolex this year is BLUE
__________________
NEED PC HELP? ASK HERE!

Watches:
Patek 5205G | Patek 5167A | 16613 Serti | 116718 Green | 216570 Black | 16700 Pepsi

Wish list:
Patek 5726/1 | AP RG Ceramic | Patek 5712 | Patek 5130
FNFZ4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 09:21 AM   #34
snowpea
"TRF" Member
 
snowpea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Steven
Location: Jazoom
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 1,092
I do loved this model, just hoping the price is reasonable.
__________________
snowpea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 11:22 AM   #35
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
This is an interesting point, but relatively minor and it goes to marketing..

Rolex made some minor changes in the 3185 to come up with a 3186 and marketed it heavily... Some think that it is the greatest thing since sliced cheese, but, in the end, the changes are so minor there is zero functional difference..

Rolex put a parachrom hairspring and paraflex shock system in the new Explorer 39, but didn't market the "new" 3132 movement and so it gets no fanfare.. The 3186 was put in the Explorer II for the last 4 years of production and not a peep from anybody, Rolex or otherwise..

All of the 3135 equipped Rolex now have Parachrom - but no marketing back-up..

Marketing can make simple changes earth-shaking and push demand where it really isn't otherwise warranted..

It's likely that the SS YM II sports the paraflex shock system and the WG and YG models do too... A missed marketing door for the Rolex PR department..
Tools, interesting perspective and makes me chuckle a little at the many haters who insist Rolex only has the status it has due to unrelenting marketing.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 11:29 AM   #36
mvmbles
"TRF" Member
 
mvmbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Nick
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by sohail View Post
I have a small wrist. Does it look overly big to you guys?
My opinion is a resounding YES, but who cares what I think? If you're happy then wear it proudly.

I suppose I should wait until I see it in the flesh to pass judgement, but at 44mm I can't say I've ever been interested in the Yachtmaster II.
mvmbles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 11:52 AM   #37
DJJon
"TRF" Member
 
DJJon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
Just think how all the current White Gold owners must feel right now.

The YM II Franchise just got knocked a peg in status. Pure and simple.

The Dinghy Master.
DJJon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 01:22 PM   #38
mlotus95
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pa
Watch: GMT master II
Posts: 600
love the look of this watch
mlotus95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 04:53 PM   #39
HRV
"TRF" Member
 
HRV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: johannesburg
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 4,407
I could be wrong and it's all down to the lighting used in the press release photos, but does the new SS bezel and hands look like a lighter shade of blue than the TT and YG versions?
HRV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 05:01 PM   #40
johnbeth
"TRF" Member
 
johnbeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by sohail View Post
If the Msrp is around 16K i will buy this watch.

Me too... or wait to precious metal models to come down dramatically...

johnbeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 05:39 PM   #41
Bangel
"TRF" Member
 
Bangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJJon View Post
Just think how all the current White Gold owners must feel right now.

The YM II Franchise just got knocked a peg in status. Pure and simple.

The Dinghy Master.
It would be a shame if any WG owners felt the way you're alluding to.

Do WG owners really wear their watches because they want others to instantly recognise they're wearing something expensive on their wrist?

What does it matter if the same watch comes in a SS version??

Would it really detract from the enjoyment of wearing a WG watch???

I like to think not.
Bangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 05:53 PM   #42
johnbeth
"TRF" Member
 
johnbeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bangel View Post
It would be a shame if any WG owners felt the way you're alluding to.

Do WG owners really wear their watches because they want others to instantly recognise they're wearing something expensive on their wrist?

What does it matter if the same watch comes in a SS version??

Would it really detract from the enjoyment of wearing a WG watch???

I like to think not.
Don't worry about his comments. He has been bashing YMII non stop in all threads.

People buy watches that they like the look and feel, what the metal is, who cares?

johnbeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 08:52 PM   #43
steveclocks
"TRF" Member
 
steveclocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Geert
Location: Belgium
Watch: rolex/JLC/panerai
Posts: 5,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by sohail View Post
I have a small wrist. Does it look overly big to you guys?
No man! Not to big at all, it looks perfect !
steveclocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 08:54 PM   #44
myjianrong
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Qatar, Singapore
Posts: 72
I really like this new model..why don't they put date? it will be perfect for me..
myjianrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 09:48 PM   #45
alanc
"TRF" Member
 
alanc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Alan
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 114270 16710B
Posts: 1,062
I think I finally understand the YM II.

When I first saw it (in photos and at the AD) I was reminded of the the gaudy cheap tin toys made in Japan in the 1960's (yes, in the 60's that was where junk came from) - it looked to me like a cheap Japanese toy rendering of a luxury watch.

However, if you put it in the context of where its name suggests it belongs - a regatta at an exclusive marina where everyone is wearing bright Ralph Lauren red, white and blue stripes with khaki or white pants and shorts with boat shoes - it fits in perfectly. Just looking at it now I smell salt air and feel a sea breeze. Think of the character played by Ted Knight in Caddyshack - it would look just right on his wrist.

Granted that's a pretty narrow use, but I think the YM II works fine as a summer watch for casual wear generally. Like white, though, I think it gets put away after Labor Day...
alanc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 09:50 PM   #46
tom2517
"TRF" Member
 
tom2517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,550
I don't think SS version will depress the sales of the WG version.

Daytona and other series have WG version for years, people who want WG will still buy them, even if there are SS versions available.

