ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does it make sense to pay for insurance against loss/theft/etc. on your watch(es)? | |||
Yes | 51 | 73.91% | |
No | 18 | 26.09% | |
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
13 April 2021, 09:08 PM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,697
|
Just out of curiosity, why are watches so much more expensive than homes to insure? Is it the size of the market, risk etc?
I realize the insurance companies have actuaries who’ve crunched all the numbers but here the cost of insuring a home (relatively speaking) is a fraction of the cost... OP to answer your question, I don’t insure my watches (I used to, but got tired of the premiums). I do insure our home |
13 April 2021, 10:32 PM | #32 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NorCal
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 6,556
|
Quote:
I upload photos of my watch / papers / receipts, and that covers that.
__________________
|
|
14 April 2021, 03:58 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 720
|
I have to send in photos of the watch / paperwork / appraisal using the company’s app which verifies my location to ensure I’m doing so from the address listed on my policy. After that everything goes to underwriting. It’s a very simple process.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 April 2021, 05:12 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
|
Quote:
1 - Small transactions, less efficient, requires higher ratio of premium/value to hold ROI. 2 - More likelihood of loss, few people file claims for losing their house or having it stolen. 3 - More opportunity for fraud. Tougher to fake a house title than a watch receipt. 4 - Less sensitivity to price. People insuring houses are across the financial spectrum, those insuring watches are less price sensitive. 5 - More likelihood that loss is total loss rather than partial loss. Probably 15 more factors? |
|
14 April 2021, 05:22 AM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
Quote:
a watch is a small item that a lot can happen to. that said on lower value watches self insurance has its benefits. higher ticket items just depends on one's pain tolerance.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
|
15 April 2021, 01:18 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Varies
Location: On a couch
Watch: Me
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
That’s $35k net after subtracting the few loss claims we made from our own funds. If you insure, then you have to insure everything because you don’t know what will be lost or stolen, or which car will breakdown, or what trip will be interrupted. But if you never insure, you statistically stand a great chance of being way ahead later in life. That’s why insurance is so profitable, and why the best money managers tell you not to buy all those extras. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.