The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

View Poll Results: Does it make sense to pay for insurance against loss/theft/etc. on your watch(es)?
Yes 51 73.91%
No 18 26.09%
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 April 2021, 09:08 PM   #31
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,697
Just out of curiosity, why are watches so much more expensive than homes to insure? Is it the size of the market, risk etc?

I realize the insurance companies have actuaries who’ve crunched all the numbers but here the cost of insuring a home (relatively speaking) is a fraction of the cost...

OP to answer your question, I don’t insure my watches (I used to, but got tired of the premiums). I do insure our home
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2021, 10:32 PM   #32
JParm
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
JParm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NorCal
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 6,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boopie View Post
As I understand it, in the event of a theft/loss my insurance carrier will cut a check for the amount the watch is insured for; they won’t source a replacement watch for me, and if I decide never to replace it, that’s on me. Obviously the premium is based on the insured value. So, whether we insure our 16710 for $5k or $15k, we’d get a check for the insured amount. If I choose to insure a 16710 for only $5k, I can’t cry that I can’t buy a replacement for that amount.
I got an appraisal done on 16710 a couple years ago and it's quoted at 10k; my insurance will pay that amount out (I've asked).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boopie View Post
Check and see if your insurance company does require that. Mine doesn’t, but I do need to provide a serial #.
I upload photos of my watch / papers / receipts, and that covers that.
__________________
JParm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:58 AM   #33
HippoPAPAmus
"TRF" Member
 
HippoPAPAmus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 720
I have to send in photos of the watch / paperwork / appraisal using the company’s app which verifies my location to ensure I’m doing so from the address listed on my policy. After that everything goes to underwriting. It’s a very simple process.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HippoPAPAmus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 05:12 AM   #34
CashGap
"TRF" Member
 
CashGap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Just out of curiosity, why are watches so much more expensive than homes to insure? Is it the size of the market, risk etc?
All of that. Let me see what I can think of...

1 - Small transactions, less efficient, requires higher ratio of premium/value to hold ROI.
2 - More likelihood of loss, few people file claims for losing their house or having it stolen.
3 - More opportunity for fraud. Tougher to fake a house title than a watch receipt.
4 - Less sensitivity to price. People insuring houses are across the financial spectrum, those insuring watches are less price sensitive.
5 - More likelihood that loss is total loss rather than partial loss.

Probably 15 more factors?
CashGap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 05:22 AM   #35
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Just out of curiosity, why are watches so much more expensive than homes to insure? Is it the size of the market, risk etc?

I realize the insurance companies have actuaries who’ve crunched all the numbers but here the cost of insuring a home (relatively speaking) is a fraction of the cost...

OP to answer your question, I don’t insure my watches (I used to, but got tired of the premiums). I do insure our home
harder to steal a house and the largest risk is singular which is fire, unless you are in a hurricane zone. still fire is the largest risk.

a watch is a small item that a lot can happen to.

that said on lower value watches self insurance has its benefits. higher ticket items just depends on one's pain tolerance.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2021, 01:18 AM   #36
TC94
"TRF" Member
 
TC94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Varies
Location: On a couch
Watch: Me
Posts: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post
Sorry I disagree.

Counting deductibles for claims, you would still be ahead if something were lost/stolen/destroyed.

There is no way I could take my Jewelers Mutual premiums and turn it into one watch value let alone an entire collection. Plus I don't have to worry about the principal that is contantly at risk in the markets.
I said ALL forms of insurance combined will add up to quite a bit. Since I don’t know which type of disaster will strike, I forego ALL forms of extra insurance. My wife and I calculated that, even after a few personal losses, we’d saved over $35k by 2015. We haven’t done th math since.

That’s $35k net after subtracting the few loss claims we made from our own funds.

If you insure, then you have to insure everything because you don’t know what will be lost or stolen, or which car will breakdown, or what trip will be interrupted.

But if you never insure, you statistically stand a great chance of being way ahead later in life. That’s why insurance is so profitable, and why the best money managers tell you not to buy all those extras.
TC94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.