WG has more shine and heft, it will make you feel special and at the same time understated.

If submariner have a platinum version, I will definitely save up for one.
tom2517 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 10:19 PM   #47
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
it's a mostly useless watch, i don't see how this could become collectible but can appreciate the movement which to some would be value adding

it's one that would be interesting to own for a while. i'll snap one up when they come down to the £10k range

can't wait for it to hit the shelves
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 10:40 PM   #48
Alpino
"TRF" Member
 
Alpino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Paris
Posts: 2,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
This is an interesting point, but relatively minor and it goes to marketing..

Rolex made some minor changes in the 3185 to come up with a 3186 and marketed it heavily... Some think that it is the greatest thing since sliced cheese, but, in the end, the changes are so minor there is zero functional difference..

Rolex put a parachrom hairspring and paraflex shock system in the new Explorer 39, but didn't market the "new" 3132 movement and so it gets no fanfare.. The 3186 was put in the Explorer II for the last 4 years of production and not a peep from anybody, Rolex or otherwise..

All of the 3135 equipped Rolex now have Parachrom - but no marketing back-up..

Marketing can make simple changes earth-shaking and push demand where it really isn't otherwise warranted..

It's likely that the SS YM II sports the paraflex shock system and the WG and YG models do too... A missed marketing door for the Rolex PR department..

I don't agree with your analyse regarding 3185/3186 evolution. It's not a simple marketing change, there's functional evolutions. Just try crown test to see it.
They modified some parts in it (wheel, springs, main plate, bridges ...), and added parachrom.

We can discuss on the importance of that, but it's there.


Regarding 4161 I don't know yet what the evolution is, but it is not the paraflex. It's not in it.
And yes, we can assume 4161 will be put in all YM2 begining now.
Alpino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 April 2013, 11:43 PM   #49
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by sohail View Post
Would any one of you sell the full 18kt YG gold to buy this? i simply do not wear the YG as much since i have an 18Kt GMT (which i dont wear much) & i have a DD II rose (which i dont wear much)
no it has become my daily wearer

but in your case it may be a good idea. I have found I dont were my YG sub or GMT that much, or even the RG Daytona so everyone is different!!
For me once I started wearing the YM II I really liked the 44 mm size!

as for the wrist size mine is 6.5 inches and fits to me great!








tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2013, 12:03 AM   #50
roadking40
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Bill
Location: PHX AZ
Watch: DSSD,Yacht I, II
Posts: 102
Love it. The size is perfect. Nice collection btw, the white face really pops out.
roadking40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2013, 12:18 AM   #51
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by sohail View Post
I have a small wrist. Does it look overly big to you guys?
I have small wrists too, so I understand your position. I think it looks large, but not outside what would be considered reasonable today. If standards change back towards the historical norm, then it would probably be too large.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2013, 03:29 AM   #52
fishingbear
2024 Pledge Member
 
fishingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,384
Not for me; although I certainly appreciate the brilliant movement.
I feel the same about this model as I always have about the Daytona: Way too busy on the dial especially not to have a date.
fishingbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2013, 01:23 PM   #53
SohAIS
⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 DATEJUST41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
SohAIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Aamir
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Watch: Patek, Rolex
Posts: 31,923
Tom that is a great collection. I love the YMIi shot with the Porsche keys.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
no it has become my daily wearer

but in your case it may be a good idea. I have found I dont were my YG sub or GMT that much, or even the RG Daytona so everyone is different!!
For me once I started wearing the YM II I really liked the 44 mm size!

as for the wrist size mine is 6.5 inches and fits to me great!








SohAIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2013, 04:13 PM   #54
Alex Ks
"TRF" Member
 
Alex Ks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 289
Love the SS YMII, however, for that price I would get something else (ROO or a used Gold GMTII)
Alex Ks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2013, 09:57 PM   #55
gwozhog
"TRF" Member
 
gwozhog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Point Blank, TX
Posts: 2,893
This IMHO is the nicest YM2 out of the whole collection
__________________
I once dated a girl in high school and her dad told me I would never amount to anything. He was right
gwozhog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 April 2013, 11:44 PM   #56
myjianrong
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Qatar, Singapore
Posts: 72
Italy AD quoted me Euro 15,400
myjianrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2013, 01:40 AM   #57
427shark
"TRF" Member
 
427shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: JD
Location: Jersey
Watch: Dj2 tt, 126610LV
Posts: 772
I love the new ym2 ss. I wanted a white face and wasn't quite satisfied with the explorer 2 so I held off. Really glad I did, on my list to pick up the new ym2 in the next couple years
427shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2013, 02:04 AM   #58
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
I've been skirting the idea of getting a YMII for a while now (in no small part thanks to Tom's amazing pictures). I had it narrowed down to YG and TT but now the SS is very appealing!
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2013, 02:23 AM   #59
advocatia
Banned
 
advocatia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Andy
Location: Florida USA
Watch: PAM 422 GMTIIC
Posts: 868
YMII. From a technology standpoint, very cool watch. From a practical/functional standpoint, useless. From a cosmetic standpoint, very beautiful but I could live without the "YACHMASTER II" on the bezel.

Would I wear one? Sure, any day. Would I buy one? No chance.
advocatia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2013, 02:27 AM   #60
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by myjianrong View Post
Italy AD quoted me Euro 15,400
Was that with 20% VAT?

If so it works out to 16K-ish USD
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.